Open Access

Parental divorce in late adolescence does not seem to increase mental health problems: a population study from Norway

  • Henok Zeratsion1Email author,
  • Madeleine Dalsklev2,
  • Espen Bjertness1, 6,
  • Lars Lien3,
  • Ole R Haavet4,
  • Jon A Halvorsen5,
  • Cecilie B Bjertness1 and
  • Bjørgulf Claussen1
BMC Public HealthBMC series ¿ open, inclusive and trusted201313:413

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-413

Received: 2 October 2012

Accepted: 23 April 2013

Published: 30 April 2013



Former studies have shown increased mental health problems in adolescents after parental divorce all over the Western world. We wanted to see if that still is the case in Norway today when divorce turns to be more and more common.


In a prospective study design, two samples were constituted, adolescents at a baseline survey in 2001/02 (n = 2422) and those at follow-up in 2003/04 (n = 1861), when the adolescents were 15/16 and 18/19 years-old, respectively. They answered self-administered questionnaires in both surveys of Young-HUBRO in Oslo. Early parental divorce was defined as that which occured before age 15/16 years, and late divorce occured between age 15/16 and 18/19. Internalized and externalized mental health problems were measured by the Hopkin’s Symptom Check List (HSCL-10) and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).


After linear regression models were adjusted for gender, ethnicity, family economy, social support, and mental health problem symptoms measured at baseline before parental divorce occured, late parental divorce did not lead to significant increase in mental health problems among adolescents in the city of Oslo. Early parental divorce was associated with internal mental health problems among young adolescents when adjusted only for the first four possible confounders.


It seems that parental divorce in late adolescence does not lead to mental health problems in Norway any more, as has been shown before, while such problems may prevail among young adolescents. This does not mean that parental divorce create less problems in late adolescence than before but these youths might have developed adjustment abilities against health effects as divorce have turned to be more common.


HSCL SDQ Adolescents Internalized and externalized mental health problems Mental distress Parental divorce


Mental health problems in children and adolescents after parental divorce have been regularly reported during the last decades [1]. A meta-analysis from 1991 showed that the effect sizes were on a decreasing trend as divorce became more common [2] but still this problem seems to have increased in the 1990s as some social forces have operated more strongly to disadvantage children from divorced families [1].

A Norwegian longitudinal study from the 1990s in Nord-Trøndelag county by Størksen et al. found that adolescents aged 13 to 19 years who experienced parental divorce had higher levels of anxiety and depression than others [3, 4]. Studies from Finland found that mental distress after parental divorce prevailed into adulthood [5, 6], and a recent longitudinal study from Finland by Fröjd et al. also found that adolescents who experienced change in the caretaking parent had increased internalized symptoms when compared with those who did not experience caretaker change or moved away from home [7].

Studies of demographic factors regularly find that internalized symptoms like depression and anxiety generally increase with age among adolescents [3, 8] while Størksen et al. [3] showed that young adolescents of divorced parents had higher mental distress beyond that observed in the general trend. Studies of gender differences have shown mixed results. Dutch girls reported more mental distress symptoms after parental divorce than boys [9], while an American study found the opposite result [10], and other studies have found a similar association among boys and girls [1].

Various family constellations have different effects on adolescents’ mental health [7, 11]. Offsprings of single parents tend to have higher mental distress than adolescents living with both parents [12]. The legal and social differences between cohabiting and married couples are small in Scandinavia today; the most marked difference is that cohabitants have a two to three times higher risk of separation [13].

The objectives of the present longitudinal study were 1) to study if internalized and externalized mental health problems were higher among adolescents who experienced early parental divorce when compared with their 15/16 years-old peers from continuously married parents, and 2) to investigate if such mental health problems were higher among adolescents who experienced late parental divorce when compared with their 18/19 years-old peers whose parents were still married.


This was a cohort study where all 15/16 years-old, 10th grade students in the city of Oslo (n = 4273) were invited to participate in the baseline survey of Young-HUBRO in 2000/2001 [14]. The response rate was 89% (n = 3811).

