Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
11 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
12 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Rajalakshmi Lakshman |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
12 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
13 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Rajalakshmi Lakshman |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
13 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
4 Mar 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Rajalakshmi Lakshman |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
4 Mar 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
5 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wilma Jansen |
1 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vera Verbestel |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
19 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vera Verbestel |
3 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wilma Jansen |
24 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Kalbfleisch |
22 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Rajalakshmi Lakshman |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
22 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
22 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Rajalakshmi Lakshman |
16 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Kalbfleisch |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
22 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
8 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Rajalakshmi Lakshman |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
8 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
10 Mar 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
10 Mar 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-123 |
You can find further information about peer review here.