Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
7 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
11 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Eisenberg |
17 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Thielke |
9 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Anna Christensson |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
13 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Thielke |
28 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Eisenberg |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
7 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Anna Christensson |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
7 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
13 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Anna Christensson |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
13 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
14 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Anna Christensson |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
14 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
15 Jun 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
15 Jun 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-343 |
You can find further information about peer review here.