Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of main research findings of studies included in review

From: The provision of non-needle/syringe drug injecting paraphernalia in the primary prevention of HCV among IDU: a systematic review

Reference

Paraphernalia

Exposure

Outcome Measure

Measure of Association

Hagan et al. 2000 [19]a

Cooker or Filter

NSP users vs. nonusers

AOR (95%CI) of sharing paraphernalia with adjustment for heroin injection, frequency of injection, and syringe or cooker/cotton sharing or back loading

0.79 (0.58 - 1.08)

Huo et al. 2007 [20]a

Cooker, Filter or rinse water

NSP users vs. nonusers

Proportion of participants reporting sharing paraphernalia (behaviour at baseline to behaviour at 3 year follow up)

NSP users: 60% to ~22%

NSP nonusers: 70% to ~22%

Huo et al. 2007 [20]a

Cooker, Filter or rinse water

NSP users vs. nonusers

AOR (95%CI) of sharing paraphernalia with adjustment for year recruited, age, race, heroin or cocaine injection, injecting with others at least half the time, injecting in semi-public settings, injecting in shooting gallery, and having an IDU sex partner

0.70 (0.52 - 0.95)

Sears et al. 2001 [21]a

Cooker, Filter or rinse water

NSP users vs. nonusers

(complete case analysis, n = 101)

Proportion of participants reporting sharing paraphernalia (behaviour at baseline to behaviour at 1 year follow up)

NSP users: 61% to 45%

NSP nonusers: 40% to 30%

Stoltz et al. 2007. [22]a

Water

Frequent SIF user vs. infrequent SIF user

AOR (95%CI) of using clean water for injecting with adjustment for age, gender, sex trade involvement, daily cocaine and heroin injection

2.99 (2.13 - 4.18)

Vlahov et al. 1997 [23]a

Cooker

Pre- vs. post-enrolment in NSP

Proportion of participants reporting sharing paraphernalia

(at baseline and at 6 months)

59% to 39% d

Vlahov et al. 1997 [23]a

Filter

Pre- vs. post-enrolment in NSP

Proportion of participants reporting sharing paraphernalia

(at baseline and at 6 months)

46% to 31% d

Bluthenthal et al. 1998 [24]

Cooker, Filter or rinse water

Temporal trends in prevalence of sharing paraphernalia

Proportion of participants reporting sharing paraphernalia between wave 1 (1992) and wave 7 (1995)

~62% to ~40% d

Bluthenthal et al. 1998 [24]

Cooker, Filter or rinse water

Receipt of sterile injecting

paraphernalia in last 30 days vs. not

AOR (95%CI) of sharing paraphernalia with adjustment for wave of study recruitment, gender, neighbourhood, homelessness, HIV status, race, age, frequency of injection and drug preference.

1.11 (0.89 - 1.39)

Bluthenthal et al. 1998 [24]

Cooker, Filter or rinse water

NSP users vs. nonusers

AOR (95%CI) of sharing paraphernalia with adjustment for wave of study recruitment, gender, neighbourhood, homelessness, HIV status, race, age, frequency of injection and drug preference.

0.85 (0.68 - 1.07)

Morissette et al. 2009 [25]

Cooker

Use of sterile injecting equipment 'half the time or more' vs. 'less than half the time' in the last month

OR (95%CI) of sharing drug preparation equipment in the last 6 months

0.42 (0.22 - 0.80)

Morissette et al. 2009 [25]

Filter

Use of sterile injecting equipment 'half the time or more' vs. 'less than half the time' in the last month

OR (95%CI) of sharing drug preparation equipment in the last 6 months

0.52 (0.28 - 0.97)

Morissette et al. 2009 [25]

Water

Use of sterile injecting equipment 'half the time or more' vs. 'less than half the time' in the last month

OR (95%CI) of sharing drug preparation equipment in the last 6 months

0.51 (0.29 - 0.90)

Morissette et al. 2009 [25]

Cooker

Use of sterile injecting equipment 'half the time or more' vs. 'less than half the time' in the last month

AOR (95%CI) of being HCV negative vs. HCV positive (self-reported) adjusted for age, gender, education, injecting heroin as a primary drug, daily injecting, injecting alone, requiring help with injecting and problems obtaining sterile equipment from a NSP

3.92 (1.58 - 9.70)

Morissette et al. 2009 [25]

Filter

Use of sterile injecting equipment 'half the time or more' vs. 'less than half the time' in the last month

