Peer Review reports
From: Evaluation of a brief anti-stigma campaign in Cambridge: do short-term campaigns work?
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 8 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maretha Visser |
| 11 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dan Hungerford |
| 19 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sara Evans-Lacko |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 19 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 30 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maretha Visser |
| 4 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dan Hungerford |
| 15 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sara Evans-Lacko |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 15 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 8 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sara Evans-Lacko |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 8 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 14 Jun 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 14 Jun 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-339 |
You can find further information about peer review here.