Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Socio-economic determinants of disease progression among HIV infected adults in Kenya

  • Nyawira T. Gitahi–Kamau1Email author,
  • James N. Kiarie1,
  • Kenneth K. Mutai4,
  • Beatrice W. Gatumia5,
  • P. M. Gatongi2 and
  • A. Lakati3
BMC Public Health201515:733

DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2084-8

Received: 26 June 2014

Accepted: 23 July 2015

Published: 31 July 2015

Abstract

Background

Socioeconomic determinants have been shown to have an effect on the progression of HIV disease evidenced by studies carried out largely in developed countries. Knowledge of these factors could inform on prioritization of populations during scale up of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) constrained health systems. The objective of this study was to identify socioeconomic correlates of HIV disease progression in an adult Kenyan population.

Methods

We analysed data from 312 HIV positive individuals, drawn from a cohort enrolled in a randomized clinical trial investigating the effectiveness of Acyclovir in the prevention of HIV transmission among serodiscordant couples. In this study we included individuals with CD4 counts ≥ 350 cells/mm3 and World Health Organization (WHO), clinical stage one or two. The exposure variables measured were: - daily household income available for expenditure, age, gender, housing type and level of formal education. We used a composite outcome of disease progression to WHO clinical stage 3 or 4 or a laboratory outcome of CD4 count below 350 cells/mm3 after two years of follow-up. Logistic regression was used to determine associations of variables that were found to be significant at univariate analysis, and to control for potential confounders.

Results

Seventy eight (25 %) individuals reported HIV disease progression. Majority (79.9 %) were female. The median age was 30 year and 93.6 % had attained a primary level of education. Median CD4 at enrolment into the clinical trial was 564 cells/mm3; those who had disease progression were enrolled with a significantly (p < 0.001) lower CD4 count. Daily household income available for expenditure adjusted for CD4 count at enrolment was associated significantly (p = 0.04) with HIV disease progression. Disease progression was five times more likely to occur in study subjects with daily income available for expenditure of less than US$1 compared to those with more than US$ 5 available for daily expenditure [adjusted Odds Ratio 4.6 (95 % Confidence Interval 1.4–14.4)]. Disease progression was not associated with age, gender, type of housing or level of education attained (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Populations with low household incomes should be considered vulnerable to disease progression and should therefore be prioritized during the scale up of HAART for treatment as prevention.

Keywords

Discordant Highly active antiretroviral therapy Income Socio-economic determinants Disease progression

Background

HIV disease progression to Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is one of the greatest contributors of mortality in Africa [1]. A large number of infections occur among serodiscordant couples [2]. The progressive loss of CD4+ T lymphocytes during HIV infection eventually results in an inability to mount an adequate immune response to opportunistic pathogens resulting in death [3].

Socioeconomic determinants such as age, sex, and income are reported as contributors to disease progression [48] in HIV infected individuals who are not on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). These factors may still continue to influence the uptake of care and treatment even, where these services are provided at no cost to the individual. There is a paucity of data on the effects of socioeconomic determinants of disease progression among HIV infected individuals in sub-Saharan Africa.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the treatment of all HIV positive individuals in a discordant relationship regardless of their CD4 count and all adults and adolescents with CD4 cell counts below 500 cells/mm3 [9] should receive treatment. The implementation of these guidelines [9] in low-income countries like Kenya [10] may be hindered due to the financial considerations on already strained health systems. To alleviate this, low and middle-income countries commonly use a phasic approach in the implementation of HAART scaling up [11]. Integration of clinical and sociodemographic criteria would be useful in the in prioritization of vulnerable populations. The objective of this study was to identify socioeconomic correlates of disease progression in HIV infected adults in serodiscordant relationships.

