Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A survey of retirement intentions of baby boomers: an overview of health, social and economic determinants

  • Anne W Taylor1Email author,
  • Rhiannon Pilkington1,
  • Helen Feist2,
  • Eleonora Dal Grande1 and
  • Graeme Hugo2
BMC Public Health201414:355

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-355

Received: 6 December 2013

Accepted: 4 April 2014

Published: 14 April 2014

Abstract

Background

Governments have been implementing policies aimed at halting the trend towards early retirement for Baby Boomers. Public policies can have a strong effect on when a person retires and this analysis contributes to an improved understanding of retirement aspirations in regards to health, social, workplace and economic determinants.

Methods

In October 2011 a telephone survey was undertaken with participants aged 50 to 65 years who were in paid employment and who had been in the workforce for the previous three years. Participants were obtained from two identical South Australian cohort studies - the North West Adelaide Health Study and the Florey Adelaide Male Ageing Study. The results of the telephone survey were linked to the original cohort data. Data were weighted by sex, age, postcode and probability of selection in the household. Work related questions included how much they thought about their retirement, current occupation, employment status, type of workplace and hours worked per week. Health related questions included current smoking status, physical activity, body mass index, self-reported health status and overall life satisfaction. Uni-variable and multi-variable analyses were undertaken to compare the different associations between people who were and were not intending to retire.

Results

In total, 25.9% (n = 210) of people who were currently in paid employment indicated that they intend to retire completely from the workforce. The remainder indicated that they will continue to work (41.8% retire from full-time work but work part-time, 25.7% continue working part-time but reduce their current hours, and 6.7% never retire). The multi-variable results indicate that those with lower education, having a savings habit, and sales workers more likely to anticipate complete retirement. The self-employed, and those thinking only moderately about retirement, were more likely to extend their working life beyond age 65.

Conclusion

An important finding of this study is the large number of Baby Boomers who indicated that they would be happy to work part-time or never retire. Policies and continued dialogue aimed at making the workplace a safe, flexible and welcoming environment to accommodate this wish, and to entice others to take up this option over complete withdrawal from the labour force, is required.

Keywords

Baby boomers Retirement Australia Survey

Background

The economic, social and health consequences of Baby Boomers reaching retirement age is a topic of increasing academic and policy interest [13]. Baby Boomers, those born between 1946 and 1965, constitute a large proportion of the population of most industrialised countries and has been exacerbated by increased longevity and decreasing birth rates affecting age distributions [47]. In Australia, there were 4.2 million babies born between 1946 and 1965 [7] and they now constitute a quarter of the total population [8]. Moreover the post-WWII era was a phase of massive immigration which introduced significant numbers of Baby Boomers born in Europe. In 2011, 33.2% of Australian Baby Boomers were born outside of Australia.

As Baby Boomers start retiring, countries facing this demographic transformation have major concerns. These include retirees outnumbering new entrants to the labour force, loss of skilled and experienced workers [5, 9] and the effect on economic growth and income from taxation [1012]. Coupled with this is the financial burden with increasing numbers requiring tax-funded services such as pensions and other social security benefits [7]. Importantly, the impact on the health system as increased numbers require medical services and intervention is of concern [9, 13].

As a result of these apprehensions, governments have been implementing policies aimed at halting the long term trend towards early retirement [7, 1416], contrasting with government policies of the 1970s and 1980s during which early retirement was promoted as a way to lessen the burden of the over-supply of workers [5]. Government initiatives aimed at encouraging Baby Boomers to remain in the workforce, to lessen the effects of an ageing population, include implementing age discrimination laws, removing compulsory retirement age, raising the pension eligibility age and encouraging increased personal saving and planning for retirement [7, 17, 18]. In addition, policies aimed at extending working life and workplace participation by encouraging a delay or gradual transitions to retirement, and financial incentives for companies who hire older employees have been implemented [9, 10]. Notwithstanding these policies, research has shown that early retirement is both voluntary and forced and is influenced by ill-health, lack of job satisfaction and adequate long-term financial resources [9, 10, 14, 1922].

This study examines a sample of Australian 50–65 year olds and assesses their retirement intentions. As argued by Anderson [6], public policies can have a strong effect on when a person retires and this study aims to contribute to an improved understanding of retirement aspirations in regards to health, social, workplace and economic determinants. Delaying retirement is dependent upon Baby Boomers being willing and able to extend their working life [19] and this research provides an empirical context to these factors to better inform policy making.

Methods

Survey design and sample selection

Australia’s Baby Boomer Generation, Obesity and Work – Patterns, Causes and Implications is an Australian Research Council (ARC) funded project. As a part of this project, in October 2011 a telephone survey was undertaken with participants from the North West Adelaide Health Study (NWAHS) and the Florey Adelaide Male Ageing Study (FAMAS).

NWAHS commenced in 1999 and is a representative longitudinal cohort study of 4060 randomly selected adults aged 18 years and over at the time of recruitment from the north-west region of Adelaide, the capital of South Australia. Sampling was via the electronic white pages. Major stages of the study have been held approximately every four years and incorporated telephone interviews, self-completed questionnaires and biomedical clinic examinations. A detailed description of the methodology and cohort is available elsewhere [2325].

FAMAS commenced in 2002 as a longitudinal study assessing the biomedical, socio-demographic, behavioural, physical and psychological interactions that contribute to the health and health-related behaviours of men. The geographical regions, clinic procedures, sampling, recruitment and methodology was identical to NWAHS except it was limited to men aged 35 to 80 years (n = 1195). All major stages of the study have included a self-completed questionnaire and a clinic examination. A detailed description of the methodology and cohort is available elsewhere [26].

A letter and an information sheet introducing the study were sent to each selected participant from the two cohorts. The letter informed participants of the purpose of the study and indicated they could expect to receive a telephone call within the time frame specified. Data were collected by a contracted agency and interviews were undertaken seven days a week. Telephone calls were made between 10.00 am and 8.30 pm. The CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interview) system was used to conduct the interviews. Data were collected during October and November 2011. At least 10 and up to 15 call backs were made to each respondent. Different times of the day or evening were scheduled for each call back. If a person could not be interviewed immediately they were rescheduled for interview at a time suitable to them.

A total of n = 1642 interviews were completed, resulting in an overall response rate of 87.5% and a participation rate of 93.0%. For the purpose of this study, analysis was limited to Baby Boomers aged 50 to 65 years who were in the paid employment either full-time, part-time, casual or self-employed and who had been in the workforce for the previous three years (n = 897). The results of the CATI survey were linked to the original cohort data. Data were weighted by sex, age, postcode and probability of selection in the household to the ABS Estimated Residential Population for the NW Adelaide regions for 50–65 year olds.

Main variables

All respondents who were currently working were asked if they planned to completely retire, retire from full-time work but work part-time, continue to work part-time but reduce hours, or never retire. Respondents were also asked how much they thought about their retirement (a lot, moderately, not at all). Other questions asked in the CATI included highest level of education, marital status, annual household income, financial status (very comfortable, reasonably comfortable, just getting along), household structure (family with child/children, step/blended/sole parent, adult living alone, adults living with partner, adults living together – recoded into living with or without children), and saving habits (which of the following statements comes closest to describing your savings habits? - Don’t save/usually spend more than income; Don’t save/usually spend about as much as income; Save whatever is left over at the end of the month/no regular plan; Spend regular income/save other income; Save regularly by putting money aside each month) with the variable dichotomised into do not save (categories one and two) and save (categories three to five).

Work related questions included current occupation, employment status (full time, part time, casual, self-employed), type of workplace (government, not for profit, private), actual hours worked per week (< 40, 40+), size of workplace, how they felt about their job (satisfied, dissatisfied), job security (poor – agree/disagree), whether it was possible to work from home, whether work interfered with responsibilities and activities outside of work, how satisfied they were with the balance between work and life, and whether their job required a lot of physical exertion.

Health related questions included current smoking status, physical activity (derived on the amount of walking and moderate and vigorous activity in a one week period) [27], body mass index (BMI) which was derived from self-reported weight and height and recoded into three categories (underweight/normal weight, overweight and obese) [28], inadequate daily consumption of vegetables (< 5 serves) and fruit (< 2 serves) [29], number of hours slept per night, self-reported health status (SF1 – excellent/very good, good, fair/poor) and overall life satisfaction. Psychological distress was determined using the Kessler 10 [30, 31].

Statistical analyses

The conventional 5% level was used to determine statistical significance and 95% confidence intervals were provided for estimates. All frequencies and analyses were conducted using weighted data. Uni-variable analyses using chi-square (χ 2) tests were undertaken to compare the different associations between people who were and were not intending to retire, on a range of socio-demographic, socio-economic, health and work-related other variables. Multi-variable analyses using logistic regression modelling was subsequently developed in order to produce a model of the relationship of the independent variables. All independent variables with p values less than 0.25 level in each of the uni-variable analyses were entered into the logistic regression model [32]. Non-significant variables (p > 0.05) based on the log likelihood ratio tests were removed until a final model was obtained.

Results

Of the eligible respondents (n = 897), 9.4% (n = 84) were excluded from the analyses because they did not know their retirement intention. In total, 25.9% (n = 210) of people aged 50 years and over who were currently working indicated that they intend to retire completely from the workforce with 74.1% (n = 602) indicating that they will continue to work in some capacity (41.8% retire from full-time work but work part-time, 25.7% continue working part-time but reduce their current hours, and 6.7% never retire from workforce).

Table 1 shows the socio-demographic characteristics of the sample (n = 812). Mean age was 56.9 years (standard deviation = 4.48). In total, 80% of the sample were married or living with a partner and over 40% had an annual household income of over $A80,000.
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of sample

 

n

% (95% CI)

Sex

  

Male

407

50.1 (46.6 - 53.5)

Female

406

49.9 (46.5 - 53.4)

Age

  

50 to 54

305

37.5 (34.3 - 40.9)

55 to 59

266

32.8 (29.6 - 36.1)

60 to 64

241

29.7 (26.7 - 33.0)

Education

  

Bachelor degree or higher

154

19.0 (16.5 - 21.9)

Certificate/Diploma

185

22.8 (20.1 - 25.8)

Trade/apprenticeship

130

16.1 (13.7 - 18.8)

No schooling to secondary

274

33.7 (30.5 - 37.0)

Not stated/refused

68

8.4 (6.7 - 10.5)

Marital Status

  

Married/Living with partner

650

80.0 (77.2 - 82.7)

Separated/Divorced

100

12.3 (10.2 - 14.8)

Widowed

27

3.3 (2.3 - 4.8)

Never Married

35

4.3 (3.1 - 6.0)

Household income per year

  

$80,001+

335

41.2 (37.9 - 44.6)

$40,001-$80,000

275

33.9 (30.7 - 37.2)

$0 - $40,000

133

16.4 (14.0 - 19.1)

Not stated/refused/don't know

69

8.5 (6.8 - 10.6)

Table 2 highlights the uni-variable analysis of demographic factors associated with those who intend to completely retire (as opposed to those who plan to continue to work full or part-time) with females, those with lower levels of education, and those indicating a habit of saving (no regular plan to regularly) being more likely to indicate they would retire completely.
Table 2

UNIVARIABLE ANALYSIS of demographic variables associated with the intention to completely retire from the workforce for Baby Boomers aged 50+

 

n/N

  %

OR (95% OR)

p value

Sex

    

Male

87/407

21.4

1.00

 

Female

123/406

30.4

1.61 (1.17 - 2.21)

0.003

Education

    

Bachelor degree or higher

23/154

14.9

1.00

 

Certificate/Diploma

40/185

21.4

1.56 (0.88 - 2.74)

0.125

Trade/apprenticeship

35/130

26.7

2.08 (1.16 - 3.75)

0.015

No schooling to secondary

95/274

34.8

3.05 (1.83 - 5.07)

<0.001

Marital Status

    

Married or living with partner

166/650

25.6

1.00

 

Other

44/162

27.1

1.08 (0.73 - 1.60)

0.692

Household income per year

    

$80,001+

87/335

26.1

1.00

 

$40,001-$80,000

73/275

26.6

1.02 (0.71 - 1.47)

0.903

$0 - $40,000

36/133

26.9

1.04 (0.66 - 1.64)

0.861

Not stated/refused/don't know

14/69

20.1

0.71 (0.38 - 1.35)

0.296

Given your current financial needs would you say you are…

    

Very comfortable

34/147

23.1

1.00

 

Reasonably comfortable

122/473

25.9

1.16 (0.75 - 1.79)

0.502

Just getting along

53/191

27.6

1.27 (0.77 - 2.08)

0.351

Household structure

    

Parents biological/step/blended/sole with children

57/244

23.2

1.00

 

Adults with no children

154/568

27.0

1.22 (0.86 - 1.74)

0.259

Description of saving habits

    

Don't save

21/121

17.7

1.00

 

Save but no regular plan to Save regularly

189/691

27.3

1.75 (1.07 - 2.87)

0.027

Overall

210/812

25.9

  
Table 3 highlights the work related variables with self-employed and those thinking only moderately about retirement being less likely and sale workers, machinery operators and drivers, and labourers more likely to anticipate complete retirement. In addition, those working over 40 hours per week, and those without the possibility of working from home were also more likely to indicate complete retirement.
Table 3

UNIVARIABLE ANALYSIS of socio-economic and work related variables associated with the intention to completely retire from the workforce for Baby Boomers aged 50+

.

n/N

  %

 OR

p value

Current employment status^

    

Full-time employee

111/407

27.3

1.00

 

Part-time employee

64/208

30.9

1.19 (0.82 - 1.71)

0.359

Casual or temporary

18/56

31.2

1.21 (0.66 - 2.21)

0.541

Self-employed

17/141

12.2

0.37 (0.21 - 0.64)

<0.001

Occupation

    

Managers/Professionals

60/280

21.3

1.00

 

Technicians/Trades Workers

18/99

18.4

0.83 (0.46 - 1.49)

0.538

Community and Personal Service Workers/Clerical and Administrative Workers

64/254

25.1

1.24 (0.83 - 1.86)

0.293

Sales Workers

28/63

44.3

2.94 (1.66 - 5.21)

<0.001

Machinery Operators and Drivers/Labourers

40/110

36.3

2.11 (1.30 - 3.42)

0.002

Type of workplace

    

Government agency

63/224

27.9

1.00

 

A not-for-profit, religious, or community organisation

17/53

31.3

1.18 (0.62 - 2.26)

0.619

A private sector business

130/531

24.4

0.84 (0.59 - 1.19)

0.319

Size of workplace

    

Small

42/173

24.0

1.00

 

Medium

40/151

26.5

1.14 (0.69 - 1.88)

0.613

Large

122/403

30.4

1.38 (0.92 - 2.07)

0.123

Number of hours work per week

    

40 or less hours

163/558

29.2

1.00

 

More than 40 hours

48/254

18.7

0.56 (0.39 - 0.80)

0.002

How much thought about own retirement

    

A lot

124/363

34.1

1.00

 

Moderately

59/354

16.7

0.39 (0.27 - 0.55)

<0.001

Not at all

28/95

29.1

0.80 (0.49 - 1.30)

0.364

How much job requires a lot of physical exertion or energy

    

All to some of the time

135/508

26.5

1.00

 

Almost none to none of the time

75/304

24.8

0.91 (0.66 - 1.27)

0.587

General feeling about job as a whole

    

Dissatisfied, not sure

25/108

23.0

1.00

 

Satisfied

185/705

26.3

1.19 (0.74 - 1.93)

0.466

“Job security is/was poor”

    

Agree, not sure

39/151

25.6

1.00

 

Disagree

172/661

26.0

1.02 (0.68 - 1.53)

0.925

Have the possibility to work from home

    

Yes

34/196

17.3

1.00

 

No

176/617

28.6

1.92 (1.28 - 2.90)

0.002

Work interferes with [personal] responsibilities & activities

    

Almost always, often, sometimes, rarely

139/575

24.1

1.00

 

Never

72/238

30.1

1.36 (0.97 - 1.90)

0.077

Satisfaction with balance between work and life

    

Satisfied, neither, not sure

178/689

25.9

1.00

 

Dissatisfied

32/123

25.9

1.00 (0.65 - 1.55)

0.986

Overall

210/812

25.9

  
Table 4 highlights the health-related variables with the overweight less likely to anticipate working beyond the retirement age of 65.
Table 4

UNIVARIABLE ANALYSIS of health related variables associated with the intention to completely retire from the workforce for Baby Boomers aged 50+

 

n/N

  %

 OR

p value

Self-reported health (SF1)

    

Excellent, Very good

74/326

22.6

1.00

 

Good

92/326

28.1

1.34 (0.94 - 1.91)

0.108

Fair, Poor

45/159

28.4

1.36 (0.88 - 2.09)

0.164

General satisfaction with life

    

Dissatisfied, not sure

29/127

23.1

1.00

 

Satisfied

181/685

26.4

1.19 (0.76 - 1.86)

0.442

Physical activity

    

No activity

40/149

26.6

1.00

 

Activity but not sufficient

96/329

29.1

1.13 (0.73 - 1.75)

0.575

Sufficient activity

65/298

21.8

0.77 (0.49 - 1.21)

0.255

Smoking status

    

Current smoker

32/121

26.5

1.00

 

Not a current smoker

163/638

25.5

0.95 (0.61 - 1.48)

0.825

Daily fruit consumption

    

0 to 1 serves per day

102/421

24.2

1.00

 

2+ serves per day (recommendation)

92/326

28.4

1.24 (0.89 - 1.72)

0.203

Daily vegetable consumption

    

0 to 4 serves per day

186/705

26.4

1.00

 

5+ serves per day (recommendation)

8/42

19.2

0.66 (0.30 - 1.45)

0.303

Psychological Distress

    

No psychological distress

190/742

25.6

1.00

 

Psychological distress

21/70

29.3

1.21 (0.70 - 2.07)

0.496

BMI

    

Underweight, Normal

53/168

31.6

1.00

 

Overweight

71/324

21.9

0.61 (0.40 - 0.92)

0.020

Obese

62/249

24.9

0.72 (0.47 - 1.11)

0.135

Total

210/812

25.9

  
Table 5 details the multi-variable results with lower education, saving regularly, and sales workers more likely to anticipate complete retirement and the self-employed and those thinking only moderately about retirement being more likely to extend their working life beyond age 65.
Table 5

MULTIVARIABLE ANALYSIS of variables associated with the intention to completely retire from the workforce for Baby Boomers aged 50+

 

OR (95% OR)

p value

Education

  

Bachelor degree or higher

1.00

 

Certificate/Diploma

1.64 (0.89 - 3.02)

0.111

Trade/apprenticeship

2.35 (1.20 - 4.60)

0.013

No schooling to secondary

3.08 (1.69 - 5.62)

<0.001

Description of saving habits

  

Don't save

1.00

 

Save but no regular plan to Save regularly

1.89 (1.11 - 3.21)

0.019

Current employment status^

  

Full-time employee

1.00

 

Part-time employee

0.94 (0.62 - 1.41)

0.752

Casual or temporary

1.11 (0.58 - 2.11)

0.753

Self-employed

0.30 (0.17 - 0.54)

<0.001

Occupation

  

Managers/Professionals

1.00

 

Technicians/Trades Workers

0.77 (0.40 - 1.49)

0.438

Community and Personal Service Workers/Clerical and Administrative Workers

0.82 (0.51 - 1.32)

0.414

Sales Workers

2.26 (1.16 - 4.38)

0.016

Machinery Operators and Drivers/Labourers

1.51 (0.86 - 2.65)

0.147

How much thought about own retirement

  

A lot

1.00

 

Moderately

0.37 (0.25 - 0.53)

<0.001

Not at all

0.89 (0.53 - 1.50)

0.657

Discussion

This research has identified health, social and economic determinants of Baby Boomers currently working who intend to retire completely, compared to those who are considering continuation of work either in a full-time or part-time capacity. In total, only a quarter of Baby Boomers in this sample planned to retire completely and this analysis has provided a detailed description of this group. As argued by others, the loosening of the retirement definition, as one that is seen as a definitive point in time without ‘shades of grey’, is changing with life course boundaries being loosened [33]. Part-time work, retirement transition and mindsets associated with what constitutes retirement are altering from the traditional, formalised, ‘on-time complete retirement’ concept [20].

Previous research has reported that health has a significant effect on working status in older ages [21, 34]. Our measure of overall health was a single self-reported question (SF1), which has been shown to be a powerful predictor of actual health status [13, 35]. This measure was not significant at the uni-variable or multivariable stage, indicating no difference in health status between those intending to retire completely at age 65 (the Australian government current recommended retirement age) and those planning to continue to work. It should be noted that our analysis was limited to those currently in the work force and respondents who were unemployed or stated home duties as their current work force status were excluded and may indeed have poorer health status. An Australian study has also shown that reducing risk factors increases labour force participation [36] but our study has shown that there is little relationship in our study between risk factors, as measured by physical activity, smoking status, fruit and vegetable consumption and BMI, and Baby Boomers plans to retire, especially at the multi-variable level.

Only one of three financial and economic related variables included in our analysis (household income, financial security and ability to save) were included in the multi-variable model with those indicating that they had a saving habit nearly twice as likely to indicate a preference to retire completely. It should be noted that no measure of wealth per se was assessed and this could be a confounding variable. Previous research has shown one of the major contemporary reasons for extending working life is lack of financial security [3, 22]. The Global Financial Crisis (GFC) originating in 2008, has affected all developed and developing countries [37] and in particular many of the current wave of Baby Boomers [18, 37, 38]. Previous Australian qualitative research conducted in 2008 reported that the majority of workers aged 50 to 62 years were re-assessing their retirement plans as a result of the GFC [38]. Research undertaken in 2009 reported that nearly 40% of workers aged 50 to 64 years had postponed their retirement plans [18] and other commentators have also suggested that Baby Boomers are increasingly staying in their jobs and that the impact of the GFC might be part of their decision making process [39]. Our results perhaps indicate that this hesitation in retiring completely has continued and the popular stereotype that Baby Boomers are not savers and are not saving for their retirement needs to be challenged [40].

Education level has previously been shown to not be related to intention to retire [20] although our multi-variable analysis shows that the more highly educated are more likely to continue to work part time or to never retire. As argued by others [20] education is also perhaps confounded by income, wealth, job security and job flexibility. Education attainment is also reflected in occupation. Other studies have reported similar results with the higher educated more likely to continue to work [15].

Another major finding of the study was the association between occupation and retirement intentions, with sales workers more likely to indicate full retirement as their choice. Research has shown that those in physically demanding jobs are more likely to retire early and completely [16, 41, 42]. In recent decades structural economic change has seen physically demanding jobs decrease although at the same time there has been an increase in high-stress jobs and cognitive challenging jobs which can also influence retirement plans [16]. Middle aged females are critical to the labour supply and are seen as a key policy target. Many of these are in the sales industry. Recent labour force trends show that more women aged 55 years and over are remaining in the work force than previously [39] and the most marked change was in the older 60 to 64 year age group. A large part of these increases are of part-time workers although those in full-time jobs have also increased. While not assessed in this analysis, the ‘dual issues’ of the formal carer shortage, and the current caring role of many Baby Boomers (limiting their participation in the work force), makes balancing the ‘caring’ role with work, a key policy issue. The caring responsibilities of mid-life women may impact on employment roles and pathways to increase workforce participation opportunities for this group warrants serious consideration [14, 15].

The self-employed were less likely to report retirement as an option. The retirement intentions of the self-employed have not been extensively researched [42, 43] although research has highlighted the average age is higher for self-employed retire than those employed by others [42]. It has been suggested that one self-reported group, who typically have been self-employed for a longer period of time, appreciate the flexibility, security and autonomy associated with being self-employed. A higher income around the retirement age also decreases the likelihood of permanently retiring. For a second group, the lack of financial security is a possible reason for the lack of retirement plans. It is apparent that self-employment for this second group is not a transitional process on the path to full retirement with research showing that these self-employed older workers are more likely to have had many short term and part-time positions and poor job prospects [42, 43].

The major weakness of this study is the self-reported nature of the data collection, common in all survey research methodology. Additional clarification on timeframe for retirement intension and the extent of how they were thinking about retirement would have been beneficial. Strengths include the relatively large sample size and the large number of variables assessed.

Conclusion

This research has highlighted a range of attributes associated with Baby Boomers planning to retire completely and reinforces the need for policies to encourage extension of working lives need to take account of a range of factors. There are no single ‘silver bullet’ solutions [44]. While acknowledging that some issues, such as work conditions, can be influenced by appropriate policy interventions, other factors, such as education, are not amenable to policy. However, increased flexibility with working hours may overcome some of these harder to influence factors [44]. The flexibility of working arrangements is an important policy [45] so that work-life balance is not compromised. The culture of early retirement, previously so pervasive, is being replaced by a culture of gradual retirement, encompassing continued part-time employment [1]. An important finding of this study is the large number of Baby Boomers who will be happy to work part-time or never retire. Policies and continued dialogue aimed at making the workplace a safe, flexible and welcoming environment to accommodate this wish, for this age group, is required.

Abbreviations

ARC: 

Australian research council

BMI: 

Body mass index

CATI: 

Computer assisted telephone interviewing

FAMAS: 

Florey adelaide males ageing study

GFC: 

Global financial crisis

NWAHS: 

North west adelaide health study.

Declarations

Acknowledgment

Australian Research Council (ARC).

NWAHS and FAMAS participants.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Population Research & Outcome Studies, Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide
(2)
Australian Population and Migration Research Centre, The University of Adelaide

References

  1. Gendron B: Older workers and active ageing in France: the changing early retirement and company approach. Int J Hum Resour Manage. 2011, 22 (6): 1221-1231. 10.1080/09585192.2011.559095.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Martin LG, Freedman VA, Schoeni RF, Andreski PM: Health and functioning among baby boomers approaching 60. J Gerontol. 2009, 64 (3): 369-377.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Costa G, Milia LD: Aging and shift work: a complex problem to face. Chronobiol Int. 2008, 25 (2&3): 165-181.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. von Bonsdorff ME: Age-related differences in reward preferences. Int J Hum Resour Manage. 2011, 22 (06): 1262-1276. 10.1080/09585192.2011.559098.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Szinovacz ME: Introduction: the aging workforce: challenges for societies, employers and older workers. J Aging Soc Policy. 2011, 23 (2): 95-100. 10.1080/08959420.2011.555185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson GF, Hussey PS: Population aging: a comparison among industrialized countries. Health Aff. 2000, 19 (3): 191-203. 10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.191.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Borowski A: Raising the age pension eligibility age and its (dis)contents. Australas J Ageing. 2010, 29 (3): 100-102. 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2010.00459.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Australian Bureau of Statistics: CENSUS population figures [internet database]. 2006, [cited 10/02/2011] [http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/ABSNavigation/prenav/ViewData]Google Scholar
  9. Raymo JM, Warren JR, Sweeney MM, Hauser RM, Jeong-Hwa H: Precarious employment, bab jobs, labor unions, and early retirement. J Gerontol. 2011, 66B (2): 249-259. 10.1093/geronb/gbq106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Schofield DJ, Passey ME, Earnest A, Gloor IA, Shrestha R: Are we getting healthier as we grow older? Implications for baby boomers labor force participation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007, 1114: 230-240. 10.1196/annals.1396.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Coe NB, Zamarro G: Retirement effects on health in Europe. 2008, RAND Labor and Population working paper, [cited 4/11/2013] [http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/working_papers/2008/RAND_WR588.pdf]Google Scholar
  12. Australian Government Productivity Commission: Economic implications of an ageing Australia. 2009, Australia: CanberraGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen H, Cohen P, Kasen S: Cohort differences in self-rated health: Evidence from a Three-decade, community-based, longitudinal study of women. Am J Epidemiol. 2007, 166 (4): 439-446. 10.1093/aje/kwm100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Austen S, Ong R: The employment transitions of mid-life women: health and care effects. Aging and Society. 2010, 30: 207-227. 10.1017/S0144686X09990511.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Gong H, McNamara J: National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling. Workforce participation and non-participation among baby boomers in Australia. 2011, Canberra: ACTGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson RW, Mermin GBT, Resseger M: Job demands and work ability at older ages. J Aging Soc Policy. 2011, 23: 101-118. 10.1080/08959420.2011.551465.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Spoehr J, Barnett K, Parnis E: Experience works: The mature age employment challenge. 2009, The Australian Institute for Social Research, [cited 28/10/2013] [http://www.productiveageing.com.au/userfiles/file/Experience%20works-full%20reportFINAL_web.pdf]Google Scholar
  18. O’Loughlin K, Humpel N, Kendig: Impact of the global financial crisis on employed Australian baby boomers: a national survey. Australas J Ageing . 2010, 29 (2): 88-91. 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2010.00425.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kubicek B, Korunka C, Raymo JM, Hoonakker P: Psychological well-being in retirement: the effects of personal and gendered contextual resources. J Occup Health Psychol. 2011, 16 (2): 230-246.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cobb-Clark DA, Stillmen S: The retirement expectations of middle-aged individuals. 2006, IZA discussion paper, [cited 6/11/2013] [http://ftp.iza.org/dp2449.pdf]Google Scholar
  21. Cai L, Cong C: Effects of health and chronic diseases on labour force participation of older working-age Australians. Aust Econ Pap. 2009, 48 (2): 166-182. 10.1111/j.1467-8454.2009.00365.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunter W, Wang W, Worsley A: Retirement planning and expectations of Australian baby boomers. Are they ready to retire?. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007, 1114: 267-278. 10.1196/annals.1396.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Grant J, Taylor AW, Ruffin R, Wilson DW, Phillips PJ, Adams RJT, Price K and the North West Health Study Team: Cohort profile: The North West Adelaide Health Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2009, 38: 1479-1486. 10.1093/ije/dyn262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Grant JF, Chittleborough CR, Taylor AW, Dal Grande E, Wilson DH, Phillips PJ, Ruffin R and the North West Adelaide Health Study team: The North West Adelaide Health Study: methodology and baseline self-reported and biomedical results of a cohort along a chronic disease and risk factor continuum. Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2006, 3: 4-10.1186/1742-5573-3-4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Taylor AW, Dal Grande E, Appleton S, Gill TK, Shi Z, Adams R: Weighting of the data and analytical approaches may account for differences in overcoming the in-adequate representativeness of the respondents to the third wave of a cohort study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013, 66 (4): 461-464. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin SA MS, Haren MT, Taylor AW, Middleton SM, Wittert GA and members of the Florey Adelaide Male Ageing Study (FAMAS): Chronic disease prevalence and associations in a cohort of Australian men: The Florey Adelaide Male Ageing Study (FAMAS). BMC Public Health. 2008, 8: 261-10.1186/1471-2458-8-261.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Armstrong T, Bauman A, Davies J: Physical activity patterns of Australian adults: results of the. 1999, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, [cited 30/11/2013] [http://aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=6442454841], National Physical Activity SurveyGoogle Scholar
  28. World Health Organization: BMI classification. 2006, [cited 29/04/2013] [http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?introPage=intro_3.html]Google Scholar
  29. National Health and Medical Research Council: Dietary guidelines for Australians: a guide to health eating. 2005, [cited 22/11/2011] [http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/n31.pdf]Google Scholar
  30. Kessler R, Andrews G, Colpe LG, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SL, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM: Short screening scales to monitor population prevalence and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med. 2002, 32 (06): 959-976. 10.1017/S0033291702006074.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Slade T, Johnston A, Teesson M, Whiteford H, Burgess P, Pirkis J, Saw S: The mental health of Australians 2: Report on the 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. 2009, Canberra: Department of Health and AgeingGoogle Scholar
  32. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S: Applied Logistic Regression. 2004, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2Google Scholar
  33. Biggs S, Phillipson C, Money AM, Leach R: The age-shift: Observations on social policy, ageism and the dynamics of the adult lifecourse. J Soc Work Pract. 2006, 20 (3): 239-250. 10.1080/02650530600931708.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. de Wind A, Geuskens GA, Reeuwijk KG, Westerman MJ, Ybema JF, Burdorf A, Bongers PM, van der Beek A: Pathways through which health influences early retirement: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2013, 13: 292-10.1186/1471-2458-13-292.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Gill T, Taylor AW, Broderick D, Avery J, Dal GE: Self reported overall health status: Implications for intervention strategies. Australas Med J. 2009, 1 (8): 44-57.Google Scholar
  36. Harris A: Diabetes, cardiovascular disease and labour force participation in Australia: An endogenous multivariate probit analysis of clinical prevalence data. Econ Rec. 2009, 85 (271): 472-484. 10.1111/j.1475-4932.2009.00572.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Sargent-Cox K, Butterworth P, Asnstey KJ: The global financial crisis and psychological health in a sample of Australian older adults: a longitudinal study. Soc Sci Med. 2011, 73: 1105-1112. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.063.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Humpel N, O’Loughlin K, Snoke M, Kendig H: Australian baby boomers talk about the global financial crisis. Australas J Ageing. 2010, 29 (3): 130-133. 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2010.00474.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Healy E: Population ageing and the employment surge among older Australian workers. People and Place. 2009, 17 (2): 1-15.Google Scholar
  40. Quine S, Cater S: Australian baby boomers’ expectations and plans for their old age. Australas J Ageing. 2006, 25 (1): 3-8. 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2006.00147.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Mermin GBT, Johnson RW, Murphy DP: Why do boomers plan to work longer?. J Gerontol. 2007, 62B (5): S286-S294.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Parker SC, Rougier J: The retirement behaviour of the self-employed in Britain. Appl Econ. 2007, 39 (6): 697-713. 10.1080/00036840500447807.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Zissimopoulos JM, Karoly LA: Transitions to self-employment at older ages: The role of wealth, health, health insurance and other factors. Labour Econ. 2007, 14: 269-295. 10.1016/j.labeco.2005.08.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Reeuwijk KG, de Wind A, Westerman MJ, Ybema JF, van der Beek A, Geuskens GA: ‘All those things together make me retire’: a qualitative study on early retirement among Dutch employees. BMC Public Health. 2013, 13: 516-10.1186/1471-2458-13-516.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Shacklock K, Brunetto Y: A model of older workers’ intentions to continue working. Emerald Rev. 2011, 40 (2): 252-274.Google Scholar
  46. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/355/prepub

Copyright

© Taylor et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.