More of the same or a change of scenery: an observational study of variety and frequency of physical activity in British children
© Brooke et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 15 January 2013
Accepted: 14 August 2013
Published: 16 August 2013
Physical activity is important for children’s health, but successful physical activity promotion is challenging. Whether performing many different types of activities (Variety) is associated with higher physical activity independent of the number of activity sessions (Frequency) is unknown, but this information could inform physical activity promotion and public health strategies in children.
In the SPEEDY study we measured moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA; ≥2000 counts/minute) over 7 days using GT1M Actigraph accelerometers in 1700 children from Norfolk, UK (56% girls, Mean ± SD 10.3 ± 0.3 years-old). Children reported participation in 28 leisure-time activities over the previous 7 days. Sex differences in activity participation were assessed using multilevel logistic regression, clustered by school. Associations of log-transformed MVPA with z-score-Variety (number of different activities/week) and z-score-Frequency (sum of all activity sessions/week) were examined using multilevel linear regression, adjusted for age, sex, parental education and age-standardised BMI.
Children’s activity participation often reflected gender stereotypes. Mean ± SD Variety was 10.8 ± 5.0 activities/week, and Frequency was 24.2±15.0 sessions/week. In separate models lnMVPA had similar strength, positive associations with z-score-Variety and z-score-Frequency (Exp β(95% CI); Variety 1.04(1.02-1.06), Frequency 1.04(1.02-1.06)). lnMVPA was not associated with z-score-Variety independent of z-score-Frequency (Variety 1.01(0.98-1.04), Frequency 1.03(1.00-1.06)).
Future physical activity interventions and public health strategies could allow for gender specific activity preferences and could target both Variety and Frequency of activities participated in by children.
KeywordsChildren Physical activity Accelerometer Primary school Intervention Public health
In children and adolescents, physical activity is inversely associated with metabolic syndrome and clustered cardiovascular risk factors [1–3]. The British government recommends that children participate in a minimum of 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) each day , however, only 30–40% of youth (2–18 years old) meet these guidelines . It is therefore important to develop effective interventions and public health strategies to promote physical activity in young people, particularly as interventions to date have had limited success .
Interventions to promote physical activity often aim to increase participation in specific modes of activity (i.e. specific activities, e.g. walking or dancing) but relatively little is known about the mode of activities participated in by British children and how this is related to objectively measured physical activity. There is some evidence regarding participation in specific activities among young people from Australia, New Zealand and USA but activity mode is likely to substantially differ across different countries due to both climate and cultural norms [7–11]. A study in British adolescents broadly grouped activities into six categories (housework, sedentary activities, outside activities, active jobs, sports participation and active travel), and suggested that activity type and context may vary according to objectively measured activity level .
The volume of activity recommended by physical activity guidelines can be achieved by performing few activities several times per week or by performing many different activities less often. However, it is unknown whether the number of types of activities children participate in each week (Variety) is associated with objectively measured physical activity independent of how often activity is performed each week (Frequency). Previous evidence is inconclusive indicating that although participation in a number of different physical activities may be important for activity maintenance throughout adolescence , proxy reported Variety was not associated with objectively measured physical activity in children and was not examined independent of overall activity frequency . Therefore it is uncertain whether public health strategies and interventions to promote physical activity in children could benefit from specifically focusing on Variety or Frequency of activity participation or whether both are equally important.
It may be prudent for interventions promoting physical activity to be targeted towards particular population subgroups, such as girls or overweight individuals . Understanding the characteristics of physical activity behaviour within subgroups and how it is associated with overall physical activity level could inform future physical activity guidelines and the development of effective strategies to promote physical activity. It could be beneficial for physical activity guidelines to recommend a minimum number of different types of activity for children to participate in, or to design an intervention with opportunities for children to try a wide range of different activities. These strategies may be more valuable for certain population subgroups than others.
We aimed to describe 10-year old children’s participation in common activities and examine differences in Variety and Frequency of activity participation between population subgroups. We also aimed to explore associations of self-reported Variety and Frequency of activities of at least moderate intensity with objectively measured physical activity, specifically focusing on MVPA as suggested by the current British physical activity guidelines .
A cross-sectional examination of data from the Sport, Physical activity and Eating behaviour: Environmental Determinants in Young People (SPEEDY) study was conducted. Full ethical approval was given by the University of East Anglia local research ethics committee. Recruitment and methodology have been described previously . Briefly, 157 out of 227 (69%) primary schools in Norfolk, Eastern England, with more than 12 pupils in Year–5 (aged 9 to 10 years) were approached. Ninety-two schools and 2064 pupils (57% of eligible sample) agreed to participate and were visited for measurements from April to July 2007. Written informed consent was obtained from all pupils (signed by a parent/guardian and the child).
Trained research assistants visited each school; they performed anthropometric measurements according to standard procedures and supervised the children completing questionnaires. Children were fitted with an accelerometer and instructed how to wear it. Each child took home a questionnaire for their parent or guardian to complete; they were asked to return this and their accelerometer to school eight days after the measurement day.
Youth physical activity questionnaire (YPAQ)
Self-reported physical activity was assessed using the YPAQ. The YPAQ was based on the Children’s Leisure Activities Study Survey (CLASS) , but adapted for the British population and to capture activities in the last seven days rather than a ‘typical week’. The YPAQ has been shown to adequately rank individual’s overall physical activity in 12–13 year old children (n = 25) . Children reported their participation in 28 moderate-to-vigorous intensity activities during non-school time over the last seven days. Each activity had four response categories (“never”, “one day”, “2 to 3 days” and “four or more”); these were recoded as 0, 1, 2.5 and 4.5 sessions/week for analysis.
Variety was calculated as the sum of types of activities reported to be participated in. Frequency was calculated as the summed sessions/week of all reported activities. Variety and Frequency were transformed to z-scores, calculated as (x – /SD ) to allow comparison of β-coefficients across exposures.
Children were excluded from analyses if they responded to less than a third of YPAQ questions (n = 45). A further 202 children (12% of the sample), had incomplete YPAQ data; we assumed that these children did not participate in activities with no response. There were no substantial differences in results when sensitivity analyses excluding children with any missing YPAQ data were conducted.
Free-living physical activity was assessed over seven days with an ActiGraph accelerometer (GT1M, Actigraph LCC, Pensacola, US) . Uniaxial accelerometers explain between 33 and 78% of the variance in energy expenditure derived from doubly labelled water and indirect calorimetry [19–21]. The children were asked to wear the accelerometer on an elastic waistband on their right hip during waking hours, except whilst bathing, showering or swimming . Data were stored at 5-second intervals [22–25] and a custom programme (MAHUffe, http://www.mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk) was used for data reduction. Data processing was comparable with other studies of similar aged children [26–28]; the first day of data collection (partial day of measurement at school), periods of time when zero counts were recorded continuously for ten or more minutes (‘non wear time’) and counts recorded before 6 am and after 11 pm each day were removed. Children were excluded from analyses if valid accelerometer data were not obtained for at least 500 minutes per day on at least three days (n = 106 without three full measurement days and n = 90 with completely missing accelerometer data). Monitoring physical activity for 480 minutes for three days has achieved an intraclass correlation coefficient (inter-individual variation/total variation) of 0.70 in children of a similar age [28, 29].
MVPA was defined as time spent at ≥2,000 counts per minute (cpm) each day and sedentary time was defined as time spent at ≤100 counts per minute (cpm) each day; both are presented as a daily mean value. A threshold of ≥2,000 cpm is equivalent to walking at approximately 4 km/h in children , and has been used previously to study associations between physical activity intensity and metabolic outcomes in children . Preliminary analyses showed that MVPA did not have normally distributed residuals and so it was log-transformed before further analyses (lnMVPA). Accelerometer data were used to categorise children into those meeting and not meeting the current physical activity guidelines of at least 60 minutes MVPA each day . The least and most active 10% of the sample (both n = 170) were determined based on minutes spent in MVPA.