Self-administered questionnaires were mostly answered in class room sessions; for 13% of the participants the questionnaire was sent by post at the follow-up because they did not attend school any more. Those who stated parents’ marital status was other than married/cohabitants or divorced/separated (n = 191) and those who gave contradictory answers in the two surveys (n = 55) were no more considered for our purpose, and were excluded from the participants in the first survey of Young-HUBRO (n = 3811), giving a new sample of 3565. Of these, 1076 did not participate at the second survey and 67 did not respond to the question on marital status, giving the final baseline sample of 2422 in the present study. The sample at follow-up (n = 1861) was determined after exclusion of those who experienced early parental divorce (n = 530) and those whose parents’ marital status was other than married/cohabitants or divorced/separated at the second survey (n = 31).

Dependent variable: mental health problems

The Hopkin’s Symptom Check List (HSCL-10) was used to measure internalized mental health problems. Ten questions were asked to find out how troubled the participants were by depression and anxiety symptoms during the previous week. Four possible answers scored from 1 (not troubled) to 4 (heavily troubled) gave a continuous variable with score range from 1 to 4.

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ externalized) was used to measure externalized mental health problems that include hyperactivity and conduct symptoms. Considering their own experience in the last six months, the adolescents were asked to rate each of the 10 items by stating one of three possible answers, “not true” (0), “somewhat true” (1) or “certainly true” (2), giving scores from 0 to 20. We combined the hyperactivity and conduct problems into one score, as in other Young HUBRO studies (14,15). The internal reliability using Cronbach’s alpha for HSCL-10 was 0.88 and for SDQ 0.67.

Independent variables

Late parental divorce that occurred between 2001 and 2004 (n = 109) and parental divorce reported in 2001, which was referred to as early parental divorce (n = 530), were our main independent variables. Parental divorce was defined by a question about parents’ marital status: “My parents are: 1) married/cohabitants, 2) unmarried, 3) divorced/separated, 4) one or two are dead, 5) other”. The adolescents’ self-report of biological parents’ split-up in the form of divorce or separation constituted the term “parental divorce”. Adolescents having divorced/separated parents were compared at the same point of time with those whose parents were married or cohabiting partners.

Potential confounders include gender, ethnicity, family economy and social support. These variables are found to be associated with mental distress in other studies [8, 15], and should be adjusted for.

Ethnicity was dichtomized into “western” and “non-western” based on parents’ place of birth according to the definitions of Statistics Norway. Family economy was dichtomized into “above average” and “average and below”, based on the question “I believe, relative to others in Norway, my family has: 1) ‘poor economy’, 2) ‘average economy’; 3) ‘good economy’; or 4) ‘very good economy’.” Social support was created by summarizing the response of two questions that focused on availability of help: “How many persons outside your immediate family are so close to you that you can rely on to get help 1) if you have personal problems, 2) if you have practical problems (for example, school assignments)?” Those who answered “0” or “1” for each of these two separate questions formed the low social support category and the rest were grouped to form the high social support category. This gave a cut-off point at 85th and 78th percentile in the first and the second question, respectively. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.57, and mean inter-item correlation value was 0.42 which is within an optimal range for a scale with fewer than 10 items [16]. The number of people to whom the adolescents can talk and rely on for help when they have personal or practical problems was used as a proxy measure for social support which is also used in other studies (8).

Missing values

We included in the baseline sample those who participated in both surveys and answered the main questions, giving missing values of 32% of the 3565 respondents in the first Young-HUBRO survey. 42% of non-western and 27% of western adolescents were non-respondents. Non-response was random at the other independent variables.


Pearson’s chi square test was used to study bivariate associations (Table 1), and paired samples t-test for difference in mental distress scores (Table 2). Multiple linear regressions were analysed for early and late parental divorces separately using HSCL-10 and SDQ scores as independent variables (Table 3). Potential confounding variables were gender, ethnicity, family economy, and social support measured at baseline. At follow-up, the regression models were controlled for baseline HSCL-10 and SDQ scores rendering a prospective study design.
Table 1

Late parental divorce and early parental divorce (horizontal percentages) across other independent variables at the first survey (vertical percentages)




Independent variables

Frequency (Vertical percentage)

Late divorce

Early divorce

Frequency (Vertical percentage)

Late divorce

Early divorce



1169 (87.2)

54 (4.6)

275 (23.5)**

963 (89.9)

39 (4.0)

221 (22.9)**

 Non western

172 (12.8)

10 (5.8)

24 (14.0)

108 (10.1)

6 (5.6)

