Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Tissue classification for the epidemiological assessment of surgical transmission of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. A proposal on hypothetical risk levels

  • Alberto Rábano1,
  • Jesús de Pedro-Cuesta2Email author,
  • Kåre Mølbak3,
  • Åke Siden4,
  • Miguel Calero5,
  • Henning Laursen6 and
  • the EUROSURGYCJD Research Group
BMC Public Health20055:9

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-9

Received: 28 June 2004

Accepted: 24 January 2005

Published: 24 January 2005

Abstract

Background

Epidemiological studies on the potential role of surgery in Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease transmission have disclosed associations with history of specific surgical interventions or reported negative results.

Methods

Within the context of a case-control study designed to address surgical risk of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease in Nordic European countries (EUROSURGYCJD Project), a strategy was adopted to categorise reported surgical procedures in terms of potential risk of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease acquisition. We took into account elements of biological plausibility, either clinically or experimentally demonstrated, such as tissue infectivity, PrP expression content or successful route of infection.

Results

We propose a classification of exposed tissues and anatomic structures, drawn up on the basis of their specific putative role as entry site for prion transmission through contact with surgical instruments that are not fully decontaminated.

Conclusions

This classification can serve as a reference, both in our study and in further epidemiological research, for categorisation of surgical procedures in terms of risk level of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease acquisition.

Background

Case-control research on the association between surgery and sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) encompasses six studies and one meta-analysis [18], which frequently yielded diverging, partly inconsistent, positive [5, 6] or negative [7, 8] results, potentially attributable to methodological difficulties. This paper constitutes the first part of methods development for a case-control study summarily described in the Methods/Design section. "Development" in this sense refers to theoretical development built on scientific evidence and will focus on classification of surgical procedures, using technical and biological criteria appropriate for identifying characteristics of the intervention reflecting the putative risk level of sporadic CJD transmission.

Methods

In this section, we summarily describe the on-going study, review reports that possibly shed light on the biological plausibility of surgery-related CJD transmission, and propose principles for re-classification of surgical procedures.

Study design

The on-going case-control study, entitled "Surgery and risk of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease" (EUROSURGYCJD), constitutes a Concerted Action funded by the EU Research Commission, contract QLG3-CT-2002-81223. The main objective of this study is to quantify a putative excess risk of CJD associated with surgery. A secondary objective is to establish a basis for the design of preventive strategies. The most relevant methodological characteristics are: case-control design; exposure measurement prior to disease onset, registered as codes for surgical procedures; matched 5:1, randomly chosen population controls and random sample of population controls. The population base is the resident population in Denmark, Finland and Sweden, covered by the respective hospital in-patient registers. Cases are individuals with diagnoses corresponding to ICD-9 codes 046.1 and 331.5 and ICD-10 code A81.0 at death or at hospital discharge for the period 1987–2002, identified from the respective national hospital in-patient registers and corresponding national surveillance units. A questionnaire will be mailed to the heads of the registered hospital department or surveillance unit, and a copy of the medical record will be obtained for diagnosis validation. Approximately 300 patients will fulfil criteria for definite or probable sporadic CJD, and constitute the study cases. Population controls are: 1) 5 × 1 controls (approximately 1500), matched to the corresponding case by age, sex, county of residence of the case (at first discharge from hospital with CJD diagnosis or death if never hospitalised with CJD diagnosis); and 2) a 20/million sample of the 1987–2002 resident population aged >40 years, randomly selected from the corresponding national population registers.

Individual person-numbers will be used for each resident case or control. Diagnoses and surgical procedures at hospital discharge of the corresponding CJD case at any registered time before date of death will be obtained from the three national hospital discharge registers in Sweden, Denmark and Finland. Perusal of surgical records might be undertaken for selected associations in order to understand transmission mechanisms and interpret results. Open-care surgery or dentistry will not be studied. Surgical procedures coded in registers as per national or NOMESCO classifications will be re-classified in accordance with putative levels of transmission risk based on scientific evidence/plausibility.

The quality of CJD diagnoses will be assessed by a review of medical records. The accuracy of surgical history given by the registers will be assessed by comparison with that of a sample of controls and surrogate respondents obtained by interview.

Centralised data analyses will be conducted by the Spanish team. In specific instances, risk due to blood transfusion, whether or not performed during surgical procedures, might also be studied.

Review of reports and proposal

Surgery may be a pathway for patient-to-patient transmission of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD). In many invasive surgical procedures, non-disposable surgical instruments come in contact with tissues that are known to be infective in CJD patients. These same instruments may retain a considerable level of infectivity after routine sterilisation, and in successive patients can come into contact with tissues that may act as entry sites for CJD transmission. Among the almost 300 recorded cases of iatrogenic transmission of CJD, 5 cases have been attributed to surgical instruments employed in neurosurgical procedures, whilst 2 additional cases were caused by the use of a contaminated intracerebral EEG electrode [9]. To date, proven surgical transmission of CJD has only been shown to have taken place through instruments contaminated with high-infectivity tissues (brain). However, stainless steel instruments exposed to infective tissue can acquire a maximum load of infectivity in a considerably short period of time (5 minutes) and are highly efficient in transmitting disease even after thorough washing [10]. The possibility of prion transmission through surgical interventions involving nervous or peripheral tissue has raised concern about decontaminating procedures, particularly after the emergence of variant CJD in the United Kingdom and several other countries [11].

In the above-mentioned studies [17], surgical procedures have been grouped and analysed according to gross anatomical regions (e.g., thyroid, gallbladder, prostate, etc.), which limits an interpretation of results based on biological inference. For a surgical instrument to act as a vehicle of prion transmission, it should come into contact with infective tissue during surgery of the "donor" (contaminating procedure), should maintain any adhered infectivity after being washed and sterilised, and, finally, should make contact with receptive tissues in the "recipient" patient (transmitting procedure). Different surgical interventions on the same organ may result in direct exposure of different tissues to surgical instruments, and may consequently involve a different risk of prion transmission. Within the context of a case-control study designed to address surgical risk in sporadic CJD in Nordic European countries (EUROSURGYCJD Project), we adopted the strategy of categorising all reported surgical procedures (putative transmitting procedures) in terms of potential risk of CJD acquisition. For this purpose, a classification of exposed tissues and anatomic structures has been drawn up on the basis of their specific putative role as entry site for prion transmission through surgical instruments. This classification can serve, both in our study and in further epidemiological studies, as a reference for a categorisation of surgical procedures in terms of risk of CJD acquisition.

According to the "protein only" hypothesis [12], pathogenic prion protein (PrPSc) is a conformational isoform of PrPC, a normal host protein present in neurons and other cell types. In sporadic and familial transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), "spontaneous" conversion of PrPC into PrPSc is the key pathogenic event, followed by the accumulation, deposition and further conversion of PrPSc in tissues, together with its propagation along specific neural pathways. In the case of transmitted TSEs -when these are not due to direct inoculation into the CNS- a peripheral phase of neuroinvasion by PrPSc is followed by a subsequent phase of prion replication and propagation along the peripheral nervous system, with final access to the central nervous system [13]. In scrapie, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) and variant CJD, neuroinvasion follows widespread deposition of PrPSc in mucosae-associated lymphoid tissue. For the purpose of classifying tissues susceptible to prion inoculation, the following considerations can be derived from this pathogenic model: i) a tissue can act as entry site for prion transmission if it normally expresses PrPC; ii) the level of PrPSc expression of an infected tissue correlates positively with the risk of prion acquisition by that tissue; and, iii) all tissues involved in the propagation chain of infection from peripheral tissues to the central nervous system can act as entry sites for prion transmission.

The recently published WHO classification of tissue infectivity in TSEs [14], though aimed at public health issues radically different from those addressed in our study, may nonetheless serve as a conceptual framework for a tissue classification in terms of risk level of prion acquisition. This approach is based on our above-mentioned assumption (ii). The WHO classification groups tissues in three levels (high, lower and no detected infectivity) on the basis of bioassay infectivity data and/or detection of PrPSc by Western blot. This three-level classification correlates quite closely with the distribution and levels of PrPC expression in normal nervous and non-nervous tissues in mammals.[15] The WHO tissue classification presents data on vCJD, other human TSEs, BSE and scrapie. Since no vCJD cases have been registered in Nordic countries, our epidemiological study must be limited to sporadic CJD. Consequently, our working classification excludes all tissues where positive data on infectivity or PrPSc detection have been obtained exclusively in animal TSEs and/or vCJD. This is the case of the small bowel, large bowel (including enteric nerve plexuses), adrenal tissue, pancreas and bone marrow.

Further relevant data for tissue classification derive from iatrogenic CJD cases and from experimental transmission of prion diseases to animals. In roughly half of iCJD cases the entry site has been the CNS or the eye (dura mater transplants, neurosurgical instruments or devices, corneal transplants), whilst in the other half, injection of pituitary hormones means that a peripheral route of entry has to be assumed [9]. Experimental efficiency of prion disease transmission to animals depends on various factors, such as the inoculum dose, the species barrier between the species of origin of the inoculum and the host, and the route of administration, among others. Under the same experimental conditions, different routes of administration show different efficacy of disease transmission, in terms of length of incubation period and percentage of infected animals [16, 17]. While the most efficient route of transmission is intracerebral administration, other routes, such as intraperitoneal, intraneural, intraocular, intravenous, subcutaneous and intramuscular administration, have been used successfully in bioassays and other experimental models [18]. Still other routes, such as oral administration and conjunctival instillation [19], have shown a lower efficiency of transmission. Accordingly, clinical and experimental evidence includes several routes of prion transmission that cannot be easily reduced to a simple tissue classification involving tissues of known infectivity in CJD and/or expression of PrPC under normal conditions. This is the case of anterior ophthalmic tissues, skeletal muscle, peritoneum, and subcutaneous tissue rich in sensitive nerve fibres. These anatomical structures have therefore been independently added to our classification as putative routes of entry, with a lower level of risk compared to the high level represented by the central nervous system, sensitive ganglia and posterior eye tissues. The fact that PrPSc has been recently found in 1/4 skeletal muscle samples of sCJD cases[20] prompted us to classify it as a tissue for potential entry rather than a route.

A final classification of entry sites for putative surgical transmission of CJD contains tissues, including all those showing positive results for sporadic and familial CJD in the WHO classification [14], with minor additions (tonsil and thymus), and maintains the three risk levels of the original classification along with several putative routes of entry, based on clinical and experimental evidence (see Table 1).
Table 1

Proposed classification of entry sites for putative surgical transmission of CJD by risk level.

Risk level

Tissues

Anatomical structures / routes

High

Brain

Spinal cord

Retina, optic nerve

Spinal ganglia

Trigeminal ganglia

Pituitary gland

Dura matera

 

Lower

Peripheral nervesb

Spleen

Lymph nodesc

Tonsild

Thymusd

Placenta

Lung

Liver

Kidney

Blood vesselse

Olfactory mucosa

CSF

Skeletal muscle

Anterior ophthalmic

Peritoneum

Subcutaneous (high density of sensitive nerve terminals)f

Lowest

Other

Other

aDura mater does not contain pathological PrP in CJD patients and its infectivity has not been tested. It is included among high-infectivity tissues in the WHO classification because of evidence of iatrogenic transmission through dura mater grafts.11The same rationale has been applied to its inclusion in the present table.

bOnly surgical procedures on peripheral nerves (e.g., amputation, vagotomy, etc.) will be classified according to this tissue.

cSurgical procedures that include this tissue as putative risk are those involving direct manipulation of lymph node chains, e.g., lymph node excision, oncological lymphadenectomy, and intra-abdominal procedures with extensive section of lymph node chains, such as cholecystectomy, gastrectomy and diverse types of bowel resection.

dAlthough tonsil and thymic tissue have yielded negative results for infectivity and presence of pathological PrP in sporadic CJD tissue (tonsillar tissue has not yet been tested for infectivity), they are included in the table in the lower level group, together with the spleen and lymph nodes for biological reasons, in order to assess the role of peripheral lymphoid tissue in surgical transmission.

eOnly procedures involving direct surgery on blood vessels will be classified according to this tissue.

fHand and facial subcutaneous tissue will be included under this heading.

