Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
21 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
25 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Luis Rajmil |
8 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jörgen Thorn |
14 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - sandra baldacci |
24 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Guy Marks |
5 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Dejana Vukovic |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
5 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Dejana Vukovic |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
5 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
6 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Luis Rajmil |
17 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jörgen Thorn |
2 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Dejana Vukovic |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
11 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jörgen Thorn |
2 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Dejana Vukovic |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
2 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
7 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Dejana Vukovic |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
7 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
9 Sep 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
9 Sep 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-546 |
You can find further information about peer review here.