Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
8 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
7 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - PANAGIOTIS KORANTZOPOULOS |
15 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dimitri Mikhailidis |
16 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Demosthenes Panagiotakos |
12 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sinead Brophy |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
12 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
13 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sinead Brophy |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
13 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
27 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sinead Brophy |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
27 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
18 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sinead Brophy |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
18 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
2 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sinead Brophy |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
2 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
14 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sinead Brophy |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
14 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
14 Jun 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
14 Jun 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-338 |
You can find further information about peer review here.