Discussion

We propose a list intended to be used to generate attributes of single, well-defined surgical procedures and criteria for their classification in terms of putative risk level of transmission. The two main attributes will be: 1) use of non-disposable surgical instruments; and, 2) exposure during surgery of tissues included in the preceding list. High- and lower-risk surgical procedures will be defined by exposure of tissue corresponding to the respective risk level during surgery. In addition, the lowest risk level is represented by those surgical procedures where disposable surgical instruments are not employed or where no listed tissue or anatomical structure is exposed to surgical instruments.

A categorisation of surgical procedures based on the above attributes is inevitably prone to some degree of subjectivity, something that should be minimised by adequate methodological assessment. However, this drawback is more than offset by the possible benefits of identifying specific surgical procedures that pose a significant risk of CJD transmission, in terms of increased study power and control of misclassification of exposure by the removal of surgical procedures, which are probably irrelevant for CJD transmission, from gross anatomical classifications of surgery. We are also aware of the fact that whereas the same surgical instruments are commonly employed in an homogeneous group of procedures in some countries, as is the case of Nordic countries, the same instruments may circulate through a much wider range of procedures and putative risk levels in other countries. Final risk for disease transmission in each surgical procedure combines postulated risk related to tissues exposed in that procedure with the highest risk level of tissues to which instruments have been previously exposed. Accordingly, results should always be interpreted in the light of a known or assumed pattern of instrument circulation between surgical procedure groups. Finally, it is worth stressing that the aim of the approach presented here is exclusively to produce a useful tool for epidemiological research in CJD transmission. Under the present state of knowledge, no consequences for the possible adoption of any practical recommendation concerning surgery or further preventive measures are to be drawn from this approach.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The EUROSURGYCJD group members are grateful to Prof. Maurizio Pocchiari, Italy, for the substantial contribution to this proposal as regards his stance on the biological plausibility of surgical transmission of prion disorders, and to Maria José Bleda and Margarita Ramírez, Spain, for editorial help.

EUROSURGYCJD group members. Spanish team: Javier ALMAZÁN, María J. BLEDA, Miguel CALERO, Pablo MARTÍNEZ-MARTÍN, Jesús de PEDRO-CUESTA (P. Leader), Alberto RÁBANO. Danish team: Kåre MLBACK, Henning LAURSEN. Finnish team: Jussi KOVANEN. Swedish team: Åke SIDEN, Inger NENNESMO.

Consultant experts: Dr. Annick ALPEROVITCH, Prof. Paul BROWN, Prof. James IRONSIDE, Prof. Maurizio POCCHIARI, Prof. Robert G. WILL

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory of Neuropathology, Hospital de Alcorcón
(2)
Applied Epidemiology Department, National Centre of Epidemiology. Carlos III Institute of Health
(3)
Department of Epidemiology, Statens Serum Institut
(4)
Neurotec, Division of Neurology, Karolinska Institutet
(5)
Department of Spongiform Encephalopathies, National Centre of Microbiology. Carlos III Institute of Public Health, Ctra
(6)
Laboratory of Neuropathology

References

  1. Kondo K, Kuroiwa Y: A case control study of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: association with physical injuries. Ann Neurol. 1982, 11: 377-381. 10.1002/ana.410110410.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Davanipour Z, Alter M, Sobel E, Asher DM, Gajdusek DC: Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: possible medical risk factors. Neurology. 1985, 35: 1483-1486.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Harries-Jones R, Knight RSG, Will RG, Cousens SN, Smith PG, Matthews WB: Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in England and Wales, 1980-1984: a case-control study of potential risk factors. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988, 51: 1113-1119.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. van Duijn CM, Delasnerie-Lauprêtre N, Masullo C, Zerr I, de Silva R, Wientjens DPWM, Brandel JP, Weber T, Bonavita V, Zeidler M, Alpérovitch A, Poser S, Granieri E, Hofman A, Will RG: Case-control study of risk factors of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in Europe during 1993-95. Lancet. 1998, 351: 1081-1085. 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09468-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins S, Law MG, Fletcher A, Boyd A, Kaldor J, Masters CL: Surgical treatment and risk of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a case-control study. Lancet. 1999, 353: 693-697. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08138-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Zerr I, Brandel JP, Masullo C, Wientjens DPWM, de Silva R, Zeidler M, Granieri E, Sampaolo S, van Duijn CM, Delasnerie-Lauprêtre N, Will RG, Poser S: European surveillance on Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a case-control study for medical risk factors. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000, 53: 747-754. 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00207-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ward HJT, Everington D, Croes EA, Alpérovitch A, Delasnerie-Lauprêtre N, Zerr I, Poser CM, van Duijn CM: Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and surgery: a case-control study using community controls. Neurology. 2002, 59: 543-548.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wientjens DPWM, Davanipour Z, Hofman A, Kondo K, Matthews WB, Will RG, van Duijn CM: Risk factors for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a reanalysis of case-control studies. Neurology. 1996, 46: 1287-1291.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown P, Preece MA, Brandel JP, Sato T, McShane L, Zerr I, Fletcher A, Will RG, Pocchiari M, Cashman NR, Huillard d'Aignaux J, Cervenáková L, Fradkin J, Schonberger LB, Collins SJ: Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease at the millenium. Neurology. 2000, 55: 1075-1081. [http://www.neurology.org]View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Weissmann C, Enari M, Klohn PC, Rossi D, Flechsig E: Transmission of prions. J Infect Dis. 2002, 186 Suppl 2: S157-S165. 10.1086/344575.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Frosh A, Joyce R, Johnson A: Iatrogenic vCJD from surgical instruments: the risk is unknown, but improved decontamination will help reduce the risk. BMJ. 2001, 322: 1558-1559. 10.1136/bmj.322.7302.1558. [http://www.bmj.com]View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Prusiner SB: Scrapie prions. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1989, 43: 345-374. 10.1146/annurev.mi.43.100189.002021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Glatzel M, Aguzzi A: Peripheral pathogenesis of prion diseases. Microbes Infect. 2000, 2: 613-619. 10.1016/S1286-4579(00)00364-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. WHO guidelines on transmissible spongiform encephalopathies in relation to biological and pharmaceutical products. 2003, Geneva, World Health Organization, 1-26. WHO/BCT/QSD/03.01Google Scholar
  15. Ford MJ, Burton LJ, Morris RJ, Hall SM: Selective expression of prion protein in peripheral tissues of the adult mouse. Neuroscience. 2002, 113: 177-192. 10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00155-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kimberlin RH, Walker CA: Pathogenesis of scrapie (strain 263K) in hamsters infected intracerebrally, intraperitoneally or intraocularly. J Gen Virol. 1986, 67: 255-263.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Race R, Oldstone M, Chesebro B: Entry versus blockade of brain infection following oral or intraperitoneal scrapie administration:role of prion protein expressin in peripheral nerves and spleen. J Virol. 2000, 74: 828-833. 10.1128/JVI.74.2.828-833.2000.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Bradley R: Animal prion diseases. Prion diseases. Edited by: Collinge J and Palmer MS. 1997, Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Scott JR, Foster JD, Fraser H: Conjunctival instillation of scrapie in mice can produce disease. Vet Microbiol. 1993, 34: 305-309. 10.1016/0378-1135(93)90055-C.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Glatzel M, Abela E, Maissen M, Aguzzi A: Extraneural pathologic prion protein in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. N Engl J Med. 2003, 349: 1812-1820. 10.1056/NEJMoa030351.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/5/9/prepub

Copyright

© Rábano et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement