Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Socioeconomic and demographic predictors of selected cardiovascular risk factors among adults living in Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia

  • Gwendolyn M Hosey1Email author,
  • Marcus Samo2,
  • Edward W Gregg1,
  • Diane Padden3 and
  • Sandra Garmon Bibb3
BMC Public Health201414:895

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-895

Received: 18 November 2013

Accepted: 29 July 2014

Published: 31 August 2014

Abstract

Background

The burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is increasing in low-to-middle income countries (LMIC). Although strong evidence for inverse associations between socioeconomic position and health outcomes in high-income countries exists, less is known about LMIC. Understanding country-level differences is critical to tailoring effective population health policy and interventions. We examined the association of socioeconomic position and demographic characteristics in determining CVD risk factors among adults living in Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia.

Methods

We used data from the cross-sectional World Health Organization’s STEPwise approach to surveillance 2002 Pohnpei dataset and logistic regression analyses to examine the association of socioeconomic position (education, income, employment) and demographics (age, sex) with selected behavioral and anthropometric CVD risk factors. The study sample consisted of 1638 adults (642 men, 996 women; 25–64 years).

Results

In general, we found that higher education (≥13 years) was associated with lower odds for daily tobacco use (odds ratio [OR]: 0.46, confidence interval [CI]: 0.29–0.75, p = 0.004) and low physical activity (OR: 0.55, CI: 0.34–0.87, p = 0.027). Men had over three times the odds of daily tobacco use than women (OR: 3.18, CI: 2.29–4.43, p < 0.001). Among women, paid employment nearly doubled the odds of daily tobacco use (OR: 1.72, CI: 1.08–2.73, p = 0.006) than unemployment. For all participants, income > $10,000 was associated with over twice the odds of high blood pressure (BP) (OR: 2.24, CI: 1.43–3.51, p = 0.003), versus lower-income (<$5,000). Men had over twice the odds of high BP (OR: 2.01, CI: 1.43–2.83, p < 0.001) than women. Paid employment nearly doubled the odds of central obesity with the magnitude of association increasing by more than 20% adjusted for sex and age. Men reporting paid employment had three times the odds of central obesity (OR: 3.00, CI: 1.56–5.78, p < 0.001) than those unemployed.

Conclusion

Our analysis revealed associations between socioeconomic position and selected CVD risk factors, which varied by risk-factor, sex and age characteristics, and direction of association. The 2002 Pohnpei dataset provides country-level baseline information; further population health surveillance might define trends. Stronger country-level data might help decision-makers tailor population-based prevention strategies.

Keywords

Micronesia Health disparities Chronic disease Cardiovascular disease risk factors Health determinants

Background

Globally, more than 80% of cardiovascular disease (CVD) deaths occur in low- to middle-income countries (LMIC) [1, 2]. Moreover, in LMIC, 29% of deaths from chronic noncommunicable diseases occur before the age of 60 years, compared with 13% in high-income countries [1]. By 2030, three-quarters of all deaths worldwide (estimated) will be related to chronic noncommunicable diseases, exceeding the number of deaths from infectious diseases (including HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria), maternal and perinatal health complications, and nutritional disorders combined [3].

A complex interplay of sociodemographic trends, including population aging and economic change, explain the epidemiological transition from a burden of morbidity/mortality dominated by infectious disease to chronic disease [4]. Compared with the circumstances in high-income countries, in which burden has increased over the course of a century, the increase within LMIC is occurring more rapidly [5, 6]. Between 1990 and 2020, the age-specific ischemic heart disease mortality rate is projected to increase by 120% for women and 137% for men in LMIC, compared with increases of 30% for women and 60% for men in high-income countries (largely attributable to population growth of adults aged ≥65 years) [7].

For most high-income countries, recent decades have seen a decline in CVD mortality partly due to improved treatment and care, primary prevention, and declines in risk factors such as smoking [8, 9]. In LMIC, upward population-level trends in higher risk lifestyle behaviors (e.g., tobacco use, physical inactivity, and inadequate fruit and vegetable consumption) and the increasing prevalence of underlying metabolic risk factors (e.g., obesity, high blood pressure, dyslipidemia, and diabetes) are associated with increased burden of CVD [10, 11]. For example, mortality projections for 2030 indicate that seven in ten tobacco-related deaths worldwide would occur within LMIC [12]. Additionally, between 1998 and 2008, the largest increase in mean body mass index (BMI) worldwide rose 0.4 kg/m2 in men and 0.5 kg/m2 in women per decade (aged ≥20 years) with the largest rise in BMI (2.0 kg/m2 per decade) occurring in nine countries of Oceania (Australia, New Zealand, and Pacific Island Nations) [13].

Since 2002, the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) has been developing capacity for chronic disease surveillance; resultant data are available that may provide an opportunity for extending the understanding of country-level associations between socioeconomic position and CVD risk factors within LMIC. The World Bank classifies FSM as a LMIC with a gross domestic product income (GDP) at purchasing power parity of $3,165 per capita (2012 estimate [est.]), compared with $50,700 GDP per capita in the United States (2012 est.) [14]. FSM, a constitutional federation, with a Compact of Free Association with the United States, is composed of four island states: Chuuk, Kosrae, Pohnpei, and Yap (Figure 1).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-14-895/MediaObjects/12889_2013_Article_7004_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Map of the US Associated Pacific Island Jurisdictions, Federated States of Micronesia.

Research evidence, primarily from high-income countries, shows inverse relationships between socioeconomic position and CVD risk factors [1517]. Most studies conducted within LMIC have focused on geographic (i.e., north-south) and between-country differences, rather than on gaps between social groups within countries [18]. Understanding the country-level differences in associations between socioeconomic position and chronic noncommunicable disease is critical to tailoring effective population health policy and interventions aimed toward decreasing CVD risk factors within LMIC [19, 20]. Our research helps to fill that gap by describing the association between socioeconomic position and CVD risk factors in a population-based sample of the adult population living in Pohnpei, FSM.

Methods

Design

We performed a descriptive cross-sectional secondary analysis of data from the 2002 STEPwise approach to surveillance (STEPS) in Pohnpei [21]. Detailed STEPS design and methodology are available at: http://www.who.int/chp/steps/en/. The STEPS dataset, developed and administered by the World Health Organization (WHO), includes a sequential three-step process to collect information on risk factors for chronic diseases: 1) a personal interview, 2) anthropometric measurements, and 3) a biochemical assessment.

Prior to accessing the dataset, we completed an assessment of it for completeness and quality (Additional file 1) using established secondary analysis assessment criteria [2224] and publicly available STEPS metadata archives. Generally, the assessment showed that the dataset was appropriate for secondary analysis with adequate power, a representative sample, validated instrumentation, standardized data collection, and limited issues regarding missing data. Thus, we were able to use the dataset to provide reliable data necessary for the primary objective of this study.

Created sample and sample size considerations

The 2002 STEPS sampling process used a multistage, probabilistic, cluster design (based on 2000 Pohnpei census enumeration areas) to randomly select households for participation. Data were obtained from 1638 adults (78% response rate) aged 25–64 years. Sample size calculations and details related to sampling procedures used in collecting STEPS data for the primary study are reported elsewhere [21]. We included the entire 2002 STEPS Pohnpei dataset to ensure that the study sample was representative of the overall population.

Ethical considerations

Before we downloaded data, the Uniformed Services University Institutional Review Board and the FSM Department of Health and Social Affairs approved this study.

Study variables

Table 1 provides a summary of conceptual definitions and measures for the variables used in our study analyses. A brief description of outcome and predictor variables is provided below.
Table 1

Summary of variable names, conceptual definition, and measures using the 2002 STEPS Pohnpei, FSM data set

Variable

Conceptual definition

Measuresa

Socioeconomic position

Associated with an individual’s relative position within a social structure

Self-report of educational attainment, annual household income, occupation/employment

Demographic characteristics

Information concerning an individual’s age and sex

Age in years and sex

Behavioral characteristics

Information concerning an individual’s lifestyle behaviors associated with CVD risk (i.e., stroke, myocardial infarction, coronary artery or peripheral vascular disease)

Self-report of tobacco use (daily use smoke or smokeless), physical activity (moderate level of physical activity [work, travel, leisure] on 5 or more days/ week)

Anthropometric characteristics

Information concerning an individual’s anthropometric features associated with CVD risk

Waist circumference (excluding pregnant women); mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure (calculated using last two of three BP)

Abbreviations: STEPS World Health Association STEPwise approach to surveillance, FSM Federated States of Micronesia, CVD Cardiovascular risk, BP Blood pressure.

aDetailed descriptions for measures used in this study available at World Health Association STEPwise approach to surveillance (STEPS) available at: http://www.who.int/chp/steps/en/.

Outcome variables

Cardiovascular risk factors

Data on four recognized CVD risk factors were used in our analysis: 1) daily tobacco use, 2) low physical activity, 3) high blood pressure (BP), and 4) central obesity (Table 1). Participants reporting daily tobacco use and a less-than-moderate level of physical activity (i.e., less than 30 minutes of activity, five or more days a week) were defined as being at risk [16]. We used the mean of the two most recent BP measurements to create systolic and diastolic BP variables. We considered participants to have high BP if they had a systolic value ≥140 mmHg or a diastolic value ≥90 mmHg; or if they reported a diagnosis of hypertension or if they reported using BP medication within the last year [25]. We defined central obesity as waist circumference >102 centimeters (cm) in men and >88 cm in women. These cut-off points for central obesity are associated with a substantially increased risk for one of three indicators of CVD risk: high blood pressure, diabetes, or hyperlipidemia [26].

Predictor variables

Socioeconomic position

We used self-reported educational attainment, estimated annual household income, and employment status as indicators of socioeconomic position. In addition to other benefits, income and employment status can also provide access to resources to promote health [15].

Education

Educational attainment is a preferred socioeconomic position indicator, as education can be determined for all individuals and is fairly stable after early adulthood. Additionally, education is a significant determinant of a person’s economic potential and acquisition of life-skills relative to adopting health-promoting behaviors [15]. Using self-report of years of education completed, we categorized participants into one of three educational-level groups: primary (<9 years), secondary (9–12 years), and postsecondary (≥13 years). Persons with a primary education were used as the reference group in the analysis.

Income

We included estimated annual household income in the analysis, categorizing participants into one of three groups: low (<$5,000), middle ($5,000–$10,000), or high income (>$10,000). For the analysis, persons in a household with low income < $5,000 were used as the reference group. An “unknown income” category was included to account for missing values for the income field in the primary dataset [27].

Employment status

For employment status, we categorized participants into one of three groups: paid, unpaid (i.e., retiree, volunteer, student, homemaker), and unemployed. For the analysis, persons who were unemployed were used as the reference group.

Covariates

We included sex and age in the analysis as covariates. The literature supports sex and age possibly being mediating or confounding factors in the association between socioeconomic position and CVD risk factors. Age and sex may affect risk factor prevalence through variations in both biological characteristics and societal influences that vary across societies [15, 28].

Statistical methods

Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0 complex samples module that accounts for the complex sampling design used in the STEPS survey, correctly calculating standard errors with weighted data. We applied sex-age structure survey weights (standardized to the FSM 2000 census for Pohnpei) to provide results representative of the adult Pohnpeian population aged 25–64 years. After data cleaning and recoding, we completed descriptive statistics for all study variables. We also completed exploratory analyses, using chi-square and one-way analysis of variance (with tests of normality and other assumptions and post-hoc comparisons) reported elsewhere [29]. Through this process, we identified the associations of socioeconomic position and demographic characteristics with outcome variables (using a priori probability value of <0.25, or had clinical relevance) for inclusion in the multivariate logistic regression models that this paper addresses.

We used multivariate logistic regression models to determine the extent to which socioeconomic position predicted CVD risk factors. First, we examined the crude associations between primary socioeconomic predictors (i.e., education, income, and employment) and each outcome measure. We also examined all three predictors and sex and age included as covariates. A priori, we also developed strata models based on evidence that sex and age may be confounding factors in the association between socioeconomic position and CVD risk factors [15, 28]. Magnitude of effect was calculated using the simple difference between crude and adjusted odds ratio estimates with values greater than 10% considered meaningful. Results were considered significant if p was less than 0.05 (p < 0.05).

Results

We provide selected characteristics of the sample dataset, collectively and stratified by sex, for the overall population (Table 2). Most respondents reported a primary-level education (<9 years) and incomes at < $5,000. More than one-half of the participants reported paid employment. Over one-third of male respondents reported daily tobacco use, and over one-third of female respondents had central obesity.
Table 2

Selected characteristics of sample by sex and collectively, using the 2002 STEPS Pohnpei, FSM data set a

Characteristic (measure)

Male n (%)

Female n (%)

Total sample n (%)

N

642

996

1638

Age range

25–34 y

176 (36.8)

321 (39.2)

496 (38.0)

35–44 y

187 (32.5)

313 (31.2)

500 (31.9)

45–54 y

184 (21.1)

247 (19.6)

431 (20.4)

55–64 y

 95 (09.5)

115 (10.0)

210 (09.8)

Education (highest level completed)

Primary (<9 y)

315 (52.2)

568 (59.1)

883 (55.6)

Secondary (9–12 y)

183 (31.4)

302 (34.1)

485 (32.7)

Post-secondary (≥13 y)

 99 (16.4)

 57 (06.8)

156 (11.6)

Income (estimated annual household)

Low (< $5,000)

298 (47.5)

486 (49.3)

784 (48.4)

Middle ($ 5,000–$10,000)

121 (18.4)

170 (16.8)

291 (17.6)

High (> $10,000)

 65 (09.1)

 93 (09.1)

158 (09.1)

Unknown

158 (25.0)

247 (24.7)

405 (24.9)

Employment b

Paid employment

409 (67.7)

324 (36.1)

733 (52.3)

Unpaid

 66 (09.8)

267 (29.2)

333 (19.3)

Unemployed

125 (22.5)

313 (34.6)

438 (28.4)

Behavioral c

Daily tobacco use

235 (37.7)

169 (16.7)

404 (27.3)

Low physical activity (<30 min/d, 5d/wk)

407 (72.6)

730 (88.6)

1137 (80.4)

Anthropometric

Central obesity (waist circumference: M > 102 cm; F > 88 cm)

171 (21.3)

255 (33.9)

426 (27.4)

High BP (≥140/90 mmHG, use of BP medication, or self-report of hypertension diagnosis within last year)

209 (29.3)

209 (19.2)

418 (24.3)

Abbreviations: FSM Federated States of Micronesia, N Number, y Years, d Day, wk Week, min Minutes, M Male, F Female, BP Blood pressure, cm Centimeters.

aUsing the 2002 STEPS Pohnpei, FSM data set; all estimates are sex–age standardized to the FSM 2000 Pohnpei Census; Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. Behavioral variables are self-report; anthropometric are direct measures; central obesity excludes pregnant women.

bUnpaid category includes student, homemaker, volunteer, or retired.

cDaily tobacco use includes daily use of cigarettes, cigars, pipes, or smokeless tobacco; physically active defined using computed score: intensity (i.e., moderate or vigorous), duration, or metabolic rate.

We display the results from the logistic regression models (unadjusted and sex-age adjusted) predicting cardiovascular disease risk factors (Table 3). For daily tobacco use, the unadjusted model showed significant associations for each socioeconomic predictor; although except for educational attainment, the estimates for income and employment status were not significant in the sex-age adjusted model. Men had more than three times the odds of reporting daily tobacco use (sex-age adjustment; odds ratio [OR]: 3.18, 95%, confidence interval [CI]: 2.29–4.43, p < 0.001). Participants reporting a postsecondary educational level were significantly less likely to report daily tobacco use, with the magnitude of effect decreasing by 14.8% for sex-age adjustment.
Table 3

Logistic regression analyses on association between socioeconomic demographic characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors, Pohnpei, FSM, 2002 a

Predictor (measure)

Model 1 main effects

Final model main effects sex-age adjusted

OR (95% CI)

p

OR (95% CI)

p

Daily tobacco use b

Education (highest level completed)

Primary (<9 y) (reference)

1

1

Secondary (9–12 y)

0.71 (0.51–0.98)

0.022

0.68 (0.49–0.95)

0.004

Post–secondary (≥13 y)

0.54 (0.33–0.86)

0.46 (0.29–0.75)

Income (estimated annual household)

Low (<$5,000) (reference)

1

1

Middle ($5,000–$10,000)

0.74 (0.47–1.17)

0.029

0.77 (0.50–1.20)

0.082

High (>$10,000)

0.46 (0.26–0.80)

0.50 (0.28–0.91)

Employment status c

Unemployed (reference)

1

1

Paid

1.76 (1.30–2.38)

< 0.001

1.33 (0.96–1.83)

0.201

Unpaid

0.90 (0.65–1.25)

1.10 (0.77–1.58)

Sex

Female

NA

1

Male

3.18 (2.29–4.43)

< 0.001

Age

<35 y (reference)

NA

1

35–44 y

1.50 (1.13–1.99)

< 0.001

45–54 y

1.25 (0.92–1.70)

>54 y

0.52 (0.30–0.91)

Low physical activity d

Education (highest level completed)

Primary (<9 y) (reference)

1

1

Secondary (9–12 y)

0.91 (0.68–1.22)

0.002

0.92 (0.68–1.23)

0.027

Post–secondary (≥13 y)

0.46 (0.29–0.73)

0.55 (0.34–0.87)

Income (estimated annual household)

Low (<$5,000) (reference)

1

1

Middle ($5,000–$10,000)

1.04 (0.67–1.61)

0.143

0.99 (0.62–1.60)

0.313

High (>$10,000)

1.63 (0.89–2.98)

1.47 (0.76–2.83)

Employment status c

Unemployed (reference)

1

1

Paid

1.08 (0.72–1.62)

0.045

1.35 (0.91–2.01)

0.158

Unpaid

1.94 (1.09–3.46)

1.60 (0.89–2.90)

Sex

Female

NA

1

Male

0.33 (0.23–0.47)

< 0.001

Age

<35 y (reference)

NA

1

35–44 y

1.00 (0.65–1.52)

0.018

45–54 y

1.75 (1.20–2.55)

>54 y

1.30 (0.77–2.18)

High BP e

Education (highest level completed)

Primary (<9 y) (reference)

1

1

Secondary (9–12 y)

0.62 (0.41–0.93)

0.049

0.76 (0.49–1.17)

0.402

Post–secondary (≥13 y)

0.72 (0.42–1.21)

0.80 (0.45–1.39)

Income (estimated annual household)

Low (<$5,000) (reference)

1

1

Middle ($5,000–$10,000)

1.19 (0.81–1.74)

< 0.001

1.06 (0.68–1.66)

0.003

High (>$10,000)

2.53 (1.74–3.68)

2.24 (1.43–3.51)

Employment status c

Unemployed (reference)

1

1

Paid

1.17 (0.94–1.45)

0.138

0.90 (0.69–1.17)

0.647

Unpaid

0.91 (0.59–1.42)

0.83 (0.52–1.32)

Sex

Female

NA

1

Male

2.01 (1.43–2.83)

< 0.001

Age

<35 y (reference)

NA

1

35–44 y

1.94 (1.30–2.90)

< 0.001

45–54 y

3.77 (2.57–5.51)

>54 y

6.08 (3.68–10.06)

 

Central obesity f

Education (highest level completed)

Primary (<9 y) (reference)

1

1

Secondary (9–12 y)

1.12 (0.86–1.45)

0.179

1.14 (0.88–1.47)

0.315

Post–secondary (≥13 y)

0.78 (0.52–1.16)

0.85 (0.56–1.31)

Income (estimated annual household)

Low (<$5,000) (reference)

1

1

Middle ($5,000–$10,000)

1.20 (0.82–1.75)

0.615

1.17 (0.79–1.72)

0.792

High (>$10,000)

1.28 (0.78–2.10)

1.21 (0.72–2.01)

Employment status c

Unemployed (reference)

1

1

Paid

1.57 (1.13–2.19)

0.001

1.90 (1.39–2.60)

< 0.001

Unpaid

1.60 (1.15–2.23)

1.47 (1.06–2.05)

Sex

Female

NA

1

Male

0.50 (0.35–0.71)

< 0.001

Age

<35 y (reference)

NA

1

35–44 y

0.82 (0.57–1.18)

0.111

45–54 y

1.09 (0.77–1.54)

>54 y

1.16 (0.68–1.98)

Abbreviations: FSM Federated States of Micronesia, BP Blood pressure, OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval, y Year, NA Not applicable.

aUsing the 2002 STEPS Pohnpei, FSM data set; all estimates are age–sex standardized to the FSM 2000 Pohnpei Census; p-values based on the Rao–Scott adjustment to χ2.

bDaily tobacco use includes daily use of cigarettes, cigars, pipes, or smokeless tobacco.

cUnpaid category includes student, homemaker, volunteer, or retired.

dPhysically inactive includes <30 minutes/day of moderate activity on five or more days/week.

eHigh BP defined as BP ≥ 140/90 mmHG, use of BP medication, or self–report of hypertension diagnosis.

fCentral obesity defined as waist circumference: Male > 102 cm; Female > 88 cm.

Significant inverse associations were found between low physical activity and postsecondary education, with the magnitude of effect weakened by 19.6% for sex-age adjustment. Compared with women, men had double the odds for high BP (OR: 2.01, CI: 1.43-2.83, p < 0.001). Participants reporting high income (>$10,000) had over twice the odds of high BP. Paid employment nearly doubled the odds of central obesity, with the magnitude of effect increasing by 21.0% for sex-age, compared with the unadjusted model (Table 3).

Table 4 shows results stratified by sex. For example, compared with unemployed women, women reporting paid employment had 1.72 times the odds (CI: 1.08–2.73, p = 0.006) of daily tobacco use and women reporting postsecondary education had significantly lower odds (OR: 0.17, CI: 0.04–0.76, p = 0.042) of daily tobacco use than those with a primary educational level. Men reporting a postsecondary educational level (OR: 0.50, CI: 0.28–0.88, p = 0.025) were significantly less likely to report low physical activity than those reporting a primary level. For men and women, odds of reporting high BP significantly increased by age group with over four times the odds for men aged 55–64 years as for men aged 25–34 years (OR: 4.58, CI: 2.41–8.71, p < 0.001) and women aged 55–64 years nearly 13 times the odds for high BP as those aged 25–34 years (OR: 12.98, CI: 5.29–31.86, p < 0.001). Women with high income had over twice the odds of high BP than those with low income (OR: 2.36, CI: 1.23–4.52, p < 0.001). Among men, paid employment was associated with a threefold increase in the odds for central obesity (OR: 3.00; CI: 1.56–5.78, p < 0.001).
Table 4

Sex-stratified logistic regression models on association between socioeconomic demographic characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors, Pohnpei, FSM, 2002 a

Predictor (measure)

Daily tobacco useb

Physically inactivec

High BPd

Central obesitye

OR (95% CI)

p

OR (95% CI)

p

OR (95% CI)

p

OR (95% CI)

p

Male

Education (highest level completed)

Primary (<9 y) (reference)

1

1

1

1

Secondary (9–12 y)

0.70 (0.46–1.06)

0.062

1.01 (0.63–1.64)

0.025

0.51 (0.28–0.91)

0.062

1.02 (0.58–1.79)

0.659

Post–secondary (≥13 y)

0.54 (0.32–0.93)

0.50 (0.28–0.88)

0.72 (0.34–1.41)

0.78 (0.41–1.50)

Income (estimated annual household)

Low (<$5,000) (reference)

1

1

1

1

Middle ($5,000–$10,000)

0.79 (0.42–1.51)

0.429

0.98 (0.54–1.79)

0.181

1.00 (0.59–1.71)

0.111

1.66 (0.83–3.35)

0.349

High (>$10,000)

0.53 (0.24–1.19)

1.95 (0.95–4.03)

2.00 (1.06–3.79)

1.59 (0.64–3.93)

Employment status b

        

Unemployed (reference)

1

1

1

1

Paid

1.26 (0.77–2.04)

0.140

1.43 (0.83–2.46)

0.280

1.10 (0.73–1.68)

0.403

3.00 (1.56–5.78)

<0.001

Unpaid

1.70 (0.98–2.95)

1.92 (0.76–4.83)

0.71 (0.33–1.55)

1.12 (0.47–2.63)

Age

25–34 y (reference)

1

1

1

1

35–44 y

1.71 (1.08–2.70)

<0.001

1.01 (0.54–1.88)

0.005

1.57 (0.97–2.53)

<0.001

1.24 (0.60–2.57)

<0.001

45–54 y

1.17 (0.75–1.82)

2.14 (1.30–3.50)

2.93 (1.76–4.86)

3.36 (1.83–6.18)

55–64 y

0.34 (0.15–0.78)

1.72 (0.90–3.26)

4.58 (2.41–8.71)

3.25 (1.57–6.73)

Female

Education (highest level completed)

Primary (<9 y) (reference)

1

1

1

1

Secondary (9–12 y)

0.69 (0.45–1.06)

0.042

0.68 (0.42–1.11)

0.258

1.41 (0.84–2.36)

0.365

0.96 (0.68–1.36)

0.428

Post–secondary (≥13 y)

0.17 (0.04–0.76)

0.65 (0.22–1.94)

1.12 (0.37–3.35)

0.68 (0.36–1.29)

Income (estimated annual household)

Low (<$5,000) reference

1

1

1

1

Middle ($5,000–$10,000)

0.75 (0.39–1.44)

0.78

1.01 (0.49–2.08)

0.652

1.17 (0.59–2.29)

<0.001

0.92 (0.60–1.40)

0.979

High (>$10,000)

0.45 (0.22–0.96)

0.88 (0.39–1.97)

2.36 (1.23–4.52)

0.99 (0.58–1.69)

Employment status c

Unemployed (reference)

1

1

1

1

Paid

1.72 (1.08–2.73)

0.006

1.12 (0.52–2.42)

0.809

0.78 (0.51–1.20)

0.503

1.27 (0.87–1.86)

0.251

Unpaid

0.91 (0.54–1.53)

1.26 (0.61–2.64)

0.95 (0.56–1.60)

1.34 (0.91–1.98)

Age

25–34 y (reference)

1

1

1

1

35–44 y

1.19 (0.84–1.69)

0.427

0.93 (0.49–1.76)

0.650

3.24 (1.53–6.85)

<0.001

0.62 (0.39–0.99)

<0.001

45–54 y

1.31 (0.80–2.16)

1.08 (0.58–2.01)

7.03 (3.73–13.28)

0.37 (0.22–0.63)

55–64 y

0.87 (0.47–1.59)

0.64 (0.30–1.35)

12.98 (5.29–31.86)

0.44 (0.22–0.88)

Abbreviations: FSM Federated States of Micronesia, BP Blood pressure, OR Odds ratio, CI confidence interval, y year, NA not applicable.

aUsing the 2002 STEPS Pohnpei, FSM data set; all estimates are sex-age standardized to the FSM 2000 Pohnpei Census; P values based on the Rao-Scott adjustment to the χ2.

bDaily tobacco use includes daily use of cigarettes, cigars, pipes, or smokeless tobacco.

cUnpaid category includes student, homemaker, volunteer, or retired.

dPhysically inactive includes <30 minutes/day of moderate activity on five or more days/week.

eHigh BP defined as BP ≥ 140/90 mmHG, or self-reports of BP medication use or hypertension diagnosis.

fCentral obesity defined as waist circumference: Male > 102 cm; Female > 88 cm).

We examined age-stratified results (Table 5). Compared with other age groups, participants aged <35 years reported more varied patterns between socioeconomic position and CVD risk factors. For example, those in this group with a postsecondary educational level were less likely to report daily tobacco use (OR: 0.29, CI: 0.12–0.76, p = 0.024) than those with a primary educational level; those reporting high income (>$10,000) had over four times the odds of high BP (OR: 4.68, CI: 2.18–10.06, p < 0.001) than those with low income (<$5000). Compared with women in the same age ranges, men aged 25–34 years had nearly three times the odds (OR: 2.82, CI: 1.47–5.40, p < 0.001) and those aged 35–44 years had >4.5 times the odds (OR: 4.74, CI: 3.13–7.17, p < 0.001) of reporting daily tobacco use.
Table 5

Age-stratified logistic regression models on association between socioeconomic demographic characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors, Pohnpei, FSM, 2002 a

Age group

Predictor (measure)

Daily tobacco useb

Physically inactivec

High BPd

OR (95% CI)

p

OR (95% CI)

p

OR (95% CI)

p

25–34 y

Education (highest level completed)

Primary (<9 y) (reference)

1

1

1

Secondary (9–12 y)

0.56 (0.30–1.01)

0.024

0.68 (0.42–1.01)

0.001

0.37 (0.16–0.87)

0.51

Post-secondary (≥13 y)

0.29 (0.12–0.76)

0.29 (0.15–0.57)

0.62 (0.30–1.30)

Income (estimated annual household)

Low (<$5,000) (reference)

1

1

1

Middle ($5,000–$10,000)

0.66 (0.26–165)

0.272

1.09 (0.40–2.97)

0.629

1.61 (0.60–4.29

<0.001

High (>$10,000)

0.43 (0.13–1.48)

2.32 (0.45–11.99)

4.68 (2.18–10.06)

Employment status e

Unemployed (reference)

1

1

1

Paid

1.79 (0.91–3.24)

0.046

2.10 (0.98–4.48)

0.131

0.98 (0.51–1.90)

0.804

Unpaid

0.81 (0.43–1.55)

1.28 (0.54–3.05)

1.43 (0.42–4.82)

Sex

Female (reference)

1

1

1

Male

2.82 (1.47–5.40)

0.001

0.23 (0.12–0.42)

<0.001

3.77 (1.83–7.79)

<0.001

35–44 y

Education (highest level completed)

Primary (<9 y) (reference)

1

1

1

Secondary (9–12 y)

0.86 (0.56–1.32)

0.161

1.00 (0.53–1.89)

0.606

0.98 (0.54–1.79)

0.854

Post-secondary (≥13 y)

0.51 (0.24–1.05)

0.66 (0.28–1.55)

0.76 (0.28–2.07)

Income (estimated annual household)

Low (<$5,000) (reference)

1

1

1

Middle ($5,000–$10,000)

1.00 (0.46–2.15)

0.563

1.24 (0.65–2.36)

0.887

0.71 (0.30–1.70)

0.188

High (>$10,000)

0.54 (0.16–1.56)

1.47 (0.34–6.39)

2.07 (0.81–5.28)

Employment status e

Unemployed (reference)

1

1

1

Paid

0.82 (0.45–1.51)

0.776

1.04 (0.48–2.24)

0.114

1.19 (0.75–1.90)

0.478

Unpaid

0.87 (0.44–1.70)

2.19 (0.85–5.66)

0.74 (0.33–1.66)

Sex

Female (reference)

1

1

1

Male

4.74 (3.13–7.17)

<0.001

0.17 (0.17–0.65)

0.001

1.62 (0.91–2.91))

0.089

45–54 y

Education (highest level completed)

Primary (<9 y) (reference)

1

1

1

Secondary (9–12 y)

0.76 (0.43–1.33)

0.592

1.51 (0.68–1.23)

0.445

1.01 (0.61–1.67)

0.769

Post-secondary (≥13 y)

0.91 (0.38–2.19)

1.65 (0.39–6.95)

1.23 (0.65–2.30)

Income (estimated annual household)

Low (<$5,000) (reference)

1

1

1

Middle ($5,000–$10,000)

0.83 (0.34–2.02)

0.115

1.17 (0.42–3.23)

0.518

0.88 (0.51–1.50)

0.604

High (>$10,000)

0.23 (0.07–0.80)

0.96 (0.23–3.88)

1.38 (0.77–2.46)

Employment status e

Unemployed (NA) (reference)

1

1

1

Paid (NA)

1.70 (0.93–3.11)

0.074

0.91 (0.44–1.90)

0.923

0.70 (0.39–1.27)

0.473

Unpaid (NA)

2.33 (1.02–5.33)

1.17 (0.41–3.33)

0.71 (0.33–1.51)

Sex

Female (reference)

1

1

1

Male

2.54 (1.48–4.35)

<0.001

0.47(0.21–1.04)

0.051

1.65 (1.01–2.65)

0.031

55–64 y

Education (highest level completed)

Primary (<9 y) (reference)

1

1

1

Secondary (9–12 y)

0.68 (0.18–2.68)

0.857

1.00 (0.20–4.93)

0.884

1.02 (0.43–2.42)

0.767

Post-secondary (≥13 y)

0.85 (0.18–4.14)

0.76 (0.19–3.02)

0.61 (0.14–2.61)

Income (estimated annual household)

Low (<$5,000) (reference)

1

1

1

Middle ($5,000–$10,000)

0.54 (0.12–2.33)

0.183

0.54 (0.20–1.48)

0.143

1.49 (0.76–2.91)

0.441

High (>$10,000)

1.98 (0.63–6.21)

1.00 (0.35–2.89)

1.89 (0.64–5.56)

Employment status e

Unemployed (reference)

1

1

1

Paid

1.53 (0.49–4.78)

0.723

0.50 (0.14–1.82)

0.088

0.73 (0.31–1.77)

0.626

Unpaid

1.15 (0.27–4.92)

1.27 (0.38–4.26)

0.72 (0.36–1.45)

Sex

Female (reference)

1

1

1

Male

0.98 (0.37–2.62)

0.968

1.00 (0.42–2.37)

0.994

1.70 (0.79–3.69)

0.159

Abbreviations: FSM Federated States of Micronesia, BP Blood pressure, OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval, y year, NA Not applicable.

aUsing the 2002 STEPS Pohnpei, FSM data set; all estimates are sex-age standardized to the FSM 2000 Pohnpei Census; P values based on the Rao-Scott adjustment to the χ2.

bDaily tobacco use includes daily use of cigarettes, cigars, pipes, or smokeless tobacco.

cPhysically inactive includes <30 minutes/day of moderate activity on five or more days/week.

dHigh BP defined as BP ≥ 140/90 mmHG, or self-reports of BP medication use or hypertension diagnosis.

eUnpaid category includes student, homemaker, volunteer, or retired.

Discussion

Our analysis revealed that socioeconomic position and demographic characteristics were associated with selected CVD risk factors with variations by risk factor, sex and age characteristics, and in the direction of the association (i.e., direct or inverse).

Related studies

Worldwide, as of 2006, smoking prevalence was higher for men (40%) than for women (nearly 9%), and men accounted for 80% of all smokers [30]. Our findings were consistent with a recent review of data from 48 LMICs participating in the World Health Survey, which revealed higher smoking rates among the less educated, decreasing proportions of smoking among persons in older age groups, and inverse associations between wealth and smoking within LMICs [31]. In contrast, our analysis found that, when controlling for other factors, women reporting paid employment and men reporting unpaid employment had twice the odds of daily tobacco use than those reporting unemployment.

Although other studies have assessed a variety of physical activity domains, in general our findings of higher likelihood of low physical activity for women, increasing age group, and those reporting primary education are consistent with other studies in LMICs. For example, an assessment of cross-national data from Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania revealed that lower educational level is a strong and consistent predictor of leisure time inactivity across gender [32]. In most countries, men are more active than women [33, 34], and increasing age is associated with lower physical activity prevalence, especially in men [34].

In our study’s general population a higher income and paid employment status were associated with higher odds of high BP and central obesity, respectively. We also observed differences across gender. For example, men had twice the odds of high BP than women and women with incomes > $10,000 had more than twice the odds of high BP than those reporting incomes < $5,000 though not for men. We also found that women had twice the odds of central obesity than men. For men, paid employment was associated with three times the odds of central obesity. Some other studies in LMICs have reported different results for these associations. For example, in rural Vietnamese adults, aged 25–64 years, hypertension was inversely associated with education level [35]. Another study among urban Latin American adults aged 18 years found inverse associations for income and education with hypertension [36]. Additionally, in a landmark review (1989) on the relationship between socioeconomic position and obesity, researchers reported a strong inverse association for women in developed countries, with a higher likelihood of obesity among women in lower socioeconomic groups [37]. In 2007, McLaren [38] updated this review, reporting a gradual reversal of this social gradient (for both men and women), with an increasing proportion of positive associations and a decreasing proportion of negative associations when shifting from high-income countries to medium- and low- income countries.

While evidence is limited, the varied patterning among socioeconomic position and CVD risk factors in our study may suggest a gradual shift in the epidemiologic transition within Pohnpei. For many high-income countries, thru the progression of socioeconomic development, researchers have documented an epidemiological transition; from a direct to an inverse association between socioeconomic position and CVD risk factors [15]. Rising rates of mean BP has been identified as an early indicator of this transition [6]. Comparisons with previous research, although limited, suggest a rise in mean BP among adults living in Pohnpei. For example, seminal cross-sectional studies in 1947 and 1953 observed low BP among adults in Pohnpei and, in 1983, researchers reported significantly increased diastolic BP among urban males [39]. While our findings suggest a continued increase in mean BP among adults living in Pohnpei, particularly for those reporting higher income.

Researchers suggest that the epidemiologic transition occurs because wealthier and more educated persons tend to be early adopters of high-risk behaviors that contribute to CVD [40, 41]. As health-related consequences are realized, those in higher socioeconomic position embrace lifestyle change and other prevention measures, subsequently lowering their CVD risk. In contrast, the uneducated poor may experience later peaks in higher risk lifestyle behaviors—such as less physical activity, high-fat diets, or increased psychosocial stress—that lead to increased CVD after declines are seen among the wealthier [40]. Unlike high-income countries, the challenge for LMIC countries is that this transition may occur more rapidly with the changes in risk factors and CVD prevalence outpacing the development of policy, environmental and system changes needed to effectively target CVD reduction [6].

Implications for CVD risk factor prevention

In 2011, a political declaration from the United Nations high-level meeting on chronic noncommunicable diseases recommended stronger country-level surveillance and monitoring of chronic diseases and associated risk factors, including socioeconomic determinants, to appropriately target public health policy and programmatic needs [42]. Although repeated surveys will provide trend data for CVD risk factors, our study results demonstrate how population health surveillance data can provide context-specific strategies to address CVD risk factors in that population, in this case that of Pohnpei. Over the last several years, the FSM Department of Health and Social Affairs has been building capacity to prevent and control chronic disease [43] and developing policy and environmental strategies to promote physical activity, consumption of local fruit and vegetables, and tobacco-free living, in partnership with governmental and community networks [4345]. Possible interventions to address CVD risk factors within Pohnpei include:

  •  Work-site wellness programs that provide access to and support for tobacco cessation and obesity prevention among adults.

  •  Increased policy and promotional efforts to create smoke-free environments, and media campaigns and other governmental actions to reduce the social acceptability of tobacco use.

  •  Environmental policies and programs aimed toward men in workplace settings and within cultural support networks, which encourage increased physical activity and healthy food choices to lower central obesity.

  •  Enhanced BP monitoring and treatment at worksites, in health systems, and through community linkages (e.g., faith-based and men’s and women’s groups), targeting adults aged ≥35 years.

  •  Collaborations with local communities to improve culturally and linguistically appropriate health literacy materials to raise awareness of CVD risk factors (i.e. tobacco use, low physical activity, high BP, and central obesity) and actions necessary to lower individual risk.

Further research needs

While the 2002 Pohnpei STEPS population health survey establishes baseline data, monitoring time trends can provide a consistent, up-to-date, and standardized database to support population health research, policy, and program development. While our analysis revealed several significant predictors for CVD risk factors, the strengths of the associations were small, suggesting that other determinants, not examined in our study, may play important roles in the health of the population. Further research to assess the behavioral, biologic, and environmental impact of socioeconomic position on CVD risk-factor clustering may also help increase understanding and inform population health efforts to reduce the burden of CVD disease [15, 4648] in the people of Pohnpei.

Strengths and limitations

The strengths of this study include engagement of the FSM Department of Health and Social Affairs leadership, a representative sample, and objective anthropometric measures. We also acknowledge the study limitations. Inherent methodological biases in our study model limit the generalizability of findings beyond Pohnpei and other subpopulations in FSM. For example, because the STEPS dataset did not provide probability variables for sample selection, we assigned standardized age-sex rates, which may not have been representative of the 2002 adult Pohnpeian population.

Additionally, we used a cross-sectional sample for this study, which does not allow examination of causal relationships. The study also includes use of self-reported behavioral risk-factor measures that are subject to participant recall, social desirability, and response bias. The limited data collection period, within the primary study, may have also introduced seasonal variation in responses. These potential biases could contribute to under- or over-reporting of risk [49].

Conclusion

In LMICs, the burden of CVD morbidity and mortality has been increasing at more compressed rates than those experienced by high-income countries in previous decades. Country-level population health surveillance is critical for understanding the epidemiology of CVD risk factors. Our results indicated that, in Pohnpei, socioeconomic position and demographic characteristics were associated with selected CVD risk factors with variations by risk factor, sex-age characteristics, and in the direction of the association. The 2002 Pohnpei dataset provided country-level baseline information; to determine trends, further population health surveillance and monitoring is needed. Having trend data might help decision makers tailor policy, program interventions, and fiscal resource needs for CVD prevention.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the contributions of the following individuals to this research study: Dr. Vita A. Skilling, Kipier Lippwe, and Moses Predrick, Federated States of Micronesia; Dr. Lawrence Barker, Tony Pearson-Clarke, Barbara Park, and Dr. Dawn Satterfield, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Dr. Philayrath Phongsavan, University of Sydney; and Melanie Cowan, Leanne Riley, and Dr. Li Dan, World Health Organization. This study was supported by funding from intermural grant (#TO6125) from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Defense, or U.S. Government; the federally operated Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences; or the Federated States of Micronesia.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease and Health Promotion
(2)
Department of Health and Social Affairs, Federated States of Micronesia
(3)
Uniformed Services University, Graduate School of Nursing

References

  1. World Health Organization: Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2010. 2011, Geneva: World Health Organization, http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd_report2010/en/,Google Scholar
  2. Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Noghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, Ezzati M, Shibuya K, Salomon JA, Abdalla S, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Ackerman I, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, Ali MK, Alvarado M, Anderson HR, Anderson LM, Andrews KG, Atkinson C, Baddour LM, Bahalim AN, Barker-Collo S, Barrero LH, Bartels DH, Basáñez MG, Baxter A, Bell ML, Benjamin EJ: Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012, 380 (9859): 2197-2223. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. World Health Organization: The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 Update. 2008, Geneva: World Health Organization, http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/2004_report_update/en/,Google Scholar
  4. Omran AR: The epidemiologic transition: a theory of the epidemiology of population change. Milbank Q. 2005, 83 (4): 731-757. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00398.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Reddy KS: Cardiovascular disease in non-Western countries. N Engl J Med. 2004, 350 (24): 2438-2440. 10.1056/NEJMp048024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaziano TA, Bitton A, Anand S, Abrahams-Gessel S, Murphy A: Growing epidemic of coronary heart disease in low- and middle-income countries. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2010, 35 (2): 75-115.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Leeder S, Raymond S, Greenberg H, Liu H, Esson K: A Race Against Time: The Challenge of Cardiovascular Disease in Developing Economies. 2004, New York, NY: Columbia University, http://www.earthinstitute.columbia.edu/news/2004/images/raceagainsttime_FINAL_051104.pdf,Google Scholar
  8. Levi F, Chatenoud L, Bertuccio P, Lucchini F, Negri E, La Vecchia C: Mortality from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in Europe and other areas of the world: an update. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009, 16 (3): 333-350. 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328325d67d.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. de Souza MDFM, Gawryszewski VP, Orduñez P, Sanhueza A, Espinal MA: Cardiovascular disease mortality in the Americas: current trends and disparities. Heart. 2012, 98 (16): 1207-1212. 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-301828.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, Amann M, Anderson HR, Andrews KG, Aryee M, Atkinson C, Bacchus LJ, Bahalim AN, Balakrishnan K, Balmes J, Barker-Collo S, Baxter A, Bell ML, Blore JD, Blyth F, Bonner C, Borges G, Bourne R, Boussinesq M, Brauer M, Brooks P, Bruce NG, Brunekreef B, Bryan-Hancock C, Bucello C, et al: A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012, 380 (9859): 2224-2260. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Bovet P, Paccaud F: Cardiovascular disease and the changing face of global public health: a focus on low and middle income countries. Public Health Rev. 2012, 33 (2): 397-415.Google Scholar
  12. Jha P, Chaloupka FJ, Moore J, Gajalakshmi V, Gupta PC, Peck R, Asma S, Zatonski W, et al: Tobacco Addiction. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. Edited by: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, Alleyne G, Claeson M, Evans DB. 2006, Washington (DC): World Bank, 2Google Scholar
  13. Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, Danaei G, Lin JK, Paciorek CJ, Singh GM, Gutierrez HR, Lu Y, Bahalim AN, Farzadfar F, Riley LM, Ezzati M, Global Burden of Metabolic Risk Factors of Chronic Diseases Collaborating Group (Body Mass Index): National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 million participants. Lancet. 2011, 377 (9765): 557-567. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62037-5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. GDP per capita (current US$). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD,
  15. Adler NE, Stewart J: The biology of disadvantage: socioeconomic status and health. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010, 1186: 1-275. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05385.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mendis S, Banerjee A: Cardiovascular Disease: Equity and Social Determinants. Equity, Social Determinants, and Public Health Programmes. Edited by: Blas E, Kurup A. 2010, Geneva: World Health Organization, 31-49.Google Scholar
  17. Mendis S, Puska P, Norrving B: Global Atlas on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Control. 2011, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  18. Braveman P, Tarimo E: Social inequalities in health within countries: not only an issue for affluent nations. Soc Sci Med. 2002, 54 (11): 1621-1635. 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00331-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. World Health Organization: Noncommunicable Disease and Poverty: The Need for pro-Poor Strategies in the Western Pacific Region: A Review. 2007, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  20. Miranda JJ, Kinra S, Casas JP, Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S: Non–communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: context, determinants and health policy. Trop Med Int Health. 2008, 13 (10): 1225-1234. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02116.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Federated States of Micronesia (Pohnpei): NCD Risk Factors STEPS Report. 2008, Palikir, Pohnpei: Federated States of Micronesia: Department of Health and Social AffairsGoogle Scholar
  22. Garmon Bibb SC: Issues associated with secondary analysis of population health data. Appl Nurs Res. 2007, 20 (2): 94-99. 10.1016/j.apnr.2006.02.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Doolan DM, Froelicher ES: Using an existing data set to answer new research questions: a methodological review. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2009, 23 (3): 203-215. 10.1891/1541-6577.23.3.203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kneipp SM, Yarandi HN: Complex sampling designs and statistical issues in secondary analysis. Wes J Nurs Res. 2002, 24 (5): 552-566. 10.1177/019394502400446414.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Whiteworth JA: 2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J Hypertens. 2003, 21 (11): 1983-1992.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. World Health Organization: Waist Circumference and Waist-hip Ratio. Report of a WHO Expert Consultation. 2011, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim S, Egerter S, Cubbin C, Takahashi ER, Paula BP: Potential implications of missing income data in population-based surveys: an example from a postpartum survey in California. Public Health Rep. 2007, 122 (6): 753-763.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Phillips S: Defining and measuring gender: a social determinant of health whose time has come. Int J Equity Health. 2005, 4 (1): 11-10.1186/1475-9276-4-11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Hosey GM, Samo M, Gregg EW, Barker L, Padden D, Bibb SG: Association of socioeconomic position and demographic characteristics with cardiovascular disease risk factors and healthcare access among adults living in Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia [abstract]. 2013, Arlington, Virginia: American Diabetes Association, http://main.diabetes.org/dorg/disparities-partnership-fourm/2013-forum-compilation-of.pdf,Google Scholar
  30. Gender, Women, and the Tobacco Epidemic. Edited by: Samet JM, Yoon S-Y. 2010, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  31. Hosseinpoor AR, Parker LA, Tursan d’Espaignet E, Chatterji S: Social determinants of smoking in low- and middle-income countries: results from the World Health Survey. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (5): e20331-10.1371/journal.pone.0020331.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Pomerleau J, McKee M, Robertson A, Vaasc S, Kadziauskiene K, Abaravicius A, Bartkeviciute R, Pudule I, Grinberga D: Physical inactivity in the Baltic countries. Prev Med. 2000, 31 (6): 665-672. 10.1006/pmed.2000.0761.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U, Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group: Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012, 380 (9838): 247-257. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Bauman A, Bull F, Chey T, Craig CL, Ainsworth BE, Sallis JF, Bowles HR, Hagstromer M, Sjostrom M, Pratt M, IPS Group: The International Prevalence Study on Physical Activity: results from 20 countries. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009, 6: 21-10.1186/1479-5868-6-21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Minh HV, Byass P, Dao LH, Nguyen T, Wall S: Risk factors for chronic disease among rural Vietnamese adults and the association of these factors with sociodemographic variables: findings from the WHO STEPS survey in rural Vietnam, 2005. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007, 4 (2): A22-PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Fleischer NL, Diez Roux AV, Alazraqui M, Spinelli H: Social patterning of chronic disease risk factors in a Latin American city. J Urban Health. 2008, 85 (6): 923-937. 10.1007/s11524-008-9319-2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Sobal J, Stunkard AJ: Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychol Bull. 1989, 105: 260-275.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. McLaren L: Socioeconomic status and obesity. Epidemiol Rev. 2007, 29: 29-48. 10.1093/epirev/mxm001. PubMed PMID: 17478442. Epub 2007/05/05View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Patrick RC, Prior IAM, Smith JC, Smith AH: Relationship between blood pressure and modernity among Ponapeans. Int J Epi. 1983, 12: 36-44. 10.1093/ije/12.1.36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Pearson TA: Education and income: double-edged swords in the epidemiologic transition of cardiovascular disease. Ethn Dis. 2003, 13 (S1): 58-63.Google Scholar
  41. McKeown R: The epidemiologic transition: changing patterns of mortality and population dynamics. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2009, 3 (S1): 19S-26S.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. United Nations: Political Declaration of the High-Level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases. 2011, http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/66/L.1,Google Scholar
  43. World Health Organization, Western Pacific Region: Noncommunicable Diseases in the Western Pacific Region. 2012, Geneva: World Health Organization, http://www.wpro.who.int/noncommunicable_diseases/documents/ncd_in_the_wpr.pdf,Google Scholar
  44. Englberger L, Lorens A, Pretrick M, Tara MJ, Johnson E: Local food policies can help promote local foods and improve health: a case study from the Federated States of Micronesia. Hawaii J Med Pub Health. 2011, 70 (11 suppl 2): 31-34.Google Scholar
  45. Hosey G, Aitaoto N, Satterfield D, Kelly J, Apaisam CJ, Belyeu-Camacho T, de Brum I, Luces PS, Rengiil A, Turituri P: The culture, community, and science of type 2 diabetes prevention in the US Associated Pacific Islands. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009, 6 (3): http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2009/jul/08_0129.htm,Google Scholar
  46. Ahmed SM, Hadi A, Razzaque A, Ashraf A, Juvekar S, Ng N, Kanungsukkasem U, Soonthornthada K, Van Minh H, Huu Bich T: Clustering of chronic non-communicable disease risk factors among selected Asian populations: levels and determinants. Glob Health Action. 2009, 2: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2785214/,Google Scholar
  47. Nguyen QN, Pham ST, Do LD, Nguyen VL, Wall S, Weinehall L, Bonita R, Byass P: Cardiovascular disease risk factor patterns and their implications for intervention strategies in Vietnam. Int J Hyperten. 2012, 2012: 560397-http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijht/2012/560397/,View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, McQueen M, Budaj A, Pais P, Varigos J, Lisheng L, INTERHEART Study Investigators: Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004, 364 (9438): 937-952. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Smyth JM, Webb MS, Oikaya M: Self-Report of Cancer-Related Behaviors. 2007, Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University, http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/brp/constructs/self-report/self-report.pdf,Google Scholar
  50. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/895/prepub

Copyright

© Hosey et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement