Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
4 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Koen Meeussen |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
4 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mette Rurup |
25 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marion Danis |
16 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Koen Meeussen |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
16 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
30 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mette Rurup |
5 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Dickinson |
10 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Koen Meeussen |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
10 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
16 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Koen Meeussen |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
16 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
24 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Koen Meeussen |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
24 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
9 Apr 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
9 Apr 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-186 |
You can find further information about peer review here.