Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
30 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
25 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rob van Hest |
27 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Manish Pareek |
21 Oct 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Kevin Schwartzman |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
21 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
21 Oct 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Kevin Schwartzman |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
21 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
21 Oct 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Kevin Schwartzman |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
21 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
2 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rob van Hest |
4 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Manish Pareek |
9 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Kevin Schwartzman |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
9 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
18 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kevin Schwartzman |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
18 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
20 Jan 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
20 Jan 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-28 |
You can find further information about peer review here.