Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 6 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nan Luo |
| 31 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ruth MA van Nispen |
| 6 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Garratt |
| 19 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Suzanne Polinder |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 19 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 25 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Suzanne Polinder |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 25 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 1 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ruth MA van Nispen |
| 4 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nan Luo |
| 4 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Garratt |
| 13 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Suzanne Polinder |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 13 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 21 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Suzanne Polinder |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 21 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 23 Dec 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 23 Dec 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-783 |
You can find further information about peer review here.