AOR (95%CI) of being HCV negative vs. HCV positive (self-reported) adjusted for age, gender, education, injecting heroin as a primary drug, daily injecting, injecting alone, requiring help with injecting and problems obtaining sterile equipment from a NSP

No association g

Morissette et al. 2009 [25]

Water

Use of sterile injecting equipment 'half the time or more' vs. 'less than half the time' in the last month

AOR (95%CI) of being HCV negative vs. HCV positive (self-reported) adjusted for age, gender, education, injecting heroin as a primary drug, daily injecting, injecting alone, requiring help with injecting and problems obtaining sterile equipment from a NSP

2.93 (1.12 - 7.68)

Longshore et al. 2001e [26]

Cooker

NSP attendance > 4 times vs. once or less/month

AOR (95%CI) of sharing paraphernalia with adjustment for age, race, sex, injection frequency, primary drug, and treatment experience.

0.39 (0.16 - 0.95)c

Longshore et al. 2001e [26]

Cooker

NSP attendance > 4 times vs. 2-4 times/month

AOR (95%CI) of sharing paraphernalia with adjustment for age, race, sex, injection frequency, primary drug, and treatment experience.

0.50 (0.28 - 0.89) c

Longshore et al. 2001e [26]

Filter

NSP attendance > 4 times vs. once or less/month

AOR (95%CI) of sharing paraphernalia with adjustment for age, race, sex, injection frequency, primary drug, and treatment experience.

0.64 (0.27 - 1.52)

Longshore et al. 2001e [26]

Filter

NSP attendance > 4 times vs. 2-4 times/month

AOR (95%CI) of sharing paraphernalia with adjustment for age, race, sex, injection frequency, primary drug, and treatment experience.

0.88 (0.49 - 1.59)

Kipke et al. 1997 [27]

Cooker, Filter or rinse water

NSP users vs. nonusers

AOR (95%CI) of sharing paraphernalia with adjustment for age, gender and ethnicity

0.53 (0.28 - 0.99)c

Sears et al. 2001 [28]

Filter

Intervention site vs. comparison sitef

AOR (95%CI) of using someone else's cotton with adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, illegal/marginal income source, use of drop-in centre, and number of times consumed alcohol in the past 30 days

No association g

Heimer et al. 2002. [29]

Cooker

NSP users vs. nonusers

Proportion of participants reporting sharing paraphernalia in last 30 days

9% vs.12% b

Heimer et al. 2002. [29]

Filter

NSP users vs. nonusers

Proportion of participants reporting sharing paraphernalia in last 30 days

6% vs.8% b

Heimer et al. 2002. [29]

Rinse water

NSP users vs. nonusers

Proportion of participants reporting sharing paraphernalia in last 30 days

3% vs. 9% d

Heimer et al. 2002. [29]

Drug water

NSP users vs. nonusers

Proportion of participants reporting sharing paraphernalia in last 30 days

3% vs.9% c

Guydish et al. 2008 [30]

Cooker, Filter or rinse water

NSP users who reported sharing rinse water in preceding 30 days vs. those who did not

Mean NSP visits in past 30 days

4.36 vs. 3.75 b

Guydish et al. 2008 [30]

Cooker, Filter or rinse water

NSP users who reported sharing rinse water in preceding 30 days vs. those who did not

Mean percent of syringes obtained from NSP

86% vs. 89% c

Colon et al. 2009 [31]

Water bottle

Pre vs. post intervention (18 week follow up)

Percentage of participants adopting injecting practices in the preceding 7 days

0% vs 56%d,h

Colon et al. 2009 [31]

Syringe filter

Pre vs. post intervention (18 week follow up)

Percentage of participants adopting injecting practices in the preceding 7 days

0% vs. 34%c,h

Colon et al. 2009 [31]

Cooker

Pre vs. post intervention (18 week follow up)

Percentage sharing cooker during last day of injection

16% vs. 6% b

  1. acohort studies did not report risk ratios: see Results section for details, bnot significant, cP < 0.05, dP < 0.001, eodds ratios presented here use the group with lower frequency of NSP use as the referent group (as compared to those presented in the text), fintervention site were recruited from an area in which a secondary exchange operated, comparison site were recruited from another location near which two other NSP operated, g result not presented, hpractices absent at baseline therefore p values for test against null hypothesis that proportions at follow up < 15%