Methods

This study was conducted in a sample of HIV positive individuals drawn from a randomized clinical trial (RCT) carried out in a serodiscordant couple’s clinic in Nairobi. The RCT was investigating Acyclovir in the prevention of HIV transmission (HSV2/HIV1 study) - clinical trials no: NCT00194519 [12]. We analysed data from 312 HIV positive individuals drawn from a cohort of 416 study participants for a period of two years beginning in November 2011 and ending in June 2013. Participants were selected from the main cohort based on CD4 count of above 350 cells/mm3 and WHO clinical stage 1 or 2 at enrolment into the clinical trial. We excluded HIV positive individuals who seroconverted during the clinical trial [10]. Out of the total cohort initially enrolled in the clinical trial, 86 were excluded due to CD4 counts of ≤350 cells/mm3 at enrollment, because they were eligible for HAART according to the Kenya national guidelines 2011 [13]. End point outcomes for 18 participants (5 %) were unavailable because they were reported as lost to follow up (n = 11) or dead (n = 7) during the clinical trial. A summary of the cohort is illustrated in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Cohort selection

Disease progression was defined as a composite outcome of WHO clinical staging criteria stages 3 and 4 or CD4 count of < 350 cells/mm3. Outcomes were evaluated at six month intervals over the two years. Socio-demographic and economic predictors of disease investigated included daily income available for expenditure, level of education, housing settlement, age, and sex.

Data analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 17.0. The main outcome was HIV disease progression which was a composite outcome of CD4 less than 350 cells/mm3 and/or WHO clinical stage 3 or 4 within the 2-year follow up period. Available daily income for expenditure was categorized as < US$1, US$1–5 and > US$5 .We took into account taking the World Bank (WB) definitions of extreme poverty and poverty as having daily income available for expenditure below US$1.25 and below $2 respectively. We also allowed for the variations that occur within countries [14]. Chi-square tests were used to determine differences in disease progression (by both WHO staging and CD4 count criteria) across demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics. Mann Whitney U test was used to compare median CD4 at enrolment between the two disease progression groups. Logistic regression was carried out to determine independent predictors of HIV disease progression. CD4 count at enrolment (baseline) was a known confounder of disease progression and was included in the regression model after normalization through cube root transformation. All statistical tests were significant at a p value ≤0.05.

Ethical considerations

The HSV2/HIV1 study involved rigorous informed consent and counselling sessions during the enrolment of participants. Ethical approval was obtained from the Kenyatta National Hospital ethics research committee and the institutional regulatory board of University of Washington. The approvals allowed for the use of archived data and stored samples for future studies. The current study was approved by the Moi University Institutional regulatory and ethics committee.

Results

Population characteristics

The 312 individuals analyzed, entered the study in early HIV disease; characterized as WHO stage 1 or 2, or a CD4 count ≥350 cells/mm3. Eighty percent of all the study participants were female. Median age was 30 years (Interquartile Range [IQR]; 26, 35) with majority (91 %), below 40 years. The median household daily income for expenditure was $3 (IQR 1.25, 7). The population was highly literate with only 6.4 % reporting no basic education. Majority (61.2 %) of the participants lived in formal housing settlements. A summary of the background characteristics is shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of study population n = 312

Variable

Number

Percent

Sex

  

 Males

61

20.3

 Females

251

79.9

Age in years

  

 15-24

54

17.3

 25-34

175

56

 35-44

65

20.8

 45-54

12

3.9

 55-64

3

0.1

 65-74

3

0.1

Level of education

  

 Primary

128

41

 Sec school

111

35.6

 Tertiary

53

17

 No education

20

6.4

Daily household income available for expenditure

  

 <1$

135

43.3

 1-5$

131

41.9

 >5$

46

14.8

Housing settlement

  

 Informal

116

37.2

 Formal

191

61.2

 Not sure

5

1.6

Treatment arm

  

 Placebo

142

43

 Acyclovir

170

51.5

Baseline CD4 count

  

 350-500

121

38.8

 501-750

106

34.0

 750

85

27.2

 WHO stage 1 and 2

312

 

Disease progression

HIV disease progression occurred in 25 % (95 % CI 20.5–30.1 %) of the participants; 20.5 % showed progression based on CD4 count criteria (<350 cells/mm3) and 4.5 % depicted progression by WHO clinical staging criteria alone. During the two year follow up there were four reported deaths; three of which were from HIV associated conditions and one with no definitive diagnosis. Median CD4 count at baseline was 566 cells/ml (IQR 444, 566). There was a significant (p = 0.03) difference in median CD4 count for those who had progressed toCD4 counts of <350 cells/mm3 and those who had not. This difference indicated that CD4 count at entry was a confounder to be included in the logistic regression model during multivariate analyses. Daily income available for expenditure was found to be significantly (p = 0.04) associated with disease progression. There was no significant (p ≤ 0.05) association found at bivariate analyses of age, gender, level of education, housing and disease progression by CD4 count decline. As illustrated in Table 2.
Table 2

Demographic and socio-economic characteristics associated with HIV disease progression

Independent variable

Disease progression after two years n (%)

No Disease progression after two years n (%)

p value

Sex

   

 Male

21 (34.4)

40 (65.6)

0.058

 Female

57 (22.7)

194 (77.3)

 

Age

   

 24 years

12 (22.2)

42 (77.8)

0.685

 25-34years

42 (24.0)

133 (76.0)

 

 35-44years

20 (30.8)

45 (69.2)

 

 >45 years

4 (22.2)

14 (77.8)

 

Level of education

   

 None

4 (20)

16 (80)

0.754

 Primary

30 (23.4)

98 (76.6)

 

 Secondary

28 (25.2)

83 (74.8)

 

 Tertiary

16 (30.2)

37 (69.8)

 

Housing settlement

   

 Informal settlement

27 (23.3)

89 (76.7)

0.438

 Formal settlement

51 (26.7)

140 (73.3)

 

 Not sure

0 (0)

5 (100)

 

Daily income for expenditure

   

 Less than 1$

44 (32.6)

91 (67.4)

0.004

 Between 1$-5$

30 (22.9)

101 (77.1)

 

 >5$

4 (8.7)

42 (91.3)

 

Treatment arm

   

 Placebo

45 (31.7)

97 (68.3)

0.013

 Acyclovir

33 (19.4)

137 (80.6)

 

Correlates of disease progression

At multivariate analysis, slower disease progression was associated significantly (p = 0.01) with reported available daily income for expenditure of more than US$5; [adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 4.6 (95 % Confidence Interval (CI) 1.4–14.4] as compared to incomes of < $1. However this association was not significant (p = 0.057) at available daily incomes of between $1–5. CD4 count levels at enrolment remained a significant (p < 0.001) predictor of disease progression (aOR 0.3 [95 % CI 0.2–0.4]. All the other variables in the model which included age, sex and clinical trial intervention were not independently associated with disease progression. Similarly, a significantly smaller proportion (19.4 %) of the participants who had received acyclovir as the clinical trial intervention had progressed compared to those in the placebo group (31.7 %), p = 0.013. As illustrated in Table 3.
Table 3

Predictors of HIV disease progression at multivariate analysis

Variable

Crude Odds Ratio (cOR)

95 % CI

P value

Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR)

95 % CI

p value

Gender

      

 Female

0.6

0.3, 1.0

0.058

0.7

0.3, 1.5

0.354

 Male

Ref

  

Ref

  

Age in years

1.01

0.98, 1.04

0.600

0.99

0.95, 1.03

0.497

Expenditure/day

      

 < US$1

5.1

1.7, 15.1

0.003

4.5

1.4, 14.1

0.010

 US$ 1-5

3.1

1.0, 9.4

0 .043

3.1

1.0, 9.7

0.057

 >US$ 5

Ref

  

Ref

  

Treatment group

      

 Acyclovir

0.5

0.3, 0.9

0.013

0.6

0.3, 1.0

0.052

 Placebo

Ref

  

Ref

  

CD4 at baseline/enrolment CD4 (cube root transformation)

0.3

0.2, 0.4

<0.0

0.3

0.2, 0.4

<0.001

Discussion

In this study there were more HIV- infected individuals, who showed progression based on WHO clinical staging criteria compared to those showing progression based on CD4 count criteria. This is similar to studies in the PRE-HAART era [15] where disease progression was reported earlier when defined by laboratory criteria rather than by the development of an opportunistic infection.

This study found a strong association between daily incomes and disease progression portrayed by a decrease in CD4 counts to below 350 cells/mm3 (p = 0.026 CI 95 %). This progression occurred in spite of the optimal provision of free HIV care and treatment for opportunistic infections and prophylaxis using cotrimoxazole or dapsone. Income as a determinant of disease progression was strengthened by finding of an association between higher daily income available for expenditure and delayed disease progression. The acyclovir arm had been reported as having displayed delayed disease progression in the larger study [12]. Studies in America and Canada [5, 6] have reported a similar association between low incomes and more rapid HIV disease progression. Additional evidence shows, higher rates of disease progression after seroconversion among individuals with low incomes levels prior to infection [9]. The association between income and disease progression can therefore not be explained by a reduction of income due to HIV infection and morbidity. We postulate that micronutrient deficiencies which are common in low-income countries and have been proven to compromise the immune systems of HIV infected individuals [16] may play a role in the rate of disease progression observed [16]. Even with most treatment programmes providing multivitamin supplementation to individuals in care and treatment, People Living with HIV (PLWHIV) still bear a heavy burden of dietary micronutrient supplementation which is affected by the daily income available for expenditure. This contributes to the [16] weakening of the immune system and the depletion of CD4 cells resulting in faster disease progression. Micronutrient deficiency in the diet may explain the strong association found in this study between income available for daily expenditure and disease progression. Even with HAART provision, low income levels continue to be associated with poor health outcomes. In Kenya the inability to pay for transport to a HAART provision centre results in poor uptake of HAART [17]. Similarly, a study in British Columbia also reported the inability to pay for transport to a treatment centre as a cause of poor treatment outcomes among individuals with low-income [18]. The cost of transport to a treatment centre may therefore be another reason for the association between HIV disease progression and daily income available for expenditure.

Studies in Tanzania, Uganda and France [5, 19, 20] have found higher rates of disease progression in individuals above 40 years. This study did not find an association (p = 0.68; p < 0.05) between age, and disease progression. The finding of age as a non-determinant of disease progression in this study was most likely due to only 9 % of the participants’ being above 40 years. This study also found no association (p = 0.06; p < 0.05) between sex and disease progression measured using WHO criteria or a reduction in CD4 counts. This finding was corroborated by findings of various studies [6, 7] including a meta-analysis of 23 cohorts from Europe, Australia, and Canada which reported no association between sex and HIV disease progression [7]. The lack of association between level of education and disease progression in this study corresponds to findings in other similar studies of HAART naive individuals [5, 8]. Associations have been found in individuals already on HAART [21] with increased level of education. This delayed progression is attributed to the empowered attitude towards treatment and care resulting from higher levels of education. This did not apply to this study which focused on the period before initiation of HAART.

This study is unusual as it integrated widely accepted definitions of poverty [14] during analysis allowing comparison of results among other low and middle income countries within a global context. The study was conducted in a cohort of HIV positive individuals in serodiscordant unions who were all participating in a controlled trial. This may have introduced some level of selection bias though it is important to note that progression of disease is not expected to be different from other HIV positive individuals. The retrospective study design limited the socioeconomic indicators available to those captured during data collection for HSV2/HIV1 study clinical trial as this study was retrospective [12].

The data presented here however indicates that poverty, defined as the level of daily income available for expenditure, influences pre-HAART HIV disease progression and deserves consideration as a contextual factor in HIV disease progression. Additionally, impoverished populations may benefit from prioritization during implementation of WHO guidelines.

Conclusions

The association reported between daily income available for daily expenditure and HIV disease progression indicates that economic empowerment should be considered as a possible contributor to better health outcomes in HIV infected individuals. We recommend prioritization of populations with the lowest daily available incomes for expenditure in low and middle income countries during the implementation of HAART scale up.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Prof. J Kiarie and Dr. Grace John- Stewart for encouraging the concept of this study. We would also like to acknowledge Dr. Lakati and Prof. Gatongi for their invaluable input and assistance in the manuscript writing. We also wish to acknowledge Dr. Beatrice Gatumia, Dr. Eric Mugambi, Dr. Laura Newman and Dr. Kenneth Ngure for their input during the review of this manuscript. Last but not least we would like to thank Paul Mwai for his input in the review of the statistical analysis and results.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Nairobi, College of Health sciences, Kenyatta National Hospital
(2)
Moi University, School of Medicine
(3)
Directorate of Capacity Building -AMREF International Training Programme
(4)
Kenyatta National Hospital, Respiratory and infectious disease unit
(5)
Kenya Heart Foundation

References

  1. UNAIDS. UNAIDS World aids day report 2011. In. Edited by (UNAIDS) JUNPoHA. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2011: 48.Google Scholar
  2. Guthrie BL, de Bruyn G, Farquhar C. HIV-1-discordant couples in sub-Saharan Africa: explanations and implications for high rates of discordancy. Curr HIV Res. 2007;5(4):416–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Organization WHO. Laboratory guidelines for enumerating CD4 T Lymphocytes in the context of HIV/AIDS. 2007. p. 62.Google Scholar
  4. Carre N, Deveau C, Belanger F, Boufassa F, Persoz A, Jadand C, et al. Effect of age and exposure group on the onset of AIDS in heterosexual and homosexual HIV-infected patients. SEROCO Study Group. AIDS (London, England). 1994;8(6):797–802.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Iralu J, Duran B, Pearson CR, Jiang Y, Foley K, Harrison M. Risk factors for HIV disease progression in a rural southwest American Indian population. Public Health Rep. 2010;125 Suppl 4:43–50.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Konrad S. Identifying determinants of HIV disease progression in Saskatoon. Saskatchewan: University of Saskatchewan; 2011. Retrieved from http://library.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-08282011.Google Scholar
  7. Jarrin I, Geskus R, Bhaskaran K, Prins M, Perez-Hoyos S, Muga R, et al. Gender differences in HIV progression to AIDS and death in industrialized countries: slower disease progression following HIV seroconversion in women. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168(5):532–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Monge S, Jarrin I, Perez-Hoyos S, Ferreros I, Garcia-Olalla P, Muga R, et al. Educational level and HIV disease progression before and after the introduction of HAART: a cohort study in 989 HIV seroconverters in Spain. Sex Transm Infect. 2011;87(7):571–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Organization WHO. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection - Recommendations for a public health approach. Geneva; 2013. Available at http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2013/new_hiv_recommendations_20130630/en/.
  10. Ministry of Health; National AIDS and STI Control Program (NASCOP). Guidelines on Use of Antiretroviral Drugs for Treating and Preventing HIV Infection in Kenya: A rapid advice. Nairobi, Kenya; 2014. Available at http://healthservices.uonbi.ac.ke/sites/default/files/centraladmin/healthservices/Rapid%20Advice%20Booklet%202014%2024%20June%2012%20noon_0.pdf.
  11. Organization WHO. An approach to rapid scale-up using HIV/AIDS treatment and care as an example Geneva. 2013. Available at http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/prev_care/en/rapidscale_up.pdf.Google Scholar
  12. Celum C, Wald A, Lingappa JR, Magaret AS, Wang RS, Mugo N, et al. Acyclovir and transmission of HIV-1 from persons infected with HIV-1 and HSV-2. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(5):427–39.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Ministry of Health; National AIDS and STI Control Program (NASCOP). Guidelines for Antiretroviral Therapy in Kenya, 4th edn. Kenya. 2011.Google Scholar
  14. World Bank development research group. Poverty lines across the world; 2010 https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/3771/WPS5284.pdf?sequence=1.
  15. Osmond D, Charlebois E, Lang W, Shiboski S, Moss A. Changes in AIDS survival time in two San Francisco cohorts of homosexual men, 1983 to 1993. JAMA. 1994;271(14):1083–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Baum MK, Shor-Posner G. Micronutrient status in relationship to mortality in HIV-1 disease. Nutr Rev. 1998;56(1 Pt 2):S135–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Otieno PA, Kohler PK, Bosire RK, Brown ER, Macharia SW, John-Stewart GC. Determinants of failure to access care in mothers referred to HIV treatment programs in Nairobi, Kenya. AIDS Care. 2010;22(6):729–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Joy R, Druyts EF, Brandson EK, Lima VD, Rustad CA, Zhang W, et al. Impact of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status on HIV disease progression in a universal health care setting. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;47(4):500–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Isingo R, Zaba B, Marston M, Ndege M, Mngara J, Mwita W, et al. Survival after HIV infection in the pre-antiretroviral therapy era in a rural Tanzanian cohort. AIDS (London, England). 2007;21 Suppl 6:S5–S13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lutalo T, Gray RH, Wawer M, Sewankambo N, Serwadda D, Laeyendecker O, et al. Survival of HIV-infected treatment-naive individuals with documented dates of seroconversion in Rakai, Uganda. AIDS (London, England). 2007;21 Suppl 6:S15–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Subhasish B, Varanasi A, Gyi M. Demographic, socioeconomic and psychological determinants of HIV treatment: a community experience [abstract]. BJMP. 2009;2(2):42–5.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Gitahi-Kamau et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement