Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Increased standardized incidence ratio of breast cancer in female electronics workers

  • Tzu-I Sung1,
  • Pau-Chung Chen1, 2,
  • Lukas Jyuhn-Hsiarn Lee3,
  • Yi-Ping Lin2, 4,
  • Gong-Yih Hsieh1 and
  • Jung-Der Wang1, 2, 5Email author
BMC Public Health20077:102

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-102

Received: 04 November 2006

Accepted: 08 June 2007

Published: 08 June 2007

Abstract

Background

In 1994, a hazardous waste site, polluted by the dumping of solvents from a former electronics factory, was discovered in Taoyuan, Taiwan. This subsequently emerged as a serious case of contamination through chlorinated hydrocarbons with suspected occupational cancer. The objective of this study was to determine if there was any increased risk of breast cancer among female workers in a 23-year follow-up period.

Methods

A total of 63,982 female workers were retrospectively recruited from the database of the Bureau of Labor Insurance (BLI) covering the period 1973–1997; the data were then linked with data, up to 2001, from the National Cancer Registry at the Taiwanese Department of Health, from which standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for different types of cancer were calculated as compared to the general population.

Results

There were a total of 286 cases of breast cancer, and after adjustment for calendar year and age, the SIR was close to 1. When stratified by the year 1974 (the year in which the regulations on solvent use were promulgated), the SIR of the cohort of workers who were first employed prior to 1974 increased to 1.38 (95% confidence interval, 1.11–1.70). No such trend was discernible for workers employed after 1974. When 10 years of employment was considered, there was a further increase in the SIR for breast cancer, to 1.62. Those workers with breast cancer who were first employed prior to 1974 were employed at a younger age and for a longer period. Previous qualitative studies of interviews with the workers, corroborated by inspection records, showed a short-term high exposure to chlorinated alkanes and alkenes, particularly trichloroethylene before 1974. There were no similar findings on other types of cancer.

Conclusion

Female workers with exposure to trichloroethylene and/or mixture of solvents, first employed prior to 1974, may have an excess risk of breast cancer.

Background

The discovery of uncontrolled hazardous waste sites has emerged, in many countries, as an issue of major environmental and public health concern [1]. In 1994, a hazardous waste site, polluted by the dumping of solvents from a former factory, was discovered in Taoyuan, Taiwan; the factory was built in 1970, and was in operation for the manufacturing of electronic appliances up until 1992. This discovery subsequently emerged as a serious case of soil and groundwater contamination accompanied by suspected occupational cancer.

The factory had been inspected eight times by the Taiwanese government's inspection agency, with multiple violations of the regulations having been recorded. There were, for example, six separate citations amongst these violations for inadequate wind speed and/or capture velocity of the factory's ventilation devices [2]. The presence of tetrachloroethylene (PCE), 1,1-dichloroethylene, 1,1-dichloroethane, methylene chloride, trichloroethane (TCH), 1,1,2-trichloroethane, 1,2-dichloroethane and cis-1,2-dichloroethylene was subsequently detected in the soil and groundwater [3, 4]. From a review of the literature at the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the US National Toxicology Program and the Integrated Risk Information System, we find an association has been reported between 1,1-dichloroethylene, 1,1-dichloroethane, methylene chloride, 1,2-dichloroethane and carbon tetrachloride, and the incidence of mammary gland adenocarcinomas in animals [5].

A prior study of risk assessment provided evidence on exposure to chlorinated alkanes and alkenes (CA) in community residents, accompanied by the increased risk of liver cancer [6, 7], whilst a proportionate cancer morbidity ratio (PCMR) study found a significant increase in breast cancer (1.4 times) amongst workers in this company, as compared to workers in the weaving industry [8]. However, a subsequent standardized mortality ratio (SMR) study found no significant increase in cancer between 1990 and 1997 [9]. A further retrospective morbidity study, based on the same cohort, found a significant increase in the crude standardized incidence ratio for female breast cancer (SIR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.0–1.4) [10]; however, the authors could find no significant dose-response related to duration of employment, and therefore make no conclusive inferences.

Nonetheless, a formal hypothesis linking breast cancer to solvents has been proposed by Canadian researchers, who found the persistent presence of many kinds of solvents in the breast milk of women which could potentially lead to an increase in the opportunity for initiating, or promoting cancer [11]. The period of adolescence, during which breast tissue undergoes substantial cellular proliferation, may diminish the time available for DNA repair [12]; thus, exposure to potential carcinogenic factors prior to such cellular differentiation may potentially increase the risk of cancer in later life [13]. Since an increase in mammary cancer has been found in female mice after chronic exposure to a mixture of CA [14], this retrospective cohort study was carried out based upon standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), in order to test the hypothesis of increased breast cancer amongst these female workers, with a 23-year follow-up period.

Methods

A retrospective design was adopted for this study, incorporating secondary vital statistics data and employment records from the labor insurance database on a former electronics factory in Taiwan. The factory, which was located at latitude 24°N and longitude 121°E, covered an area of 36,000 km2. At the end of 2001, the total population in Taiwan was 22,092,387, comprising of 11,312,728 males and 10,779,659 females. The original cohort comprised of 64,000 female employees who had worked at the factory between 1973 and 1992. Three other workers with cancer were also excluded, because their diagnoses were established prior to the time of their first employment at the factory.

