Prevalence of Clostridium difficilein raw beef, cow, sheep, goat, camel and buffalo meat in Iran
© Rahimi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 27 August 2013
Accepted: 8 January 2014
Published: 5 February 2014
Clostridium difficile has been shown to be a nosocomial pathogen associated with diarrhoea and pseudomembranous colitis in hospitalised patients and the infection is believed to be acquired nosocomially. Recent studies have shown the occurrence of C. difficile in food animals which may act as a source of infection to humans.The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of C. difficile in retail raw beef, cow, sheep, goat, camel and buffalo meat in Iran.
From April to October 2012, a total of 660 raw meat samples from beef, cow, sheep, goat, camel and buffalo were purchased from 49 butcheries in Isfahan and Khuzestan provinces, Iran, and were evaluated for the presence of C. difficile using a method including selective enrichment in C. difficile broth, subsequent alcohol shock-treatment and plating onto C. difficile selective medium. C. difficile isolates were tested for the presence of toxin genes and were typed using PCR ribotyping.
In this study, 13 of 660 meat samples (2%) were contaminated with C. difficile. The highest prevalence of C. difficile was found in buffalo meat (9%), followed by goat meat (3.3%), beef meat (1.7%), cow (0.94%) and sheep meat (0.9%). Seven of the 13C. difficile strains (53.9%) were positive for tcdA, tcdB and cdtB toxin genes and were classified as ribotype 078. Four strains (30.8%) were positive tcdA, and tcdB, and one strain (7.7%) was possessed only tcdB. The remaining isolate was non-toxigenic. Susceptibilities of 13C. difficile isolates were determined for 11 antimicrobial drugs using the disk diffusion assay. Resistance to clindamycin, gentamycin, and nalidixic acid was the most common finding.
To our knowledge, the present study is the first report of the isolation of C. difficile from raw buffalo meat. This study indicates the potential importance of food, including buffalo meat, as a source of transmission of C. difficile to humans.
KeywordsClostridium difficile Raw meat Camel Buffalo Beef Antimicrobial resistance
Clostridium difficile is a Gram-positive, anaerobic, spore-forming bacterium that has come to the forefront as an important human pathogen. It was initially dismissed as commensal in healthy infants, but was recognized as an important cause of antimicrobial-associated with diarrhoea in the 1970s. It is, now, the most commonly diagnosed cause of antimicrobial-associated and hospital-associated diarrhoea, and the cause of virtually all cases of pseudomembranous colitis . C. difficile infection (CDI) more recently was described in non-hospitalized patients without underlying disease or a predisposing risk factor such as antimicrobial exposure, advanced age or significant comorbidities [2, 3].
C. difficile also appears to be an important cause of enteric disease or a commensal in a wide variety of animal species [4–6]. Food animals are an important source of enteropathogens, and C. difficile has been isolated from food animals such as poultry and sheep [4–7], pigs [8, 9], chickens, goats and cattle  and calves . The types of C. difficile found in animals and humans are often indistinguishable [10–12] raising concerns that C. difficile might be a zoonotic pathogen [9, 11]. In particular, ribotype 078 is commonly found in food animals [5, 13] and an increasingly reported cause of community-associated CDI in humans [5, 14].
The epidemiology of CDI in Iran is poorly understood. The recent finding of ribotype 078 as the leading ribotype in a small study of CDI in humans in Iran  raised concern about the potential for food as a source of infection, but the prevalence of C. difficile in food in Iran has never been reported. The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of C. difficile in retail raw beef, cow, sheep, goat, camel and buffalo meat in Iran.
From April to October 2012, a total of 660 raw meat samples from beef (young cattle) (n = 121), cow (adult dairy cow) (n = 106), sheep (n = 150), goat (n = 92), camel (n = 124) and buffalo (n = 67) were purchased unpacked from 49 butcheries in Isfahan and Khuzestan provinces, Iran. These cities are the most prominent national cultural and tourist centers located in the center and south of the country, respectively. From each city 40–55 samples (about 0.5 kg / sample; two sections of meat (10 cm × 10 cm × 3 cm) from neck of each carcasses were aseptically removed) were purchased monthly. All samples were placed in separate sterile plastic bags to prevent from spilling and cross contamination and were immediately transported to the laboratory in a cooler with ice packs and processed within 6 h.
Isolation and identification of C. difficile
The samples were processed immediately upon arrival using aseptic techniques. The detection and isolation method used were based on the method described by Rodriguez-Palacios et al.  and de Boer et al. . Briefly, 5 g of each sample was transferred to 20 mL of C. difficile broth (CDB; Oxoid SR0048) containing 40 g/l proteose peptone, 5.0 g/l, disodium hydrogen phosphate, 0.1 g/l magnesium sulphate, 2.0 g/l sodium chloride, 6.0 g/lfructose and 1.0 g/l sodium taurocholate supplemented with C. difficile selective supplement (Oxoid, UK, Code: SR0173) and 5% (v/v) defibrinated sheep blood. After incubation at 37°C for 10 to 15 days under anaerobic conditions 2 mL of the enrichment broth was added to 2 mL of 96% ethanol in a centrifuge tube and homogenized for 50 min on a shaker at room temperature. After centrifugation (3800 × g for 10 min), a loopful of the sediment was streaked onto C. difficile agar base (Oxoid, UK, Code: CM0601) supplemented with an antibiotic supplement for the selective isolation of C. difficile (Oxoid, UK, Code: SR0173) and 7% (v/v) defibrinated sheep blood and the plates were incubated for 48 h at 37°C, under anaerobic conditions. Three colonies per plate were subcultured onto tryptone soya agar (Oxoid, UK, Code: CM0131) and tested by standard microbiological and biochemical procedures including odour, Gram stain morphology and L-proline aminopeptidase test . Crudely extracted DNA [boiling method: One colony was suspected in 500 μl distilled water and after heating for 10 min at 95°C, the suspension was centrifuged (5 min, 10000 × g)] was used for PCR confirmation (tpi gene detection), determination of toxin gene (tcdA, tcdB and cdtB), and PCR ribotyping of isolates as performed in previous studies [17, 18]. For assurance managed at the lab positive and negative controls were included in each batch.
The limitations of the study include the small number of C. difficile isolates which were analysed in the study and the impossibility of sampling from other areas of Iran.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done by the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method using Mueller–Hinton agar (HiMedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India) according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)  as has been previously described . The antimicrobial agents tested and their corresponding concentrations were as follows: nalidixic acid (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), doxycycline (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), metronidazol (5 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), vancomycin (30 μg), and clindamycin (2 μg). After incubating the inoculated plate for 48 h at 37°C, under anaerobic conditions, the susceptibility of the C. difficile to each antimicrobial agent was measured and the results were interpreted in accordance with interpretive criteria provided by CLSI .
Results and discussion
Prevalence of Clostridium difficile detected in beef, cow, sheep, goat, camel and buffalo meat samples in Iran
No. of samples
No. ofC. difficile-positive samples
No. of isolates positive for toxins
The highest prevalence of C. difficile was found in buffalo meat samples (6/67), followed by goat (3/92), beef (2/121) and sheep (1/150) (Table 1). All the camel meat samples found to be negative. Toxigenic C. difficile strains (tcdA, tcdB and cdtB toxin genes) were detected in 12/13 of isolates. Seven of the 13C. difficile strains (53.9%) were positive fortcdA, tcdB and cdtB toxin genes. Four strains (30.8%) were positive tcdA, and tcdB, and one strain (7.7%) was possessed only tcdB. The remaining isolate was non-toxigenic. Our finding of C. difficile and its toxigenic strains in meat are supported by similar reports from other counters [9, 15, 16, 20–23]. The low prevalence of C. difficile in cow, beef, goat and sheep meat samples are comparable with those reported by others [16, 20–23]. However, higher contamination rates (20% to 50%) have also been reported [9, 15]. In contrast, Von Abercron et al.  did not detect C. difficile in meat samples other than beef. Whether this reflects a true different prevalence or is due to differences in sampling techniques employed (meat sample, carcass swab or carcass rinse fluid sample), seasonal effects  and/or laboratory methodologies employed in different studies is not clear.
The source of C. difficile in food products is unclear. Contamination of meat might be due to C. difficile residing in the gastrointestinal tract of animals, but could also originate from the hands of personnel working in the slaughterhouse, meat processing equipment or the slaughterhouse environment during the slaughtering process [5, 25, 26]. The prolonged survival of C. difficile spores in the environment increases the possibilities for contamination of animals and foods. Another potential source of infection that requires investigation is the presence of C. difficile spores in healthy muscle tissue in living animals .