7 (6.5)

Family economy

 Average and below

390 (29.6)

20 (5.1)

131 (33.6)**

265 (24.8)

19 (7.2)*

95 (35.8)**

 Above average

927 (70.4)

42 (4.5)

165 (17.8)

803 (75.2)

26 (3.2)

136 (16.9)

Social support


118 (8.8)

5 (4.2)

30 (25.4)

95 (8.9)

3 (3.2)

23 (24.2)


1219 (91.2)

59 (4.8)

269 (22.1)

978 (91.1)

42 (4.3)

208 (21.3)

Significant difference at **(p <0.01) and at *(p < 0.05) between the categories of an independent variable under the same type of parental divorce.

Table 2

Mean test scores at two points of time across parental divorce categories (95% confidence interval)






SDQ externalized



SDQ externalized

Parental divorce











Late divorce


1.66 (1.53-1.80)

1.76 (1.61-1.91)


5.94 (5.39-6.77)


1.39 (1.26-1.52)

1.54 (1.38-1.70)*

6.44 (5.43-7.45)

5.84 (4.98-6.71)

Early divorce


1.69 (1.62-1.75)

1.80 (1.73-1.87)*

5.88 (5.56-6.19)

6.01 (5.70-6.34)


1.34 (1.29-1.39)

1.39 (1.34-1.45)

5.28 (4.87-5.70)

5.11 (4.76-5.51)

Cont. married


1.58 (1.55-1.61)

1.70 (1.67-1.74)*

5.28 (5.11-5.45)

5.31 (5.14-5.48)


1.28 (1.26-1.31)

1.35 (1.32-1.38)*

5.21 (5.00-5.43)

4.90 (4.70-5.10)*

*P < 0.01 for the difference in test scores between the two time points for the same divorce category.

Table 3

Internalized and externalized mental health problems among 15/16 and 18/19 years-old adolescents at baseline and follow-up, across parental divorce (regression coefficients)


Baseline results (n = 2422)

Follow-up results (n = 1861)


Explanatory variables

HSCL-10 (CI:95%)

SDQ (CI:95%)

HSCL-10 (CI:95%)

SDQ (CI:95%)

Crude results

Parental divorce*

0.84 (0.36 – 1.32)

0.31 (0.03 – 0.59)

0.56 (−0.35 – 1.46)

0.42 (−0.04 – 0.88)

Adjusted results

Parental divorce*

0.47 (0.02 – 0.92)

0.15 (−0.14 – 0.43)

0.50 (−0.38 – 1.39)

0.38 (−0.08 – 0.85)


(ref = continuously married)


Gender (ref = boys)

2.99 (2.62 - 3.35)

0.11 (−0.12 – 0.34)

1.86 (1.42 – 2.30)

0.36 (0.14 – 0.58)


Ethnicity (ref = western)

0.14 (−0.44 – 0.73)

−0.28 (−0.65 – 0.10)

0.64 (0.02 – 1.27)

−0-03 (−0.36 – 0.30)


Social support (ref = low)

−3.58 (−4.23 - -2.94)

−1.54 (−1.95 - -1.13)

−1.44 (−2.21 - -0.66)

0.06 (−0.34 – 0.46)


Family economy

−1.42 (−1.84 - -1.00)

−0.58 (−0.85 - -0.31)

−0.53 (−1.04 - -0.02)

−0.19 (−0.46 – 0.07)


(ref = average & below)


*Parental divorce refers to early divorce at baseline and late divorce at follow-up.


Informed consent was given by students and parents. The study was approved by the regional ethical committee for medical research.


Early parental divorce was reported by 22.3% of girls and 21.4% of boys, late divorce by 6.3% and 5.4%, respectively. Western adolescents reported more early divorces than non-western, and so did adolescents from families with average or below average economy (Table 1). Among boys, late parental divorce was also associated with family economy.

After a late parental divorce, HSCL-10 score increased significantly among boys between baseline and follow-up, while among girls the HSCL-10 score increased significantly among those who experienced early divorce (Table 2). Both girls and boys from continuously married parents were also observed to have their HSCL-10 score significantly increased between baseline and follow-up. SDQ scores increased among boys from continuously married parents.

