Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sep 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 18 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christiane Stock |
| 23 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nathaniel Hupert |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 6 Mar 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Paula Tuulia Hakala |
| 25 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nathaniel Hupert |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 6 Mar 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 24 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nathaniel Hupert |
| 8 Oct 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Paula Tuulia Hakala |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 8 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 18 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Paula Tuulia Hakala |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 18 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 4 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Paula Tuulia Hakala |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 4 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 11 Jan 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 11 Jan 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-11 |
You can find further information about peer review here.