- Correction
- Open access
- Published:
Correction: A participatory and comprehensive intervention to improve violence prevention in two high-risk occupations: effect and process evaluation of a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial
BMC Public Health volume 24, Article number: 1243 (2024)
The Original Article was published on 15 April 2024
Correction: BMC Public Health 24, 1043 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18527-5
The original publication of this article [1] contained an incorrect version of Table 5, which was a duplicate of Table 6. The incorrect and correct version of Table 5 are published in this correction article. The original article has been updated.
Incorrect table 5
Construct and topics related violence prevention | Measure | Number of observations | Mean control phase | Mean intervention phase | Mean follow-up phase | Mean differences between follow up and control phase (confidence intervals) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary outcome | |||||||
Data based continuous violence prevention collaboration | To what extent are our violence prevention efforts continuously adjusted as a result of registrations and shared experiences? | 755 | 5.47 | 6.01 | 6.19 | 0.72 (-0.11;1.53) | 0.09 |
Secondary outcomes | |||||||
Cooperation between line managers and employees | To what extent does the line manager and employees cooperate on the prevention of violence and threats? | 782 | 5.70 | 6.20 | 6.34 | 0.64 (-0.19;1.45) | 0.13 |
Attention to violence prevention | To what extent does your line manager prioritize violence prevention | 849 | 7.49 | 7.49 | 6.93 | -0.57 (-1.88;0.75) | 0.34 |
To what extent does the working environment group prioritize violence prevention? | 779 | 7.80 | 8.16 | 7.69 | -0.11 (-1.23;0.10) | 0.84 | |
Actions taken to prevent violence and threats | Has there been improvements related to the prevention of violence and threats during the last three months? | 723 | 4.41 | 5.06 | 4.97 | 0.56 (-0.54;1.65) | 0.32 |
Violence prevention practices in your work unit | To what extent are guidelines for the prevention of violence and threats carried out in practice at your workplace by your line manager? | 781 | 7.63 | 7.45 | 6.81 | -0.82 (-1.10;0.36) | 0.76 |
To what extent are guidelines for the prevention of violence and threats carried out in practice at your workplace by the employees? | 832 | 7.12 | 7.48 | 7.82 | 0.70(-0.23;1.64) | 0.14 | |
Violence prevention climate scale | Violence Prevention Climate Scale | 839 | 25.35 | 26.17 | 25.24 | -0.11 (-1.69;1.45) | 0.88 |
Additional item about violence prevention climate | We are a unit that continuously makes an effort to prevent violence and threats. | 800 | 4.18 | 4.72 | 5.15 | 0.96 (0.53;1.41) | 0.00* |
Self-efficacy in violence prevention | To what extent do you have confidence in your colleagues’ competences to prevent violence and threats. | 851 | 7.39 | 7.80 | 7.98 | 0.59 (0.01:1.16) | 0.04* |
Sense of safety at work | Do you feel safe when you are at work? | 854 | 7.63 | 7.99 | 8.23 | 0.60 (0.56;1.15) | 0.03* |
Prevalence of violence and threats | Exposure to violence during the last three months | 843 | 1.44 | 1.29 | 1.28 | -0.14 (-0.34;0.6) | 0.16 |
Exposure to threats during the last three months | 845 | 1.92 | 1.84 | 1.88 | -0.04 (-0.30;0.23) | 0.79 |
Correct table 5
Construct and topics related violence prevention | Measure | Number of observations | Mean control phase | Mean intervention phase | Mean follow-up phase | Mean differences between follow up and control phase (confidence intervals) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary outcome | |||||||
Data based continuous violence prevention collaboration | To what extent are our violence prevention efforts continuously adjusted as a result of registrations and shared experiences? | 847 | 6.48 | 6.91 | 7.16 | 0.68 (0.07;1.26) | 0.03* |
Secondary outcomes | |||||||
Cooperation between line managers and employees | To what extent does the line manager and employees cooperate on the prevention of violence and threats? | 844 | 7.50 | 7.63 | 7.48 | -0.02 (-0.61;0.57) | 0.95 |
Attention to violence prevention | To what extent does your line manager prioritize violence prevention | 879 | 8.07 | 8.27 | 8.30 | 0.23 (-0.32;0.78) | 0.41 |
To what extent does the working environment group prioritize violence prevention? | 880 | 7.90 | 8.04 | 8.03 | 0.13 (-0.39;0.66) | 0.63 | |
Actions taken to prevent violence and threats | Has there been improvements related to the prevention of violence and threats during the last three months? | 841 | 6.04 | 6.54 | 6.13 | 0.09 (-0.69;0.87) | 0.82 |
Violence prevention practices in your work unit | To what extent are guidelines for the prevention of violence and threats carried out in practice at your workplace by your line manager? | 874 | 7.44 | 7.62 | 7.63 | 0.19 (-0.39;0.77) | 0.52 |
To what extent are guidelines for the prevention of violence and threats carried out in practice at your workplace by the employees? | 872 | 7.21 | 7.50 | 7.62 | 0.42 (-0.07) | 0.10 | |
Violence prevention climate scale | Violence Prevention Climate Scale | 830 | 27.79 | 27.72 | 28.06 | 0.27 (-0.98;1.50) | 0.68 |
Additional item about violence prevention climate | We are a unit that continuously makes an effort to prevent violence and threats. | 827 | 5.26 | 5.41 | 5.43 | 0.17(-0.11;0.46) | 0.22 |
Self-efficacy in violence prevention | To what extent do you have confidence in your colleagues’ competences to prevent violence and threats. | 832 | 7.68 | 7.69 | 7.85 | 0.17 (-0.29;0.63) | 0.46 |
Sense of safety at work | Do you feel safe when you are at work? | 834 | 7.89 | 7.76 | 7.80 | -0.09(-0.57;0.39) | 0.72 |
Prevalence of violence and threats | Exposure to violence during the last three months | 824 | 1.52 | 1.40 | 1.50 | -0.02 (-0.22;0.20) | 0.92 |
Exposure to threats during the last three months | 828 | 2.42 | 2.33 | 2.38 | -0.04 (-0.33;0.25) | 0.79 |
Reference
Andersen, et al. A participatory and comprehensive intervention to improve violence prevention in two high-risk occupations: effect and process evaluation of a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial. BMC Public Health. 2024;24:1043. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18527-5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Andersen, L.P., Jaspers, S., Andersen, D. et al. Correction: A participatory and comprehensive intervention to improve violence prevention in two high-risk occupations: effect and process evaluation of a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial. BMC Public Health 24, 1243 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18632-5
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18632-5