Following the further exclusion of 15 workers, each of whom had less than one full day of employment, we were left with a total of 63,982 workers for subsequent analysis. We obtained vital statistics data, reported by geographical location in Taiwan, from the Ministry of the Interior (MoI), within which both local and national vital statistics are centralized, along with census information. The Taiwan household registration program is designed to collate and supply demographic information, with every birth and death being ascertained by a formal certificate written and attested by a physician.

The coding of the sites of cancer was based upon the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology issued by the Department of Health, and the diagnoses of cancer for this cohort were determined by linking employee identification numbers for the entire cohort, from 1 January 1979 to 31 December 2001, with the data obtained from the Taiwan National Cancer Registry. The cancer registry is a population-based registry containing information on newly-diagnosed cancer patients in all hospitals in Taiwan with 50 beds or more. The registry is financially supported by a government agency, with registration fees being paid to the reporting hospitals on the basis of each case number reported.

The raw employment data on this cohort, provided by the Institute of Occupational Safety and Health and covered the period from 21 May 1973 to 31 December 1997, were retrieved from the database of the Bureau of Labor Insurance (BLI) of Taiwan. The overall duration of employment in this study was therefore accumulated from the beginning of the coverage of labor insurance to the date of the termination of employment.

Based upon knowledge amassed from our prior qualitative studies, for those subjects with incomplete BLI records, we made the following assumptions for the estimation of duration of employment. Where the date of first employment (and labor insurance) was missing, this was assumed to be the earliest age, i.e., 14 years; where the date of termination of employment was missing, this was assumed to be the end of factory operations in 1992. The Labor Insurance Act, promulgated by the government in 1958, subsequently came into effect in 1960. Thereafter, all Taiwanese citizens between the ages of 15 and 60 years were required to join the employment insurance program, as insured workers, either through their employer or through the establishment to which they belonged.

The latent periods of cancer in different organ systems are generally quite different. Although assuming minimal latency based upon a literature review may inadvertently increase the counting, within the denominators, of 'person-years at risk', we still made such choices in order to obtain conservative estimates. The latent periods of different cancers were: five years for cancer of thyroid [15], leukemia [16], 15 years for cancer of breast [17, 18] and cervix uteri [19], and 10 years for the others [20].

Since workers in the early-1970s were exposed to high levels of solvents within a very short period of time, we stratified the durations of employment into less than, and more than, one year. 'Person-years at risk' for each individual worker were accrued after the assumed latent periods. The National Cancer Registry of Taiwan came into operation on 1 January 1979; thus, the collation of numbers of new cancer cases was based upon the earliest date of cancer occurrence, death, or the date when the person was last known to be alive and free of cancer on 31 December 2001. The number of cases was then stratified by age, calendar year, duration of employment, and the time of first employment.

Due to the lack of detailed information on exposure for each worker, we could only explore the dose-response relationship by stratifying the duration of employment into one month, and one, five, 10, 15 and 20 years. In order to account for the ambiguous nature of the latent periods, we conservatively apply the time since first employment as the time lag, thereby assuming that all workers became exposed once they were employed at the factory [21]. The short durations of exposure were decided by the extensive personal interviews from our qualitative study in 2003, which found short-term high exposure in female workers during the early-1970s [22].

No data on solvent exposure had been kept by the factory, and although we attempted to produce a reconstruction of such exposure, our dataset was too limited and crude to permit any possible linkage to individual workers. Following a serious outbreak of chemical hepatitis in another electronics factory in 1972 [23], the government issued strict regulations on the use of organic solvents within factories; these regulations were promulgated on 20 June 1974, followed by other amendments prior to 1990 (on 16 February 1976 and 21 November 1978) [24]. Under the current law in Taiwan, the use of CA is now strictly regulated in all workplaces.

The regulations in Taiwan cover trichloromethane (TCA), 1,1,2,2,-tetrachloroethane, tetra chloromethane, 1,2,-dichloroethylene, 1,2,-dichloroethane, carbon disulfide, TCE, PCE, methylene chloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane and their mixtures. However, the factory inspection records on this company indicated that there were multiple violations of standards for ventilation devices, particularly in the early years [2]. We stratified the cohort into four groups to represent the cancer risks during different periods, according to the three promulgation and amendment dates noted above.

Statistical Analysis

The PC Life Table Analysis System (LTAS) Version 1.0d was used to calculate the standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for cancer. The system was developed by the Division of Surveillance, Hazards Evaluation and Field Studies (DSHEFS) of the US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), and provided for use by the public health community [25]. To be brief, the observed numbers of cancer cases amongst the cohort were compared with the expected numbers derived from the incidence rate amongst the general population in Taiwan during each calendar year. Expected numbers of cancer were calculated based on gender-, age-, and calendar time-specific incidence rates (five-year strata) of the Taiwan general population applied to the cohort's experience of person-years of follow-up in each specific stratum, and then summed up across different strata for different types of cancer. Then, the total numbers of observed cases were divided by the corresponding total expected number to obtain the SIR for a specific type of cancer, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) being also calculated under the assumption that the number of incidences had a Poisson distribution. To evaluate the potential impact of governmental regulation in 20 June 1974, the cohorts were divided into sub-cohorts of first employed before and after 1974, and estimated SIRs with 95% CI were also calculated for cancer types with case numbers larger than 50, namely, cancer of breast, cervix, thyroid, colon and rectum. Finally, t-tests were performed to compare the two sub-cohorts with breast cancer (employed before vs. after 1974) on three continuous outcomes, i.e., age at diagnosis, age at first employment, and length of employment.

This study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of the National Taiwan University College of Public Health before commencement.

Results

A total of 63,982 female workers were recruited for this study, providing a total follow-up period of 1,403,824 person-years (without latent periods), as shown in Table 1. Within the whole sample 8,461 females first entered the factory during the high-exposure period, prior to 20 June 1974. More than half of them were less than 20 years of age at the time of their first employment, and 54 percent were employed for less than one year.
Table 1

Frequency distributions of demographic and cancer data on 63,982 female workers in electronics manufacturing

Variables

No.

%

First Employment

  

   Before 20 June 1974

8,461

13.2

   20 June 1974–16 February 1976

6,778

10.6

   16 February 1976–21 November 1978

12,624

19.7

   After 21 November 1978

36,119

56.5

Age at first employment

  

   < 20 years old

36,370

56.8

   ≥ 20 years old

27,612

43.2

Duration of Employment

  

   < 1 month

13,496

21.1

   1–11 months

20,969

32.9

   1–4 years

11,504

18.0

   5–9 years

4,655

7.3

   ≥ 10 years

13,358

20.9

Accumulated Person-years for Different Durations of Employment

  

   < 1 month

271,056

19.3

   1–11 months

471,828

33.6

   1–4 years

294,683

21.0

   5–9 years

158,847

11.3

   ≥ 10 years

207,410

14.8

Cancer Sites

  

   Total (1979–2001)

1,572

100.0

   Lip, Oral Cavity and Pharynx

59

3.8

   Digestive Organs and Peritoneum

247

15.7

   Respiratory System

60

3.8

   Breast

385

24.5

   Genital Organs

585

37.2

   Urinary Organs

21

1.3

   Other and Unspecified Sites

167

10.6

   Lymphatic and Hematopoietic Tissue

48

3.1

After consideration for different latent periods of different types of cancer, no significant increases were found in the SIRs for any cancer sites except that of thyroid gland, as summarized in Table 2. Thyroid cancer risk was slightly but significantly lower than expected, and the SIR was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.58–0.98). When allowing 15 years of time lag following the time of first employment, this provided a total of 475,529 person-years of follow-up, with 286 cases of breast cancer. Further analysis, allowing 20 and 25 years of time lag after the time of first employment, also showed no significant increases for all types of cancer, with the exception of breast cancer. Where 20- and 25-year periods were allowed for time lag, then the respective SIRs for breast cancer were 1.18 (95% CI: 1.01–1.37) and 1.36 (95% CI: 1.04–1.75).
Table 2

Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), by different types of cancer, 1979–2001

Cancer Sites

Lag Period (years)

Observed No. of Cancer Cases

Expected No. of Cancer Cases a

SIR (95% CI)

Oral Cavity

10

10

13.5

0.74 (0.35–1.36)

Salivary glands

10

4

4.3

0.93 (0.25–2.38)

Nasopharynx

10

25

36.0

0.69 (0.45–1.03)

Esophagus

10

2

1.7

1.16 (0.14–4.20)

Stomach

10

42

47.6

0.88 (0.64–1.19)

Small intestine

10

3

3.0

1.01 (0.21–2.94)

Colon and rectum

10

98

89.3

1.10 (0.89–1.34)

Liver and intrahepatic bile ducts

10

36

45.5

0.79 (0.55–1.10)

Gall bladder and extrahepatic bile ducts

10

1

5.2

0.19 (0.005–1.07)

Pancreas

10

11

6.7

1.64 (0.82–2.94)

Peritoneum and other

10

6

3.4

1.77 (0.65–3.85)

Trachea, bronchus, and lung

10

46

49.9

0.92 (0.67–1.23)

Other parts of respiratory system

10

3

7.8

0.38 (0.08–1.13)

Breast

15

286

263.6

1.09 (0.96–1.22)

Cervix uteri

15

337

352.4

0.96 (0.86–1.06)

Other Parts of Uterus

15

25

25.9

0.96 (0.62–1.42)

Ovary, Fallopian Tube, and Broad Ligament

10

36

43.3

0.83 (0.58–1.15)

Other genital organs

10

7

7.0

0.99 (0.40–2.05)

Kidney and other Urinary Organs

10

15

13.6

1.10 (0.62–1.82)

Bladder

10

3

8.8

0.34 (0.07–1.00)

Skin

10

22

21.3

1.03 (0.65–1.56)

Brain

10

14

13.0

1.07 (0.59–1.80)

Other parts of nervous system

10

2

1.4

1.43 (0.17–5.17)

Thyroid gland

5

59

77.9

0.76 (0.58–0.98)

Bone

10

3

3.2

0.92 (0.19–2.70)

Connective tissue

10

11

8.4

1.31 (0.65–2.34)

Other and unspecified sites

10

24

28.4

0.84 (0.54–1.26)

Leukemia

5

23

29.5

0.78 (0.49–1.17)

All Sites

10

1,311

1,365.4

0.96 (0.91–1.01)

Notes:

aThe expected number of cases amongst the total sample of 63,982 female workers was calculated based upon the age and calendar year-specific incidence rates of the general population.

Further cross-stratification was carried out for cancer of breast, thyroid, cervix, and colorectum based upon the duration of employment and the year of promulgation of the strict regulations on CA (20 June 1974), as summarized in Table 3. The significant increase in overall risk of breast cancer was found (SIR = 1.68; 95% CI: 1.11–2.42) if allowed for at least 10-year duration of employment. But increased risks in the strata of 10-year duration of employment were not found for cervical, colon and rectal cancer. No decreased risk of thyroid cancer was found for different duration of employment. A total of 90 cases of breast cancer were observed with an SIR of 1.38 (95% CI: 1.11–1.70) for the sub-cohort first employed prior to 1974. The SIR increased to 1.62 (95% CI: 1.02–2.42) if allowed more than 10-year duration of employment. There was no significant trend for increased risk with time since first employment. Furthermore, if workers employed for less than one year were excluded for fear of inadequate dose and/or induction time, the SIR became 1.36 (95% CI: 1.04–1.75). Among those female workers first employed before and after 1974, the SIRs for cervical, colorectal, and thyroid cancer were not significantly increased or decreased (Table 3).
Table 3

Comparison of observed to expected (O/E) numbers of cases and standardized incidence ratios (SIR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for 4 different types of cancer amongst female workers, by calendar years and duration of employment

 

Breast cancer

Cervical cancer

Colorectal cancer

Thyroid cancer

Duration of Employment

O/E

SIR (95% CI)

O/E

SIR (95% CI)

O/E

SIR (95% CI)

O/E

SIR (95% CI)

Overall

        

< 1 month

56/43.8

1.28 (0.97–1.66)

66/59.2

1.11 (0.86–1.42)

18/15.5

1.16 (0.69–1.84)

11/15.2

0.73 (0.36–1.30)

1–11 months

84/84.9

0.99 (0.79–1.22)

132/114.9

1.15 (0.96–1.36)

36/27.7

1.30 (0.91–1.80)

22/25.7

0.86 (0.54–1.30)

1–4 years

71/64.8

1.10 (0.86–1.38)

68/90.2

0.75 (0.59–0.96)

18/17.8

1.01 (0.60–1.60)

11/15.3

0.72 (0.36–1.29)

5–9 years

47/53.3

0.88 (0.65–1.17)

60/68.9

0.87 (0.66–1.12)

11/13.2

0.84 (0.42–1.50)

7/8.6

0.82 (0.33–1.69)

≥ 10 years

28/16.7

1.68 (1.11–2.42)

11/19.3

0.57 (0.28–1.02)

15/15.3

0.98 (0.55–1.62)

8/13.2

0.61 (0.26–1.20)

Total

286/263.6

1.09 (0.96–1.22)

337/352.4

0.96 (0.86–1.06)

98/89.3

1.10 (0.89–1.34)

59/77.9

0.76 (0.58–0.98)

Before 20 June 1974

        

< 1 month

11/5.6

1.97 (0.98–3.52)

5/7.4

0.68 (0.22–1.58)

1/1.8

0.57 (0.01–3.15)

0/1.1

-

1–11 months

19/15.6

1.22 (0.73–1.90)

26/20.8

1.25 (0.82–1.83)

5/4.9

1.02 (0.33–2.39)

2/2.9

0.68 (0.08–2.47)

1–4 years

17/12.3

1.38 (0.81–2.22)

16/17.3

0.93 (0.53–1.50)

2/3.6

0.56 (0.06–2.02)

2/1.9

1.03 (0.12–3.71)

5–9 years

20/17.5

1.14 (0.70–1.76)

14/23.3

0.60 (0.33–1.01)

7/4.0

1.73 (0.69–3.57)

0/2.7

-

≥ 10 years

23/14.2

1.62 (1.02–2.42)

11/16.5

0.67 (0.33–1.19)

6/6.3

0.96 (0.35–2.08)

1/3.6

0.28 (0.004–1.54)

Total

90/65.2

1.38 (1.11–1.70)

72/85.2

0.84 (0.66–1.06)

21/20.5

1.02 (0.63–1.56)

5/12.2

0.41 (0.13–0.95)

After 20 June 1974

        

< 1 month

45/38.2

1.18 (0.86–1.57)

61/51.8

1.18 (0.90–1.51)

17/13.7

1.24 (0.72–1.99)

11/14.1

0.78 (0.39–1.39)

1–11 months

65/69.3

0.94 (0.72–1.20)

106/94.1

1.13 (0.92–1.36)

31/22.8

1.36 (0.92–1.93)

20/22.8

0.88 (0.54–1.36)

1–4 years

54/52.5

1.03 (0.77–1.34)

52/72.9

0.71 (0.53–0.94)

16/14.2

1.13 (0.64–1.83)

9/13.3

0.68 (0.31–1.28)

5–9 years

27/35.8

0.75 (0.50–1.10)

46/45.7

1.01 (0.74–1.34)

4/9.1

0.44 (0.12–1.12)

7/5.9

1.20 (0.48–2.46)

≥ 10 years

5/2.5

2.03 (0.65–4.74)

0/2.8

-

9/9.0

1.00 (0.46–1.90)

7/9.6

0.73 (0.29–1.51)

Total

196/198.3

0.99 (0.85–1.14)

265/267.2

0.99 (0.88–1.12)

77/68.8

1.12 (0.88–1.40)

54/65.6

0.82 (0.62–1.07)

Of the 90 cases of breast cancer, 11 were employed for less than one month, with an increased SIR of 1.97 (95% CI: 0.98–3.52). Workers with breast cancer who were first employed prior to 1974 (19.6 ± 6.1 years old) were younger at the time of their first employment and were employed for longer periods; furthermore, at the time of their diagnosis, these workers were older than those who had first been employed after 1974, as shown in Table 4.
Table 4

Comparison of frequency distributions between two breast cancer groups, by date of first employment

 

Date of First Employment

 

Before 20 June 1974 (n = 90)

After 20 June 1974 (n = 196)

 

Mean

SD

Range (years)

Mean

SD

Range (years)

Age at Diagnosis

44.3

7.1

31–70

42.6

6.9

30–63

Age at First Employment*

19.6

6.1

14–46

22.4

6.3

14–43

Length of Employment*

7.8

7.5

0.005–25

4.8

6.5

0.008–18.5

Note: * indicates p < 0.001 by Student t-test

Discussion

Although we found an increased risk of breast cancer amongst young female workers first employed prior to 1974 (as shown in Table 3), it does not necessarily follow that such an association is causal, since our data did not allow for the control of potential confounders, including exposure to ionizing radiation [2628], smoking [29], alcohol consumption [30, 31], menopause after the age of 55 [32], low parity [3338], late first pregnancy [3941], and a positive family history [4244]. Thus, careful scrutiny of the findings should be undertaken prior to drawing any conclusions on the association.

Following promulgation, on 16 April 1974, Article 12 of the Labor Safety and Health Act in Taiwan, required every worker to undergo a pre-employment physical examination, which included a chest roentgenography. Female workers first employed in Taiwan prior to 1975 were therefore less likely to be exposed to ionizing radiation than those whose employment began later; thus, it seemed unlikely that the hypothesis of increased ionizing radiation was a potential confounder within this association. Similarly, according to the regular survey data undertaken by the Tobacco and Wine Monopoly Bureau, the smoking and alcohol consumption rates of adult women were relatively low in the early-1970s; there has, however, been an increasing trend over the last three decades for alcohol but not for smoking, as illustrated in Figure 1[45, 46]. Therefore, it also seems unlikely that either smoking or alcohol consumption were potential confounders in this study.

Of the 286 cases of breast cancer in females, one was below 30 age group, 101 were in the 30–39 age group, 144 were in the 40–49 age group and the remaining 40 cases were in the above 50 age group. Thus, menopause after the age of 50 cannot explain the increased risk. Moreover, since the age of bearing a first child has tended to shift over the past three decades, from 20–24 years to 25–29 years, or even into the early-thirties (Figure 1), the likelihood of a late first pregnancy for women first employed prior to 1974 was also lower [47]. It therefore appears that family history was the only factor we were unable to rule out.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-7-102/MediaObjects/12889_2006_Article_713_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Prevalence rates for smoking and drinking in female adults (percentage of left-hand side), and the proportion of births of first offspring to mothers aged 20–24 years (percentage of right-hand side) in Taiwan, 1972–2001 [45-47].

Historically, a higher socioeconomic status (SES) has been reported to be associated with increased breast cancer verified by a number of epidemiological studies, but few previous studies could adjust for all relevant potential confounding factors. Braaten et al. suggested that this positive gradient in risk for breast cancer can be fully explained by established breast cancer risk factors [48]. Although there was no information on level of education from the BLI database of original cohort, we still retrieved relevant educational data of 47,348 workers (74%) by linking to the Taiwan Birth Registration Database that began in 1978 [49]. The proportions of senior high and senior vocational schools for female workers were significantly higher than general female adults, as summarized in Figure 2. Based on the employees' earnings survey of Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, the income of female workers in electronics manufacturing were above the average in the early 1970s [50], which was raised from 124 to 486 US dollars during the period between 1978 and 1988. As this factory is invested and owned by multinational enterprise, the wages were even higher than average electronics [22]. On the contrary, female workers in this factory were in a higher socioeconomic class, which might be explanatory to the decreased morbidity due to thyroid cancer, as was also found by Levi et al [51]. And there might still be possibility of residual confounding by SES for increased risk of breast cancer.

Since this study used the same dataset of cancer registry to link both the exposed cohort and the comparison cohort, and since it ensured that all cancer cases were ascertained, there was very good comparability in the collection of information; thus, any selection bias was minimal, or indeed negligible. Moreover, although we do not have the actual exposure data, random misclassification generally leads toward null [52]. The assumptions of the first and last dates of employment for missing values would also generally lead to an underestimation of SIR.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-7-102/MediaObjects/12889_2006_Article_713_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Proportion of senior high and vocational schools or above of 47,348 female workers in comparison with general female adults in Taiwan, 1978–1988 [49].

Throughout its period of operation, a wide range of solvents were used within this factory [53, 54], including isopropyl alcohol (IPA), acetone, methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), cleaner, cobehn spray (trichloromethane, TCA) and 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and trichloroethylene (TCE). Furthermore, TCE was once used extensively for degreasing and cleaning [22, 53], with our prior qualitative study indicating that many female workers had used the abovementioned CA on a daily basis prior to 1974, for cleaning dirt off clothes, wiping job utensils and tabletops, and even for washing their hands [22].

The factory's labor inspection records also indicated that: (i) the wind speed of the factory ventilation system was too slow to exhaust the fumes; (ii) workers were not educated fully about solvent toxicity; and (iii) only cotton gloves were provided by the company for protection against skin contact [2]. Furthermore, as reported in Table 5, TCE was no longer cited in the records after 1974. Thus, we suspect that exposure was generally quite heavy, with the increased SIR in workers employed for more than 10 year also corroborating the biological plausibility.
Table 5

Solvents appearing in the company's monthly magazines and labor inspection records between August 1973 and May 1991, sorted by priority dates

Period of Use

Citations of Solvents in Use

Before 20 June 1974

1. Trichloroethylene [53] (Aug/Sep 1973)

After 20 June 1974

1. Isopropyl alcohol [2,54]

 

2. Acetone [2,54]

 

3. Methyl ethyl ketone [2,54]

 

4. Trichloromethane [54]

 

5. Methylene chloride [2]

 

6. Toluene [2]

 

7. Petroleum naphtha [2]

 

8. N-hexane [2]

 

9. Ethyl acetate [2]

 

10. Methyl alcohol [2]

 

11. 1,2, – dichloroethylene [2]

 

12. 1,1,1, – trichloroethane [2]

 

13. 1,2, – dichloroethane [2]

 

14. 1,1,2, – trichloroethane [2]

 

15. Tetrachloroethylene [2]

An extensive review suggests an association of TCE exposure with kidney cancer, liver cancer, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma as well as for cervical cancer, Hodgkin's disease, and multiple myeloma [55]. All of above cancers were analyzed in our study but no increase of SIR has been found. The analysis is also limited by the lack of detailed exposure information.

After stratification by the year of first employment, the SIR for breast cancer increased from 1.09 to 1.38 (Table 3); if allowing 10 years of employment, this increased further to 1.62 (95% CI: 1.02–2.42). Since the cancer registry database was only available for the period up to 2001, any workers whose first employment was after 1986 were not eligible for inclusion within the cohort if a latent period of 15 years was taken into consideration. Thus, we tentatively conclude that an association does exist for the period prior to 1974, when CA was in use, and that there is a need for continued follow-up to further examine this association.

Conclusion

Due to the lack of detailed information on the early-1970s, we can make only limited inferences with regard to overall exposure. Based upon our in-depth review of formal inspection records [2], and the monthly magazines published by the company [53, 54], we find that the only organic solvent under strict regulation which no longer appeared after 1974, was TCE (Table 5). We therefore suspect that TCE, and/or its mixtures, may be the most likely agent responsible for our findings. However, our results should be interpreted with caution since it is clear that co-exposure to other solvents did occur amongst our subjects.

In summary, there was a significantly increased risk of breast cancer amongst female workers within this factory prior to the introduction of strict regulations on the use of CA in all workplaces. Such risks were more prominent amongst female workers entering the workforce prior to 1974. However, our inference is limited by the lack of individual information on both the intensity of occupational exposure and family history.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Institute of Occupational Safety and Health of the Council of Labor Affairs, Executive Yuan of Taiwan, for supplying the computer data files and for providing assistance on exposure classification. We are also indebted to Dr. S.M. Liou and Dr. Y.M. Chang for providing constructive comments during the preparation of this manuscript. This study was supported by a special grant from the Bureau of Health Promotion, Department of Health and another grant from the National Health Research Institutes (NHRI-EX95-9204PP).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Occupational Medicine and Industrial Hygiene, National Taiwan University College of Public Health
(2)
Center for Health Risk Assessment and Policy, National Taiwan University College of Public Health
(3)
Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital
(4)
Department of Public Health, National Taiwan University College of Public Health
(5)
Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital

References

  1. LaDou J: The export of hazardous industries to newly industrialized countries. Polish journal of occupational medicine and environmental health. 1992, 5 (3): 223-226.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Taiwan Labor Inspection of the Northern District of the Labor Department and the Inspection Committees of Industrial and Mining: Records of Labor Inspections. Provincial Government. Taipei, June 1975 to May 1991.
  3. Bechtel Environmental, Inc.: 1990 Preliminary Site Investigation Report. Taoyuan Site, Taiwan, ROC. 1995, San Francisco: Bechtel Environmental, IncGoogle Scholar
  4. Target Environmental Services, Inc.: Soil Gas/Perched Groundwater/Soil Survey. Taoyuan Site, Taiwan, ROC. 1995, Columbia: Target Environmental Services, Inc;Google Scholar
  5. Hazardous Substance Release and Health Effects Database (HazDat Database). [http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/hazdat.html]
  6. Lee LJ, Chan CC, Chung CW, Ma YC, Wang GS, Wang JD: Health risk assessment on residents exposed to chlorinated hydrocarbons contaminated in groundwater of a hazardous waste site. Journal of toxicology and environmental health. 2002, 65 (3–4): 219-235.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lee LJ, Chung CW, Ma YC, Wang GS, Chen PC, Hwang YH, Wang JD: Increased mortality odds ratio of male liver cancer in a community contaminated by chlorinated hydrocarbons in groundwater. Occupational and environmental medicine. 2003, 60 (5): 364-369. 10.1136/oem.60.5.364.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang YM, Tai CF, Lin RS, Yang SC, Chen CJ, Shih TS, Liou SH: A proportionate cancer morbidity ratio study of workers exposed to chlorinated organic solvents in Taiwan. Industrial health. 2003, 41 (2): 77-87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang YM, Tai CF, Yang SC, Chen CJ, Shih TS, Lin RS, Liou SH: A cohort mortality study of workers exposed to chlorinated organic solvents in Taiwan. Annals of epidemiology. 2003, 13 (9): 652-660. 10.1016/S1047-2797(03)00038-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang YM, Tai CF, Yang SC, Lin RS, Sung FC, Shih TS, Liou SH: Cancer incidence among workers potentially exposed to chlorinated solvents in an electronics factory. Journal of occupational health. 2005, 47 (2): 171-180. 10.1539/joh.47.171.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Labreche FP, Goldberg MS: Exposure to organic solvents and breast cancer in women: a hypothesis. American journal of industrial medicine. 1997, 32 (1): 1-14. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199707)32:1<1::AID-AJIM1>3.0.CO;2-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Russo J, Tay LK, Russo IH: Differentiation of the mammary gland and susceptibility to carcinogenesis. Breast cancer research and treatment. 1982, 2 (1): 5-73. 10.1007/BF01805718.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Colditz GA, Frazier AL: Models of breast cancer show that risk is set by events of early life: prevention efforts must shift focus. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1995, 4 (5): 567-571.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang FI, Kuo ML, Shun CT, Ma YC, Wang JD, Ueng TH: Chronic toxicity of a mixture of chlorinated alkanes and alkenes in ICR mice. Journal of toxicology and environmental health. 2002, 65 (3–4): 279-291.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall P, Adami HO: Thyroid cancer. Textbook of Cancer Epidemiology. Edited by: Adami HO, Hunter D, Trichopoulos D. 2002, New York: Oxford University Press, 514-Google Scholar
  16. Crump KS: Risk of benzene-induced leukemia predicted from the Pliofilm cohort. Environmental health perspectives. 1996, 104 (Suppl 6): 1437-1441. 10.2307/3433200.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Aschengrau A, Rogers S, Ozonoff D: Perchloroethylene-contaminated drinking water and the risk of breast cancer: additional results from Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA. Environmental health perspectives. 2003, 111 (2): 167-173.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Hansen J: Breast cancer risk among relatively young women employed in solvent-using industries. American journal of industrial medicine. 1999, 36 (1): 43-47. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199907)36:1<43::AID-AJIM6>3.0.CO;2-A.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rothman KJ, Poole C: Causation and causal inference. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. Edited by: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF. 1996, New York: Oxford University Press, 7-Google Scholar
  20. Dos Santos Silva I: Principles and methods. Cancer Epidemiology. Edited by: Dos Santos Silva I. 1999, Lyon, France: IARC, 260-Google Scholar
  21. Rothman KJ: Induction and latent periods. American journal of epidemiology. 1981, 114 (2): 253-259.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Taiwan Bureau of Health Promotion: Literature Evaluation and Policy Analysis of Health Care for RCA Employees. 2003, Taipei: Department of Health, Executive Yuan, ROCGoogle Scholar
  23. Ko YC, Lin YC: Observations on the deaths amongst employees in an electronic appliance assembly factory. The Formosan Science. 1997, 31: 81-86.Google Scholar
  24. Taiwan Ministry of the Interior, Executive Yuan, ROC: Taiwan Labor Safety and Health Law: Safety and Health Installations Act of 1974. 2003Google Scholar
  25. PC Life Table Analysis System. [http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ltindex.html]