Measurement of covariates
Children self-reported their date of birth and age was calculated from the measurement date. Simple non-invasive anthropometry measures were conducted with children dressed in light clothing. Portable Leicester height measures were used to measure height to the nearest 0.1 cm. A non-segmental bio-impedance scale (Tanita, type TBF-300A) was used to measure weight to the nearest 0.1 kg. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated and age standardised BMI was derived . Weight status was determined using sex- and age-dependent BMI cut-points (non-overweight vs overweight/obese) .
The parent or guardian self-reported their highest educational qualifications as a proxy measure of socioeconomic status, and home address was used to determine home location. Parent/guardian education level was grouped into ‘General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) or lower’, ‘A-level or lower vocational training’ and ‘University or higher vocational training’. Children’s home location was classified as ‘rural’ (villages, hamlets and isolated dwellings), ‘suburban’ (town and fringe areas) and ‘urban’ (town/city with >10,000 inhabitants) . Children were excluded from analyses if they had missing data for age (n = 0), sex (n = 0), BMI (n = 12) or parent/guardian education (n = 182).
Complete data for outcome, exposures and covariates were available for 1700 children. Children who were excluded from analyses were similar to children who were included for age, sex, BMI, minutes spent in MVPA and parent/guardian education. However, excluded participants spent less time sedentary (mean difference in sedentary time, 11.9 minutes/day, p-value = 0.032) and were more likely to live in an urban vs rural home location (p-value = 0.023) compared to those included in the final sample.
In all statistical analyses ‘school’ was used as a clustering variable to take into account the sampling frame. Linear regression was used where the outcome variable was continuous and logistic regression was used when the outcome variable was categorical.
Multilevel regression analyses were used to test sex differences in descriptive data, sex differences in participation in each YPAQ activity and differences between subgroups in self-reported Variety and Frequency (sex, home location, weight status, meeting physical activity guidelines and parent/guardian education level).
The associations of Variety and Frequency with lnMVPA were also tested using multilevel regression. Variety and Frequency were first considered as exposures in separate models and then as exposures in the same model. Multicollinearity of Variety and Frequency was checked but was not deemed likely to influence the results (variance inflation factor; VIF = 3.77), despite strong correlation (r = 0.86) . Models were adjusted for potential confounding variables: age, sex, parent/guardian education level and BMI z-score. Sensitivity analyses were conducted excluding children with any missing YPAQ data. If Variety or Frequency differed between strata of sample subgroups, interactions between the subgroup and Variety or Frequency were explored in associations with lnMVPA.
Descriptive characteristics of the sample of children from the SPEEDY study used in these analyses
Total (n = 1700)
Girls (n = 953)
Boys (n = 747)
10.3 ± 0.3
10.3 ± 0.3
10.2 ± 0.3
140.6 ± 6.7
140.7 ± 6.7
140.5 ± 6.6
36.6 ± 8.4
37.2 ± 8.8
35.8 ± 7.6
BMI (kg/m 2 )
18.2 ± 3.1
18.5 ± 3.4
17.9 ± 2.8
73.8 ± 24.6
66.0 ± 20.8
83.8 ± 25.5
Sedentary time (mins/day)
456.9 ± 53.9
461.7 ± 51.7
450.8 ± 56.2
Not meeting government PA guidelines
Meeting government PA guidelines
Parent/guardian education level
GCSE or lower
A-level or lower vocational
University or higher vocational
Variety and Frequency of activities stratified by population subgroups
Mean ± sd
Mean ± sd
10.8 ± 5.0
24.2 ± 15.0
Most vs. Least active*
9.9 ± 4.7
11.7 ± 5.2
27.2 ± 14.8
10.4 ± 5.2
11.1 ± 4.9
10.5 ± 4.7
23.4 ± 13.8
11.1 ± 5.3
24.7 ± 15.6
10.8 ± 5.1
22.5 ± 14.0
10.8 ± 5.1
24.1 ± 15.2
10.8 ± 4.6
24.6 ± 14.6
Not meeting government PA guidelines
10.4 ± 4.8
22.8 ± 14.4
Meeting government PA guidelines
11.0 ± 5.1
24.8 ± 15.3
Parent/guardian education level
GCSE or lower
10.8 ± 5.0
24.5 ± 15.0
A-level or lower vocational
10.9 ± 5.2
24.8 ± 15.5
University degree or higher vocational
10.4 ± 4.7
22.5 ± 14.0
Associations of objectively measured MVPA with self reported Variety and Frequency
Variety and Frequency in separate models
Variety and Frequency in the same model
% variance explained by exposure
% variance explained by exposure
Discussion and conclusion
Ten-year old children participated in a wide range of activities which often conformed to gender stereotypes. For example, a greater proportion of boys reported playing football compared to girls. This indicates that within physical activity promotion interventions and public health strategies it may be necessary to allow for personal and gender specific activity preference.
The most commonly reported activity was running, which contrasts with previous studies which have reported walking, basketball, swimming and football as the most common activities in young people [7, 9–11, 35]. Differences in activity participation from previous research may be due to heterogeneous cultures, age ranges, activity questionnaires and season in which data were collected. The current data were collected in spring and summer (April–July) and may reflect seasonal fluctuation in activity participation. For example, Rugby, which in Britain is typically played in winter, had lower participation than Cricket, which is traditionally played in summer. Furthermore, 9% of children reported participation in snow-based activities. Although there was no snow in Norfolk at the time of data collection there is a large ‘dry ski-slope’ in the county, which could explain this finding.
Differences in Variety and Frequency of activities between population subgroups (sex, activity status and parent/guardian education level) suggest that the characteristics of children’s physical activity behaviour are not homogenous. Tailoring interventions and public health strategies to the physical activity characteristics within the target population may therefore be appropriate. For example, an intervention targeting children who do not meet government physical activity guidelines may focus on increasing the Variety and Frequency of activities performed, as both are significantly lower than in children meeting the guidelines.
Results from separate models suggest that Variety and Frequency reflect objectively measured MVPA to a similar extent. However, the associations between Variety and MVPA were not independent of Frequency. This appears to suggest that if the total number of activity sessions performed is high, it may not matter whether children perform many activities few times per week or few activities many times per week. If both approaches result in high total Frequency of activity, they may both result in more MVPA overall. Therefore, both approaches could be relevant to health promotion depending on the population or personal preference. In addition, the lack of significant interactions indicates that the associations of Variety and Frequency with physical activity are similar across population subgroups. This suggests that Variety and Frequency may be relevant components of physical activity to promote for all children. The lack of independence between Variety and Frequency in associations with MVPA could be explained if Frequency is on the causal pathway between Variety and MVPA. It is possible that increasing Variety could increase Frequency and in turn MVPA. Therefore, offering a wide range of activities in interventions promoting physical activity or including a minimum recommended number of different activities in future physical activity guidelines may be relevant. Longitudinal data analysis or a randomized controlled trial is necessary to confirm or refute this suggestion as this cross-sectional study leaves potential for reverse causality.
Strengths and limitations
It was possible to assess associations between objectively measured MVPA and two potentially important and mostly unexplored components of physical activity (Variety and Frequency). Moreover, data were obtained from a large population based sample, aiding the external validity of these results. However, the population of Norfolk is not representative of the rest of the UK , and results should be generalised to other populations with caution.
Accelerometers cannot accurately record activities without vertical hip movement e.g. cycling, and they must be removed for water based activities, therefore physical activity may have been underestimated in children who regularly cycle or swim. The focus of this paper was MVPA so sedentary time and light activity were not incorporated into the main models. The analyses could be repeated with objectively measured sedentary time and light activity as the main outcomes of interest as there may be different associations with Variety and Frequency of specific sedentary and light activities.
Self-report questionnaires are limited in their accuracy for estimating physical activity intensity and duration  but they can provide information about activity type that is not yet easily available from accelerometers. By examining self-reported Variety and Frequency, but not duration of activity the recall bias resulting from self-reported duration of activity should be minimised. We assumed that children’s ability to recall whether or not they participated in an activity may be more accurate than their recollection of activity duration. This is in line with the YPAQ being able to adequately rank children’s physical activity . The questionnaire presented a list of pre-specified activity categories with multiple activities in some items such as ‘Basketball/volleyball’. Therefore, it is unavoidable that for some activities we lose detail about the specific activities that children participated in. Furthermore, the frequency of participation was reported in days per week with a maximum of ‘4 or more times’ in the last seven days. This may result in under-reporting of activities which could be participated in on multiple days and also multiple times per day. We assumed that the 202 children who had less than 1/3rd of YPAQ data missing did not participate in activities with no response. Although this could have led to some error, the sensitivity analysis conducted excluding children with any missing YPAQ data, indicated that this assumption did not affect the results.
Only a small amount of the variance in objectively measured physical activity could be accounted for by self-reported Variety and Frequency. This could be partly because self-reported and objective physical activity was not assessed simultaneously. In addition, the YPAQ only asked about non-school activities, whereas objectively measured physical activity was determined over the whole day. This approach was chosen to inform the development of interventions aiming to facilitate children to increase their activity level over the whole day.
Variety and Frequency were calculated such that when children reported an extra activity (i.e. increased their Variety by one) they also reported at least one extra session (i.e. Increased their Frequency by at least one). Data were tested for multicollinearity and results indicated that it was acceptable to include Variety and Frequency in the same model and therefore the observed associations are unlikely to be artefacts due to the study design .
In future it may be possible to use novel technologies to objectively measure the types of activity being performed, allowing further exploration of the patterns and characteristics of physical activity mode to better inform the design and targeting of physical activity promotion strategies. Longitudinal research with objectively measured physical activity is also necessary to examine whether Variety and Frequency of activities in childhood are associated with activity maintenance, uptake and drop out throughout adolescence and adulthood .
Conclusion and public health implications
Given the wide range of activities reported and the apparent sex differences in participation it may be beneficial for future interventions and public health strategies promoting physical activity in children to allow scope for personal and sex specific activity preference. Furthermore, tailoring interventions to the physical activity characteristics within a target population may increase the chance of developing intervention programs that are acceptable, thus facilitating uptake and adoption. There was no evidence in 9–10 year old British children that activity Variety was associated with objectively measured MVPA independent of activity Frequency. Increasing the Frequency of existing activity or introducing new types of activity may therefore both be potential physical activity promotion strategies. However, longitudinal research is needed to examine whether both aspects of activity are similarly associated with activity maintenance.
Moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity
Log-transformed moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity
Sport, physical activity and eating behaviour: environmental determinants in young people
Youth physical activity questionnaire
Body mass index
Variance inflation factor.
We would like to thank the schools, children and parents for their participation in the SPEEDY study. We also thank everyone who helped with the data collection and Norfolk Children’s Services for their invaluable input and support. In addition, we thank Kate Westgate and Stefanie Mayle from the physical activity technical team at the MRC Epidemiology Unit for their assistance in processing the accelerometer data. The SPEEDY study is funded by the National Prevention Research Initiative http://www.npri.org.uk, consisting of the following Funding Partners: British Heart Foundation; Cancer Research UK; Department of Health; Diabetes UK; Economic and Social Research Council; Medical Research Council; Research and Development Office for the Northern Ireland Health and Social Services; Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Executive Health Department; Welsh Assembly Government and World Cancer Research Fund. HB, KC, SG and EvS are supported by UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence. Funding from the British Heart Foundation, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, the National Institute for Health Research, and the Wellcome Trust, under the auspices of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration, is gratefully acknowledged; and KC, SG, UE and EvS are supported by the Medical Research Council [Unit Programme numbers; Behavioural Epidemiology of Physical Activity MC_UP_1001/2, Physical Activity MC_U106179473 and Prevention MC_U106179474]. The work is also supported by the University of Cambridge.
- Brage S, Wedderkopp N, Ekelund U, Franks PW, Wareham NJ, Andersen LB, Froberg K: Features of the metabolic syndrome are associated with objectively measured physical activity and fitness in Danish children-the European youth heart study (EYHS). Diabetes Care. 2004, 27 (9): 2141-2148. 10.2337/diacare.27.9.2141.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andersen LB, Harro M, Sardinha LB, Froberg K, Ekelund U, Brage S, Anderssen SA: Physical activity and clustered cardiovascular risk in children: a cross-sectional study (the European youth heart study). Lancet. 2006, 368 (9532): 299-304. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69075-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ekelund U, Luan J, Sherar LB, Esliger DW, Griew P, Cooper A: ICAD collaborators: moderate to vigorous physical activity and sedentary time and cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents. JAMA. 2012, 307 (7): 704-712. 10.1001/jama.2012.156.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Department of Health Physical Activity: Health improvement and protection: start active, stay active: a report on physical activity from the four home countries’ chief medical officers. 2011, http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_128210.pdf,Google Scholar
- Ekelund U, Tomkinson GR, Armstrong N: What proportion of youth are physically active? Measurement issues, levels and recent time trends. Br J Sports Med. 2011, 45 (11): 859-865. 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090190.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Metcalf B, Henley W, Wilkin T: Effectiveness of intervention on physical activity of children: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials with objectively measured outcomes (EarlyBird 54). BMJ. 2012, 345: e5888-10.1136/bmj.e5888.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stanley RM, Ridley K, Olds TS: The type and prevalence of activities performed by Australian children during the lunchtime and after school periods. J Sci Med Sport. 2011, 14 (3): 227-232. 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.10.461.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dovey SM, Reeder AI, Chalmers DJ: Continuity and change in sporting and leisure time physical activities during adolescence. Br J Sports Med. 1998, 32 (1): 53-57. 10.1136/bjsm.32.1.53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pate RR, Dowda M, O’Neill JR, Ward DS: Change in physical activity participation among adolescent girls from 8th to 12th grade. J Phys Act Health. 2007, 4 (1): 3-16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bradley CB, McMurray RG, Harrell JS, Deng SB: Changes in common activities of 3rd through 10th graders: the CHIC study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000, 32 (12): 2071-2078. 10.1097/00005768-200012000-00017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aaron DJ, Storti KL, Robertson RJ, Kriska AM, LaPorte RE: Longitudinal study of the number and choice of leisure time physical activities from mid to late adolescence: implications for school curricula and community recreation programs. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002, 156 (11): 1075-1080. 10.1001/archpedi.156.11.1075.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koorts H, Mattocks C, Ness AR, Deere K, Blair SN, Pate RR, Riddoch C: The association between the type, context, and levels of physical activity amongst adolescents. J Phys Act Health. 2011, 8 (8): 1057-1065.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Telford A, Salmon J, Timperio A, Crawford D: Examining physical activity among 5-to 6- and 10-to 12-year-old children: the children’s leisure activities study. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2005, 17 (3): 266-280.Google Scholar
- Corder K, Van Sluijs EM, Ekelund U, Jones AP, Griffin SJ: Changes in children’s physical activity over 12 months: longitudinal results from the SPEEDY study. Pediatrics. 2010, 126 (4): e926-e935. 10.1542/peds.2010-0048.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Sluijs EMF, Skidmore PML, Mwanza K, Jones AP, Callaghan AM, Ekelund U, Harrison F, Harvey I, Panter J, Wareham NJ, Cassidy A, Griffin SJ: Physical activity and dietary behaviour in a population-based sample of british 10-year old children: the SPEEDY study (sport, physical activity and eating behaviour: environmental determinants in young people). BMC Publ Health. 2008, 8: 388-10.1186/1471-2458-8-388.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Telford A, Salmon J, Jolley D, Crawford D: Reliability and validity of physical activity questionnaires for children: the children’s leisure activities study survey (CLASS). Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2004, 16 (1): 64-78.Google Scholar
- Corder K, Van Sluijs EMF, Wright A, Whincup P, Wareham NJ, Ekelund U: Is it possible to assess free-living physical activity and energy expenditure in young people by self-report?. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009, 89 (3): 862-870. 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26739.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trost SG, McIver KL, Pate RR: Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005, 37 (11): S531-S543.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Plasqui G, Westerterp KR: Physical activity assessment with accelerometers: an evaluation against doubly labeled water. Obesity. 2007, 15 (10): 2371-2379. 10.1038/oby.2007.281.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eisenmann JC, Strath SJ, Shadrick D, Rigsby P, Hirsch N, Jacobson L: Validity of uniaxial accelerometry during activities of daily living in children. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004, 91 (2–3): 259-263.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Puyau MR, Adolph AL, Vohra FA, Butte NF: Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. Obes Res. 2002, 10 (3): 150-157. 10.1038/oby.2002.24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dorsey K, Herrin J, Krumholz H, Irwin M: The utility of shorter epochs in direct motion monitoring. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2009, 80 (3): 460-468.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Edwardson CL, Gorely T: Epoch length and its effect on physical activity intensity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010, 42 (5): 928-934. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181c301f5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McClain JJ, Abraham TL, Brusseau TA, Tudor-Locke C: Epoch length and accelerometer outputs in children: comparison to direct observation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008, 40 (12): 2080-2087. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181824d98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nilsson A, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sjostrom M: Assessing physical activity among children with accelerometers using different time sampling intervals and placements. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2002, 14 (1): 87-96.Google Scholar
- Riddoch CJ, Bo Andersen L, Wedderkopp N, Harro M, Klasson-Heggebø L, Sardinha LB, Cooper AR, Ekelund U: Physical activity levels and patterns of 9- and 15-yr-old European children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004, 36 (1): 86-92. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000106174.43932.92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eiberg S, Hasselstrom H, Gronfeldt V, Froberg K, Svensson J, Andersen LB: Maximum oxygen uptake and objectively measured physical activity in Danish children 6–7 years of age: the copenhagen school child intervention study. Br J Sports Med. 2005, 39 (10): 725-730. 10.1136/bjsm.2004.015230.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mattocks C, Ness A, Leary S, Tilling K, Blair SN, Shield J, Deere K, Saunders J, Kirkby J, Smith GD, Wells J, Wareham N, Reilly J, Riddoch C: Use of accelerometers in a large field-based study of children: protocols, design issues, and effects on precision. J Phys Act Health. 2008, 5 (1): S98-S111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trost SG, Pate RR, Freedson PS, Sallis JF, Taylor WC: Using objective physical activity measures with youth: How many days of monitoring are needed?. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000, 32 (2): 426-431. 10.1097/00005768-200002000-00025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trost SG, Ward DS, Moorehead SM, Watson PD, Riner W, Burke JR: Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998, 30 (4): 629-633. 10.1097/00005768-199804000-00023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ekelund U, Sardinha LB, Anderssen SA, Harro M, Franks PW, Brage S, Cooper AR, Andersen LB, Riddoch C, Froberg K: Associations between objectively assessed physical activity and indicators of body fatness in 9- to 10-y-old European children: a population-based study from 4 distinct regions in europe (the European youth heart study). Am J Clin Nutr. 2004, 80 (3): 584-590.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH: Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000, 320 (7244): 1240-1243. 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1240.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bibby P, Shepherd J: Developing a new classification of urban and rural areas for policy purposes–the methodology. 2004, London: RERC, School of Town and Regional Planning, Univeristy of Sheffield and Birkbeck College, Univerisity of London, 30-Google Scholar
- O’Brien RM: A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual Quant. 2007, 41 (5): 673-690. 10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harrell JS, Gansky SA, Bradley CB, McMurray RG: Leisure time activities of elementary school children. Nurs Res. 1997, 46 (5): 246-253. 10.1097/00006199-199709000-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Child and Maternal Health Observatory: Child health profiles-health improvements. 2011, http://atlas.chimat.org.uk/IAS/,Google Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/13/761/prepub