Peer Review reports
From: Analysis of the UK recommendations on obesity based on a proposed implementation framework
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 31 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Lobstein |
| 6 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shiriki Kumanyika |
| 9 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Gill |
| 27 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Amudha Poobalan |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 27 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 10 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Lobstein |
| 24 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Gill |
| 10 Sep 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Amudha Poobalan |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 10 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 14 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Lobstein |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 13 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Amudha Poobalan |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 13 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 15 Jan 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 15 Jan 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-17 |
You can find further information about peer review here.