  26. Mackenzie I: Breast cancer following multiple fluoroscopies. British journal of cancer. 1965, 19: 1-8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Simon N, Silverstone SM: Radiation as a cause of breast cancer. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine. 1976, 52 (7): 741-751.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Boice JD, Monson RR: Breast cancer in women after repeated fluoroscopic examinations of the chest. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1977, 59 (3): 823-832.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Baron JA: Smoking and estrogen-related disease. American journal of epidemiology. 1984, 119 (1): 9-22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Howe G, Rohan T, Decarli A, Iscovich J, Kaldor J, Katsouyanni K, Marubini E, Miller A, Riboli E, Toniolo P, et al: The association between alcohol and breast cancer risk: evidence from the combined analysis of six dietary case-control studies. International journal of cancer. 1991, 47 (5): 707-710. 10.1002/ijc.2910470514.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Reichman ME, Judd JT, Longcope C, Schatzkin A, Clevidence BA, Nair PP, Campbell WS, Taylor PR: Effects of alcohol consumption on plasma and urinary hormone concentrations in premenopausal women. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1993, 85 (9): 722-727. 10.1093/jnci/85.9.722.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Trichopoulos D, MacMahon B, Cole P: Menopause and breast cancer risk. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1972, 48 (3): 605-613.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gilliam AG: Fertility and cancer of the breast and of the uterine cervix; comparisons between rates of pregnancy in women with cancer at these and other sites. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1951, 12 (2): 287-304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Stocks P: The epidemiology of carcinoma of the breast. The Practitioner. 1957, 179 (1071): 233-240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Segi M, Fukushima I, Fujisaku S, Kurihara M, Saito S, Asano K, Kamoi M: An epidemiological study on cancer in Japan; the report of the Committee for Epidemiological Study on Cancer, sponsored by the Ministry of Welfare and Public Health (Chairman: Dr. Tomosaburo Ogata). Gan. 1957, 48 (Suppl): 1-63.Google Scholar
  36. Wynder EL, Bross IJ, Hirayama T: A study of the epidemiology of cancer of the breast. Cancer. 1960, 13: 559-601. 10.1002/1097-0142(196005/06)13:3<559::AID-CNCR2820130322>3.0.CO;2-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Levin ML, Sheehe PR, Graham S, Glidewell O: Lactation and menstrual function as related to cancer of the breast. American journal of public health and the nation's health. 1964, 54: 580-587.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaplan SD, Acheson RM: A single etiological hypothesis for breast cancer?. Journal of chronic diseases. 1966, 19 (11): 1221-1230. 10.1016/0021-9681(66)90020-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. MacMahon B, Cole P, Lin TM, Lowe CR, Mirra AP, Ravnihar B, Salber EJ, Valaoras VG, Yuasa S: Age at first birth and breast cancer risk. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1970, 43 (2): 209-221.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Henderson BE, Powell D, Rosario I, Keys C, Hanisch R, Young M, Casagrande J, Gerkins V, Pike MC: An epidemiologic study of breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1974, 53 (3): 609-614.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lilienfeld AM, Coombs J, Bross ID, Chamberlain A: Marital and reproductive experience in a community-wide epidemiological study of breast cancer. The Johns Hopkins medical journal. 1975, 136 (4): 157-162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Macklin MT: Comparison of the number of breast-cancer deaths observed in relatives of breast-cancer patients, and the number expected on the basis of mortality rates. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1959, 22 (5): 927-951.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Lilienfeld AM: The epidemiology of breast cancer. Cancer research. 1963, 23: 1503-1513.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Papadrianos E, Haagensen CD, Cooley E: Cancer of the breast as a familial disease. Annals of surgery. 1967, 165 (1): 10-19.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Taiwan Bureau of Health Promotion: The Framework of the Smoking Control Plan. 2002, Taipei: Department of Health, Executive Yuan, ROCGoogle Scholar
  46. Taiwan Tobacco and Wine Monopoly Bureau: Taiwan-FuKien Tobacco and Wine Market Survey. 1972, Taichung: Taiwan Provincial GovernmentGoogle Scholar
  47. Taiwan Ministry of the Interior: Taiwan-FuKien Demographic Fact Book. 1975, Taipei: Executive Yuan, ROCGoogle Scholar
  48. Braaten T, Weiderpass E, Kumle M, Adami HO, Lund E: Education and risk of breast cancer in the Norwegian-Swedish women's lifestyle and health cohort study. International journal of cancer. 2004, 110 (4): 579-583. 10.1002/ijc.20141.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Taiwan Ministry of the Interior: Household Registration Statistical Data in Taiwan-Fuchien Area. 1978, Taipei: Executive Yuan, ROCGoogle Scholar
  50. Taiwan Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics: Employees' Earnings Survey. 1978, Taipei: Executive Yuan, ROCGoogle Scholar
  51. Levi F, Negri E, La Vecchia C, Te VC: Socioeconomic groups and cancer risk at death in the Swiss Canton of Vaud. International journal of epidemiology. 1988, 17 (4): 711-717. 10.1093/ije/17.4.711.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Rothman KJ, Greenland S: Precision and validity in epidemiological studies. Modern Epidemiology. Edited by: Rothman KJ, Greenland S. 1998, Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 127-132. SecondGoogle Scholar
  53. Radio Corporation of America: A magazine for RCA Taiwan employees. RCA Family. 1973, Aug/Sep:Google Scholar
  54. Radio Corporation of America: A magazine for RCA Taiwan employees. RCA Family. 1977, Jan/Feb:Google Scholar
  55. Wartenberg D, Reyner D, Scott CS: Trichloroethylene and cancer: epidemiologic evidence. Environmental health perspectives. 2000, 108 (Suppl 2): 161-176.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/7/102/prepub

Copyright

© Sung et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement