Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
23 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rajalakshmi Lakshman |
24 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Federica Turati |
1 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hazel Inskip |
15 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Lynne Giles |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
15 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
26 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rajalakshmi Lakshman |
5 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hazel Inskip |
13 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Lynne Giles |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
13 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
10 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Lynne Giles |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
10 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
15 Jun 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
15 Jun 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-341 |
You can find further information about peer review here.