Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
14 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
3 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jacques van Eijk |
31 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Peter |
21 Oct 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Andreas Mielck |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
21 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
3 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jacques van Eijk |
9 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Peter |
15 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Andreas Mielck |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
15 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
2 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andreas Mielck |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
2 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
8 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andreas Mielck |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
8 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
16 Mar 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
16 Mar 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-135 |
You can find further information about peer review here.