Crude regression results showed that early parental divorce was associated with internalized and externalized mental health problems at age 15/16 years (Table 3). After adjustment, the association of early parental divorce with internalized mental health problems sustained significant, while the association with externalized mental health problems turned to be non-significant. Late parental divorce was not associated with either internalized or externalized mental health problems at follow-up.


We found that late parental divorce which occurred when the adolescents were between 15 and 19 years old had no influence on internalized and externalized mental health problems. Early parental divorce that occurred before the age of 15, on the other hand, was found to have significant association with internalized mental health problem at the baseline survey.

The strength of the study is its prospective design based on a cohort of adolescents aged 15/16 years living in an urban area with diverse cultural, social and economic background. At follow-up, we could compare change in mental distress that ocurred between baseline and follow-up among adolescents who experienced late parental divorce with the change among those whose parents were still married. A limitation is the small sub-sample of those who experienced late parental divorce with risk of type 2 errors. A 32% loss-to-follow-up may influence estimates of prevalence but association measures are shown to be robust to attrition in this sample [14]. Since non-response was common among non-western students our estimates are more unsecure for ethnic non-Norwegians. We have used self-reported mental health symptoms which are well validated [17, 18] but self-reported symptoms are arguable in epidemiological research, especially in children and adolescents [7].

Our results that show association of early parental divorce with internalized mental health problems are supported by earlier Norwegian [4, 11] and other western [19, 20] studies. In the former Norwegian study from Nord-Trøndelag county Størksen et al. found about the same increase in mental distress despite that the divorce rate in their mostly rural area is half of that of Oslo [3, 21]. They had the objectives, among others, of determining whether the effect of early divorce was different at follow-up compared to baseline [1]. We have not found any prospective study like ours of mental health problems after late parental divorce but our results seems to differ from earlier Scandinavian [6, 22, 23] and western studies [1, 19, 20]. We find no increase in mental health problems among adolescents who experienced late parental divorce compared to their 18/19 years-old peers whose parents were still married at follow-up. Two of these three Finish and Swedish studies had data on children and adolescents from about twenty years ago. Thus, the effects of parental distress in late adolescence may have diminished in recent years.

Fröjd et al. recent study from Finland used another method, showing significant influence of caretaker change on depression [7]. We have similar data of caretaker changes, and found the same. In both studies, caretaker change refers to various forms of family transitions including parental divorce. Interestingly, adolescents moving away from home did not show significant changes in internalizing problems in both studies. This only recent study from Scandinavia does not contradict our results.

Another possible interpretation of these results may be that our measures of mental health problems are not good enough; however, our two tests are well validated and much used [17, 18]. A type 2 error because of a small sample is a possibility; in that case the effect among these adolescents in Oslo probably are smaller than found before.

We find it most probable that internalized (anxiety and depression) and externalized (conduct) health problems after parental divorce in late adolescence are not higher any more compared to children of non-divorced parents. This does not mean that parental divorce is not followed by many problems for children and adolecents, both emotional and practical burdens. Our measures are directed towards mental disease-related problems, and they may have been reduced as divorce has turned more common. Other problems of the offsprings after divorce may still be overwhelming, and should get much concern among parents and others taking care of children and adolescents.


While early parental divorce was associated with internalized mental health problems, we do not find such effects of late divorce on adolecents aged 18/19 years in an urban sample. This may mean that our methods are not good enough, or that the adjustment abilities of adolescents of divorce have improved. This does not mean that problems for the offsprings after divorce have become less than in former times.



We thank the National Institue of Public Health for providing data, and Oslo Municipality for supporting the Young-HUBRO study.

Authors’ Affiliations

Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo
Institute of Psychology, University of Oslo
National Center for Dual Diagnoses, Innlandet Hospital Trust HF 2312
Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo
Department of Dermatology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Faculty of Medicin
Tibet University Medical College


  1. Amato PR: Children of divorce in the 1990s: an update of the Amato and Keith (1991) meta-analysis. J Family Psychology. 2001, 3: 355-370.View Article
  2. Amato PR, Keith B: Parental divorce and adult well-being: a meta-analysis. J Marriage and Family. 1991, 53: 43-58. 10.2307/353132.View Article
  3. Størksen I, Røysamb E, Moum T, Tambs K: Adolescents with a childhood experience of parental divorce: a longitudinal study of mental health and adjustment. J Adolescence. 2005, 28: 725-735. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.01.001.View Article
  4. Størkersen I, Røysamb E, Holmen TL, Tambs K: Adolescent adjustment and well-being: effects of parental divorce and distress. Scand J Psychology. 2006, 47: 75-84. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00494.x.View Article
  5. Huurre T, Junkkari H, Aro H: Long-term psychological effects of parental divorce: a follow up study from adolescence to adulthood. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006, 256: 256-263. 10.1007/s00406-006-0641-y.View ArticlePubMed
  6. Mustonen U, Huurre T, Kiviruusu O, Haukkala A, Aro H: Long-term impact of parental divorce on intimate relationship quality in adulthood and the mediating role of psychosocial resources. J Fam Psychology. 2011, 25: 615-619.View Article
  7. Frӧjd S, Marttunen M, Kaltiala-Heino R: The effect of adolescent- and parent-induced family transitions in middle adolescence. Nord Journal of Psychiatry. 2011, 64: 1-6.
  8. Schraedley PK, Gotlib IH, Hayward C: Gender differences in correlates of depressive symptoms in adolescents. J Adolescent Health. 1999, 25: 98-108. 10.1016/S1054-139X(99)00038-5.View Article
  9. Oldehinkel AJ, Ormel J, Veenstra R: Parental divorce and offspring depressive symptoms: Dutch developmental trends during early adolescence. J Marriage and Family. 2008, 70: 284-293. 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00481.x.View Article
  10. Hetherington ME, Cox M, Cox R: Long-term effects of divorce and remarriage on the adjustment of children. J American Academy of Child Psychiciatry. 1985, 24: 518-530. 10.1016/S0002-7138(09)60052-2.View Article
  11. Breivik K, Oleweus D: Adolescents adjustment in four post-divorce family structures. J Divorce Remarriage. 2006, 44 (3–4): 99-124.View Article
  12. Nævdal F, Thuen F: Residence arrangements and well-being: a study of Norwegian adolescents. Scand J Psychol. 2004, 45: 363-371. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00418.x.View ArticlePubMed
  13. Jensen AM, Clausen SE: Barns familier: samboerskap og foreldrebrudd etter. Prosjektrapport nr 21. 1970, Oslo: NIBR
  14. Bjertness E, Sagatun Å, Green K, Lien L, Søgaard AJ, Selmer R: Response rates and selection problems, with emphasis on mental health variables and DNA sampling, in large population-based, cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of adolescents in Norway. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10: 602-PubMed CentralPubMed
  15. Lien L, Haavet OR, Thoresen M, Heyerdahl S, Bjertness E: Mental health problems, negative life events, perceived pressure and the frequency of acute infections among adolescents: results from a cross-sectional, multicultural, population-based study. Acta Pædiatrica. 2007, 96: 301-306.View ArticlePubMed
  16. Briggs SR, Cheek JM: The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. J Pers. 54: 106-148.
  17. Haavet OR, Sirpal MK, Haugen W, Christensen KS: Diagnosis of depressed young people in primary health care - a validation of HSCL-10. Fam Pract. 2011, 28: 233-237. 10.1093/fampra/cmq078.View ArticlePubMed
  18. He JP, Burstein M, Schmitz A, Merikangas KR: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): the actor structure and scale validation in U.S. adolescents. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2012, Epub ahead of print
  19. Kalter N, Kloner A, Schreier S, Okla K: Predictors of children’s post divorce adjustment. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1989, 59: 605-618.View ArticlePubMed
  20. Landsford JE: Parental divorce and children’s adjustment. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009, 4: 140-152. 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01114.x.View Article
  21. Statistics Norway: Marriage, divorce and other family relations. [http://​www.​ssb.​no/​emner/​02/​02/​30/​ekteskap/​tab-2012-08-23-02.​html]
  22. Angarne-Lindberg T, Wadsby M: Fifteen years after parental divorce: mental health and experienced life-events. Nord J Psychiatry. 2009, 63: 32-43. 10.1080/08039480802098386.View ArticlePubMed
  23. Angarne-Lindberg T, Wadsby M: Psychiatric and somatic health in relation to experience of parental divorce in childhood. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2012, 58: 16-25. 10.1177/0020764010382372.View ArticlePubMed
  24. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1471-2458/​13/​413/​prepub


© Zeratsion et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.