Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthijs van Wijmen |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
2 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
12 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthijs van Wijmen |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
12 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
17 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthijs van Wijmen |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
17 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
23 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Matthijs van Wijmen |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
23 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
26 Mar 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
26 Mar 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-166 |
You can find further information about peer review here.