Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
28 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
6 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jouke van der Zee |
31 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cecile Viboud |
16 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Tilston-Lunel |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
16 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Tilston-Lunel |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
16 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
20 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Tilston-Lunel |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
20 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
20 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cecile Viboud |
28 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jouke van der Zee |
18 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Tilston-Lunel |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
18 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
20 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jouke van der Zee |
27 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Tilston-Lunel |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
27 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
27 Oct 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
27 Oct 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-650 |
You can find further information about peer review here.