Seven of the 13C. difficile strains were positive for tcdA, tcdB and cdtB toxin genes and were classified as ribotype 078. The predominance of ribotype 078 is consistent with other studies of food animals and food [8, 23, 27]. Given the presence of this strain in humans in the same region with CDI, consideration must be given as to whether food might be the source. However, further study is required to determine whether food is a reasonable source of infection.
Antimicrobial resistance of 13 Clostridium difficile isolated from beef, cow, sheep, goat, camel and buffalo meat in, Iran
This study indicates that the potential importance of food, including buffalo meat, as a source of transmission of C. difficile to humans. Slaughterhouses can be heavily contaminated with foodborn pathogens [29–31], the maintenance of slaughter hygiene, regular microbiological monitoring of carcasses, implementation of good manufacturing practices and a food safety system such as the HACCP system are essential to minimize the risk to the consumer. To the author’s knowledge, the present study is the first report of the isolation of C. difficile from raw beef, cow, goat, sheepand buffalo meat in Iran. Further studies are required to determine the prevalence of C. difficile in meat in Iran and to explore the potential risk of human infection with C. difficile via consumption of meat.
- C. difficile:
C. difficile infection
Polymerase chain reaction
Clinical laboratory standards institute.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Hassn Momtaz, Dr. Amir Shakerian, Mohammad Jahanmard and Manouchehr Momeni for the sincere help in performing technical parts of the project. We are also grateful to Pouya Parsaei, Morteza Moosavian, Iman Azadkhah, and Ali Rasooli for assistance with sampling. This work was supported by the Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord Branch-Iran grant 148.
- Weese JS: Clostridium difficile in food-innocent bystander or serious threat?. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010, 16: 3-10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bauer MP, Veenendaal D, Verhoef L, Bloembergen P, van Dissel JT, Kuijper EJ: Clinical and microbiological characteristics of community-onset Clostridium difficile infection in The Netherlands. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009, 15: 1087-1092. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02853.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilcox MH, Mooney L, Bendall R, Settle CD, Fawley WN: A case–control study of community-associated Clostridium difficile infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008, 62: 388-396. 10.1093/jac/dkn163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harvey RB, Norman KN, Andrews K, Hume ME, Scanlan CM, Callaway TR, Anderson RC, Nisbet DJ: Clostridium difficile in poultry and poultry meat. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2011, 8: 1321-1323. 10.1089/fpd.2011.0936.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keessen EC, Gaastra W, Lipman LJA: Clostridium difficile infection in humans and animals, differences and similarities. Vet Microbiol. 2011, 153: 205-217. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.03.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simango C, Mwakurudza S: Clostridium difficile in broiler chickens sold at market places in Zimbabwe and their antimicrobial susceptibility. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008, 124: 268-270. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Al Saif N, Brazier JS: The distribution of Clostridium difficile in the environment of South Wales. J Med Microbiol. 1996, 45: 133-137. 10.1099/00222615-45-2-133.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Songer JG, Trinh HT, Killgore GE, Thompson AD, McDonald LC, Limbago BM: Clostridium difficile in retail meat products, USA 2007. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009, 15: 819-821. 10.3201/eid1505.081071.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Songer JG: Clostridia as agents of zoonotic disease. Vet Microbiol. 2010, 140: 399-404. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.07.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez-Palacios A, Stämpfli HR, Duffield T, Peregrine AS, Trotz-Williams LA, Arroyo LG, Brazier JS, Weese JS: Clostridium difficile PCR ribotypes in calves, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006, 12: 1730-1736. 10.3201/eid1211.051581.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Goorhuis A, Debast SB, Van Leengoed LA, Harmanus C, Notermans DW, Bergwerff AA, Kuijper EJ: Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 078: an emerging strain in humans and in pigs?. J ClinMicrobiol. 2008, 46: 1157-1158.Google Scholar
- Rupnik M, Wilcox MH, Gerding DN: Clostridium difficile infection: new developments in epidemiology and pathogenesis. Natur Rev Microbiol. 2009, 7: 526-536. 10.1038/nrmicro2164.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pirs T, Ocepek M, Rupnik M: Isolation of Clostridium difficile from food animals in Slovenia. J Med Microbiol. 2008, 57: 790-792. 10.1099/jmm.0.47669-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jalali M, Khorvash F, Warriner K, Weese JS: Clostridium difficile infection in an Iranian hospital. BMC Res Notes. 2012, 5: 159-10.1186/1756-0500-5-159. 10.1186/1756-0500-5-159View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez-Palacios A, Staempfli HR, Duffield T, Weese JS: Clostridium difficile in retail ground meat Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007, 13: 485-487. 10.3201/eid1303.060988.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- de Boer E, Zwartkruis-Nahuis A, Heuvelink AE, Harmanus C, Kuijper EJ: Prevalence of Clostridium difficile in retailed meat in The Netherlands. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011, 144: 561-564. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.11.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bidet P, Barbut F, Lalande V, Burghoffer B, Petit J: Development of a new PCR-ribotyping method for Clostridium difficile based on ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999, 175: 261-266. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13629.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lemee L, Dhalluin A, Testelin S, Mattrat M, Maillard K, Lemeland J, Pons JL: Multiplex PCR targeting tpi (triose phosphate isomerase), tcdA (Toxin A), and tcdB (Toxin B) genes for toxigenic culture of Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 5710-5714. 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5710-5714.2004.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI): Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; 7th ed, CLSI document M11–A7. 2007, Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards InstituteGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez-Palacios A, Reid-Smith RJ, Staempfli HR, Daignault D, Janecko N, Avery BP, Martin H, Thompson AD, McDonald LC, Limbago B, Weese JS: Possibility of seasonality of Clostridium difficile in retail meat, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009, 15: 802-805. 10.3201/eid1505.081084.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bouttier S, Barc MC, Felix B, Lambert S, Collignon A, Barbut F: Clostridium difficile in ground meat, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010, 16: 733-735. 10.3201/eid1604.091138.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jöbstl M, Heuberger S, Indra A, Nepf R, Köfer J, Wagner M: Clostridium difficile in raw products of animal origin. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010, 138: 172-175. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.12.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Curry SR, Marsh JW, Schlackman JL, Harrison LH: Prevalence of Clostridium difficilein uncooked ground meat products from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012, 78: 4183-4186. 10.1128/AEM.00842-12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Von Abercron SMM, Karlsson F, Wigh GT, Wierup M, Krovacek K: Low occurrence of Clostridium difficile in retail ground meat in Sweden. J Food Prot. 2009, 72: 1732-1734.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker AA, Davis E, Rehberger T, Rosener D: Prevalence and diversity of toxigenic Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium difficile among swine herds in the midwest. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010, 76: 2961-2967. 10.1128/AEM.02459-09.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Thitaram SN, Frank JF, Lyon SA, Siragusa GR, Bailey JS, Lombard JE, Haley CA, Wagner BA, Dargatz DA, Fedorka-Cray PJ: Clostridium difficile from healthy food animals: optimized isolation and prevalence. J Food Prot. 2011, 74: 130-133. 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-10-229.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Avbersek J, Janezic S, Pate M, Rupnik M, Zidaric V, Logar K, Vengust M, Zemljic M, Pirs T, Ocepek M: Diversity of Clostridium difficile in pigs and other animals in Slovenia. Anaerobe. 2009, 15: 252-255. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.07.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Indra A, Schmid D, Huhulescu S, Hell M, Gattringer R, Hasenberger P, Fiedler A, Wewalka G, Allerberger F: Characterization of clinical Clostridium difficile isolates by PCR ribotyping and detection of toxin genes in Austria, 2006–2007. J Med Microbiol. 2008, 57: 702-708. 10.1099/jmm.0.47476-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rahimi E, Momtaz H, Bonyadian M: PCR detection of Campylobacter sp. from turkey carcasses during processing plant in Iran. Food Control. 2010, 21: 692-694. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.10.009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rahimi E, Momtaz H, Ameri M, Ghasemian Safai H, Ali Kazemi M: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter species isolated from chicken carcasses during processing in Iran. Poult Sci. 2010, 89: 1015-1020. 10.3382/ps.2009-00090.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rahimi E, Momtaz H, Nozarpour N: Prevalence of Listeria spp., Campylobacter spp., and Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolated from camel during processing. BJVM. 2010, 13: 179-185.Google Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/119/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.