Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and metabolic syndrome in adolescents: A cross-sectional study

  • Antonio Stabelini Neto1Email author,
  • Jeffer E Sasaki2,
  • Luis PG Mascarenhas3,
  • Margaret CS Boguszewski3,
  • Rodrigo Bozza4,
  • Anderson Z Ulbrich4,
  • Sergio G da Silva4 and
  • Wagner de Campos4
BMC Public Health201111:674

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-674

Received: 27 January 2011

Accepted: 30 August 2011

Published: 30 August 2011

Abstract

Background

In adults, there is a substantial body of evidence that physical inactivity or low cardiorespiratory fitness levels are strongly associated with the development of metabolic syndrome. Although this association has been studied extensively in adults, little is known regarding this association in adolescents. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness levels with metabolic syndrome in Brazilian adolescents.

Methods

A random sample of 223 girls (mean age, 14.4 ± 1.6 years) and 233 boys (mean age, 14.6 ± 1.6 years) was selected for the study. The level of physical activity was determined by the Bouchard three-day physical activity record. Cardiorespiratory fitness was estimated by the Leger 20-meter shuttle run test. The metabolic syndrome components assessed included waist circumference, blood pressure, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, and fasting plasma glucose levels. Independent Student t-tests were used to assess gender differences. The associations between physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness with the presence of metabolic syndrome were calculated using logistic regression models adjusted for age and gender.

Results

A high prevalence of metabolic syndrome was observed in inactive adolescents (males, 11.4%; females, 7.2%) and adolescents with low cardiorespiratory fitness levels (males, 13.9%; females, 8.6%). A significant relationship existed between metabolic syndrome and low cardiorespiratory fitness (OR, 3.0 [1.13-7.94]).

Conclusion

The prevalence of metabolic syndrome is high among adolescents who are inactive and those with low cardiorespiratory fitness. Prevention strategies for metabolic syndrome should concentrate on enhancing fitness levels early in life.

Background

The term metabolic syndrome (MetS) refers to a clustering of cardiovascular risk factors represented by high blood pressure, overweight/obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), and glucose intolerance. The diagnosis of MetS in adults, and recently in children and adolescents, is established when three or more of the five individual elements exist together in the same subject [1, 2].

Various diagnostic criteria have been proposed by different organizations over the past decade. To standardize the MetS definition, a recent joint scientific statement [3] proposed specific criteria for the clinical diagnosis of MetS in adults. However, there was no consensus regarding the diagnostic criteria for MetS in the pediatric population. Therefore, diagnostic criteria used in adults have been adapted for children and adolescents [4]. These criteria are based on reference values from the NCEP Pediatric Panel report, the American Diabetes Association statement on type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents, and the updated Task Force report on the diagnosis and management of hypertension in childhood [4].

In adults, MetS is associated with a significantly elevated risk of coronary heart disease [5] and diabetes mellitus [6], while in children and adolescents there is a direct relationship between the number of cardiovascular risk factors and the severity of asymptomatic atherosclerosis [7]. There is a substantial body of evidence associating physical inactivity or low cardiorespiratory fitness with the development of MetS in adults [810]. This association in children and adolescents is controversial.

However, evidence suggests that sedentary behavior, low levels of physical activity, and cardiorespiratory fitness in youth track into adulthood [11]. Similarly, metabolic risk factors also appear to track over time [12], and may predispose young people to disease later in life [13].

Based on this information, the aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of MetS and to analyze the association between physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness with MetS in a random sample of Brazilian adolescents.

Methods

Sample

This cross-sectional study was carried out in Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. The city of Curitiba has a population of 1,678,965 inhabitants with a human development index of 0.763. The sample size consisted of school children registered in the education system (approximately 45,000 students). The following parameters were used to estimate the sample size: an error of 5%; an estimated MetS prevalence of 20%; a design effect of 1.5; a 95% confidence interval; and an additional 10% for losses and refusals. A conglomerate sample of 456 adolescents (223 girls [49%] and 233 boys [51%]) was evaluated. The schools were randomly selected, and the proportion of students was established according to the number of students in each of the nine administrative areas of the city (Santa Felicidade 6.6%; Matriz, 12.3%; Boa Vista, 14.7%; Cajuru, 12%; Portão, 10.6%; Boqueirão, 13.1%; Bairro Novo, 9.6%; Pinheirinho, 9.5%; and CIC, 11.6%). Data collection took place between April and November 2009.

All subjects completed a physical activity questionnaire. Height, weight, blood pressure, cardiorespiratory fitness, and lipid profiles were measured in all subjects. Only students between 10 and < 18 years of age were included in the analyses. Exclusion criteria were the known presence of diabetes and the use of medications that alters blood pressure, glucose, or lipid metabolism.

Written informed consent was obtained from the parent or legal guardian of the adolescent after being given a detailed written explanation of the aims of the study, and the possible hazards, discomfort, and inconvenience. All subjects were given the option to drop out at any time without consequence. This research was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Paraná (Resolution 196/96). All procedures and methods in this study conformed to the ethical guidelines established by the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki and the subsequent revisions.

Anthropometric measures

Physical measurements were obtained by trained research assistants after blood sample was taken. The body height was measured without shoes to the nearest 0.1 cm with a transportable stadiometer (Ottoboni HM-210D; Ottoboni, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil). Body weight was measured in light clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg with a calibrated beam balance scale (Toledo 2096 PP; Toledo do Brasil, São Bernardo do Campo, SP, Brazil). Waist circumference was measured at the end of gentle expiration, midway between the lower rib margin and the iliac crest.

Blood pressure

Blood pressure (BP) was measured by trained technicians before the blood sampling procedure. The BP measurement was performed according to the method described in The Fourth Report on the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents [14]. The students were asked to rest in the sitting position for 5-10 min prior to the BP assessment. The systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured in the right arm using a sphygmomanometer of mercury column. Two measurements were obtained after 5 and 10 min of rest. The mean of the two measurements was considered. If the two measurements differed by > 2 mmHg, a third measure was obtained.

Blood sampling

Blood samples were obtained by trained and certified nurses between 8:00 and 9:00 AM following an overnight fast. After the blood samples were collected, the subjects were served breakfast, then continued with the physical and fitness measurements. The samples were immediately centrifuged and the serum or plasma separated and placed on dry ice for shipment back to the chemistry laboratory. A single certified laboratory was used for all analyses. HDL-C, triglycerides, and glucose levels were analyzed by colorimetric assay on a random-access Spectrum CCX analyzer (Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL, USA).

MetS definitions

We used the age-modified standards of the ATP III MetS criteria published previously [4] and utilized in others research [15, 16]. Abdominal obesity was considered as a waist circumference ≥ 90th percentile for age and gender [17]. High blood pressure was considered as a SBP and/or DBP > 90th percentile by age, gender, and height based on published reference data [14]. Adolescents were considered to have excessive total triglycerides levels if blood concentrations were ≥ 110 mg/dL. HDL-C levels were considered low at a level of ≤ 40 mg/dL, while fasting blood glucose levels ≥ 110 mg/dL were considered indicative of hyperglycemia [4]. MetS was diagnosed when three or more of the five individual elements were present together in the same individual.

Physical activity

The Three-Day Physical Activity Record [18] was used to self-record daily activities over 3 days (2 weekdays and 1 weekend day). The daily activities were recorded by adolescents in 15-min segments throughout the day on a scale divided into 9 categories of physical activity (1-2, sedentary activity [lying down and seated]; 3-5, light activity [taking a shower, cooking, taking a walk, and light manual work]; 6-8, moderate activity [sports or leisure activities and moderate manual work; 9, vigorous activity [intense manual work and intense sport or leisure activities]). In this self-report instrument, the subject fills in the boxes corresponding to physical activities performed during the specific time periods.

The questionnaires were self-completed in the classroom with orientation from the researcher. The time spent doing exercises with moderate-to-vigorous intensity (≥ 6 in a physical activity scale) was recorded, then used to determine the total moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) expressed in minutes per day. The mean value from the 3 days was considered for the analysis.

The reproducibility of this instrument was reported to be r = 0.91 in subjects from 10 years of age [18], and was validated in adolescents using the technique of double-labeled water [19].

Cardiorespiratory fitness

Cardiorespiratory fitness was estimated using the 20-meter shuttle run test, as described by Leger et al. [20]. The test was carried out in a gym with a plane surface. The required speed was continuously increased every minute by 0.5 km/h. Subjects kept the required speed by completing every 20-meter stage within the sound of two beep sounds. The interval between these beeps was reduced every minute in order to elicit the speed increments. The velocity in the last stage completed by each subject was recorded and used to calculate the VO2máx in ml.kg-1min-1 according to the equation validated by Léger et al. [20], as follows: VO2máx = 31.025 + 3.238*velocity - 3.248*age + 0.1536*velocity*age. The authors reported a relationship to directly measured VO2máx of 0.84 and a test-retest correlation of 0.98.

Statistical procedures

Descriptive data are shown as the mean and standard deviation. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to verify the normality of the physical activity and physical fitness distribution data. To compare the continuous variables between the genders we used Student's t-test, and the chi-squared test was used for categorical variables.

The prevalence of MetS and its components was calculated with respect to different cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity categories. Fitness levels were determined based on tertiles of cardiorespiratory fitness (boys: low < 46 ml.kg-1min-1, moderate 46-51 ml.kg-1min-1, and high > 51 ml.kg-1min-1; girls: low < 38 ml.kg-1min-1, moderate 38-43 ml.kg-1min-1, and high > 43 ml.kg-1min-1. For physical activity, the thresholds were as follows: inactive < 60 min.day of MVPA; active: ≥ 60 and < 90 min/day of MVPA; very active: ≥ 90 min/day of MVPA.

The associations between physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness with the diagnosis of MetS were calculated using binary logistic regressions. The outcome variable was the presence of MetS. The exposure variables were: participation in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (inactive, active, and very active) and VO2max tertiles (low, moderate, and high). The logistic regression models were adjusted for age and gender. The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 15.0 for Windows; Chicago, IL, USA) [21]. A p value < 0.05 denoted statistical significance.

Results

Descriptive data by gender are shown in Table 1. Boys had higher levels of height, weight, waist circumference, cardiorespiratory fitness, physical activity, SBP, and glucose than girls (p < 0.0001 for all), whereas girls had higher HDL-C values. No differences in age, DBP, and triglycerides levels were observed between genders. The prevalence of MetS was 7.7% among Brazilian adolescents. The prevalence of MetS in boys (10.2%) was significantly higher than in girls (5%; p < 0.05) (Data not shown).
Table 1

Anthropometric, cardiorespiratory fitness, physical activity, and individual risk factors characteristics of Brazilian adolescents by gender

 

Males

N = 233

Females

N = 223

p*

 

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

 

Age (years)

14.6

1.6

14.4

1.6

ns

Height (cm)

167.1

11.6

158.8

7.5

< 0.0001

Weight (kg)

57.1

12.5

51.7

10.8

< 0.0001

Waist circumference (cm)

70.8

8.9

65.5

7.0

< 0.0001

VO2máx (ml.-1kg.-1min-1)

49.0

6.2

40.5

4.7

< 0.0001

MVPA

136.8

103.3

75.1

82.2

< 0.0001

SBP (mmHg)

100.7

13.9

95.1

13.2

< 0.0001

DBP (mmHg)

69.1

10.6

68.1

10.6

ns

HDL-C (mg/dL)

45.2

11.0

49.9

14.1

< 0.0001

Triglycerides (mg/dL)

89.3

41.3

85.1

34.4

ns

Fasting glucose (mg/dL)

89.4

13.6

83.7

13.8

< 0.0001

Data are means (SD), * Student's t-test for differences between gender

Abbreviations: MVPA, Moderate-Vigorous Physical Activity; SBP, Systolic blood pressure; DBP, Diastolic blood pressure; ns, non-significant.

The low HDL-C (33.3%) was the most prevalent component of the MetS criteria, followed by high blood pressure (21.5%), hypertriglyceridemia (19.8%), and hyperglycemia (5.5%) (Data not shown). The prevalence of individual risk factors by gender is shown in Table 2. The prevalence of hyperglycemia and low HDL-C in boys was significantly higher than girls. The proportion of subjects who had 1 or more individual risk factors was 77.1% (Data not shown).
Table 2

Distribution of individual risk factors among Brazilian adolescents by gender

 

Males

N = 233

Females

N = 223

p*

 

%

95% CI

%

95% CI

 

Large waist circumference

10.5

7 - 28.5

10.9

7.3 - 15.5

ns

High blood pressure

22.6

17.8 - 28.5

20.3

15.4 - 25.9

ns

Low HDL-C

39.2

33 - 45.4

27

21.5 - 33

0.006

Hypertriglyceridemia

19.8

15.1 - 25.3

19.8

15 - 25.4

ns

Hyperglycemia

7.8

4.9 - 11.8

3.2

1.5 - 6.3

0.033

*Chi-squared test

Abbreviations: 95% IC, Confidence interval of 95%; ns, non-significant.

The prevalence of MetS by physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness levels is shown in Figures 1 and 2. A higher prevalence of MetS was observed in the inactive adolescents and in the adolescents with low cardiorespiratory fitness (p < 0.05); there was no difference with respect to gender. Significant associations were demonstrated between MetS and cardiorespiratory fitness (Table 3). The subjects with low cardiorespiratory fitness had an odds ratio for MetS of 3 (CI, 1.13-7.94) compared with subjects with high cardiorespiratory fitness. No significant association was observed between MetS and physical activity.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-11-674/MediaObjects/12889_2011_Article_3471_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Prevalence of metabolic syndrome according to time participation in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. *p < 0.05 between the physical activity levels (Chi-squared test).

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-11-674/MediaObjects/12889_2011_Article_3471_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Prevalence of metabolic syndrome according to cardiorespiratory fitness levels. *p < 0.05 between the cardiorespiratory fitness levels (Chi-squared test).

Table 3

Logistic regression of cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity levels with the metabolic syndrome in Brazilian adolescents

  

Metabolic syndrome

OR (95% IC)

 

N

non-adjusted

adjusted for age and gender

High VO2máx (3rd tertile)

152

1

1

Moderate VO2máx. (2nd tertile)

154

1.96

(0.64-7.08)

1.9

(0.70-5.48)

Low VO2máx. (1st tertile)

150

3.32*

(1.16-7.08)

3.0*

(1.13-7.94)

Very active

(≥ 90 min/day of MVPA)

56

1

1

Active

(≥ 60 and < 90 min/day of MVPA)

217

1.77

(0.20-5.68)

1.15

(0.56-2.37)

Inactive (< 60 min/day of MVPA)

183

2.32

(0.29-8.58)

1.25

(0.60-2.60)

* p < 0.05 (Wald test)

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; 95% IC, Confidence interval of 95%.

Discussion

Cardiovascular disease risk factors in children and adolescents have been assessed in many studies. Most studies have looked at a single or a combination of risk factors [2225]. Several studies have also used diverse definitions of pediatric MetS [4, 26, 27]. There are few studies pertaining to the prevalence of MetS in Brazilian children and adolescents with which to compare. Our data showed that the prevalence of MetS in Brazilian adolescents (7.7%) is consistent with previously published studies. Data from these studies suggest that the prevalence of MetS varies between 3% and 12% in a representative sample of youth [4, 15, 16, 28].

Rodrigues et al. [29] evaluated 380 subjects (Vitoria, ES, Brazil) and reported a prevalence of MetS in 1.3% of adolescents. Cavali et al. [30] evaluated 80 obese adolescents (São Paulo, SP, Brazil) and reported a prevalence of 13.7% using the International Diabetes Federation criteria and 15% by Jolliffe and Janssen criteria. These studies highlight the need for standardized criteria to diagnose MetS in children and adolescents. Therefore, findings using different diagnostic criteria for MetS should be made with caution.

Data from the NHANES 1999-2002 showed that adolescents with the lowest physical activity level had a significantly increased prevalence of MetS in both genders [31]. In our study, the associations between physical activity and MetS were not significant. This was the case even when we used a continuous score to define MetS (Data not shown). Nevertheless, determining the MetS prevalence by physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness suggest that adolescents with higher physical activity levels and cardiorespiratory fitness had lower MetS prevalence. Similarly, in the study by Nguyen et al. [32], the odds of MetS among youth in the lowest physical activity group (< 43 min of physical activity per day) were five times greater than those in the highest physical activity group (> 103 min per day). Conversely, Pan and Pratt [33] examined the association of MetS with physical activity in 4,450 US adolescents and demonstrated that despite the tendency of a lower prevalence of MetS in active subjects, this association was not statistically significant.

In terms of cardiorespiratory fitness, the associations reported in the present study are supported by previous research. Andersen et al. [34] reported a lower VO2max in adolescents with three or more risk factors. A recent study [35] demonstrated that unfit Azorean Islands adolescents were more likely (OR, 3.414; 95% CI, 1.150-10.129) to be diagnosed with MetS when compared to the fittest adolescents.

Therefore, the evidence suggests that physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness are important indicators of the risks for developing MetS [34]. Thus, pediatric researchers have investigated how these individual lifestyle components increase the metabolic risk from childhood and adolescence to adulthood [3638].

In a review of the secular trends in variables associated with the MetS of North American youth, Eisenmann [39] showed that cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity has not changed in youth in recent decades. McMurray et al. [40] reported a high incidence of MetS in adolescents with a history of low fitness and physical activity. Steele et al. [41] suggested that physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness influence metabolic risk trough separate pathways. An important distinction between physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness is intra-individual day-to-day variability; physical activity will undoubtedly vary on a daily basis, whereas cardiorespiratory fitness will remain relatively static, taking time to change. This variability impacts the ability to measure these two variables and consequently influences their relationship with metabolic outcomes [41].

Further, it has been difficult to argue for specific levels of physical activity or fitness in children and adolescents, which could indicate an unhealthy condition [4143]. However, the optimal amounts of physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness required for preventing and treating the MetS in children and adolescents is unknown. Therefore, we propose substituting part of the sedentary time with light physical activity, then advancing to moderate-intensity, increasing goals and tailored on individual characteristics, up to an end point represented by daily moderate-to-vigorous intensity program that is sufficient to achieve normalization of the metabolic profile [4143].

The primary limitation of this study was that MetS outcomes were dependent on our definition of MetS, a problem inherent to the lack of consensus about the criteria for diagnosing MetS in a pediatric population. In addition, the cross-sectional study design does not guarantee the temporal precedence of variables and limit the extrapolation of observations. Another limitation of the study was the use of self-report instruments to measure physical activity. However, the physical activity record is considered a valid instrument for physical activity evaluation [19] and is widely used in studies involving young people [4447]. A potential factor that may indirectly influence MetS prevalence is socioeconomic status, which was not evaluated in this sample. Therefore, future studies should use socioeconomic status as a control variable when assessing the influence of physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness on risk of MetS.

Future research should also examine what is the optimal amount of physical activity needed to maximize metabolic health benefits in children and adolescents. In order to facilitate this examination, a standardization of the MetS definition should be further discussed among organizations and experts in the field. Finally, future studies should use both dichotomous and continuous scoring for MetS. In our study, continuous scoring did not result in stronger associations between physical activity and MetS. However, differences in sample size and sample characteristics may result in different associations depending on the selected approach for scoring MetS.

Conclusion

In summary, our results demonstrate that the prevalence of MetS is higher among Brazilian adolescents who are inactive and have low cardiorespiratory fitness, and there was a significant relationship between MetS and cardiorespiratory fitness. This indicates that long-term prevention strategies should be developed to increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness early in life, with the goal of promoting a physically active lifestyle.

Abbreviations

MetS: 

metabolic syndrome

HDL-C: 

high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol

BP: 

blood pressure

SBP: 

systolic blood pressure

DBP: 

diastolic blood pressure

MVPA: 

moderate to vigorous physical activity

SD: 

standard deviation

OR: 

odds ratio

95% CI: 

confidence interval of 95%

ns: 

non-significant.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Health Sciences, Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná
(2)
Deparment of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts
(3)
Departament of Pediatrics, Universidade Federal do Paraná
(4)
Departament of Physical Education, Universidade Federal do Paraná

References

  1. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III): Executive Summary of the Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, ad Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001, 285: 2486-2497. 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ford ES, Li C: Defining the metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents: Will the real definition please stand up?. J Pedriatr. 2008, 152: 160-4. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.07.056.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Alberti KGMM, Eckel SM, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, et al: Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: A Joint Statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology Prevention. Circulation. 2009, 120: 16401645-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cook S, Weitzman M, Auinger P, Nguyen M, Dietz WH: Prevalence of a metabolic syndrome phenotype in adolescents: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003, 157: 821-827. 10.1001/archpedi.157.8.821.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hitsumoto T, Makahashi M, Lizuka T, Shirai K: Relationship between metabolic syndrome and early stage coronary atherosclerosis. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2007, 14: 294-302. 10.5551/jat.E506.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Haffner SM, Valdez RA, Hazuda HP: Prospective analysis of the insulin-resistance syndrome (syndrome X). Diabetes. 1992, 41: 715-722. 10.2337/diabetes.41.6.715.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Berenson GS, Wattigney WA, Tracy R: Atherosclerosis of the aorta and coronary arteries and cardiovascular risk factors in persons 6 to 30 years and studied at necropsy (the Bogalusa Heart Study). Am J Cardiol. 1992, 70: 851-8. 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90726-F.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Erikson J, Taimela S, Koivisto VA: Exercise and the metabolic syndrome. Diabetologia. 1997, 40: 125-135. 10.1007/s001250050653.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kullo IJ, Hensrud DD, Allison TG: Relation of low cardiorespiratory fitness to the metabolic syndrome in middle-aged men. Am J Cardiol. 2002, 90: 795-797. 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02617-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson JL, Slentz CA, Houmard JA, Samsa GP, Duscha BD, Aiken LB: Exercise training amount and intensity effects on metabolic syndrome (from studies of a targeted risk reduction intervention through defined exercise). Am J Cardiol. 2007, 100: 1759-1766. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.07.027.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Malina RM: Tracking of physical activity and physical fitness across the lifespan. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1996, 67: S48-S57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen W, Srinivasan SR, Li S, Xu J, Berenson GS: Clustering of long-term trends in metabolic syndrome variables from childhood to adulthood in Blacks and Whites: The Bogalusa Hearth Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2007, 166: 527-533. 10.1093/aje/kwm105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hasselstrøm H, Hansen SE, Froberg K, Andersen LB: Physical fitness and physical activity during adolescence as predictors of cardiovascular disease risk in young adulthood. Int J Sports Med. 2002, 23: s27-31. 10.1055/s-2002-28458.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents: The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2004, 114 (2): 555-76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Duncan GE, Li SM, Zhou X: Prevalence and trends of metabolic syndrome phenotype among U.S. adolescents, 1999-2000. Diabetes Care. 2004, 27: 2438-2443. 10.2337/diacare.27.10.2438.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kranz S, Mahood LJ, Wagstaff DA: Diagnostic criteria patterns of U.S. children with metabolic syndrome: NHANES 1999-2002. Nutr J. 2007, 6: 1-9. 10.1186/1475-2891-6-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Freedman DS, Serdula MK, Srinivasan SR, Berenson G: Relation of circumferences and skinfold thicknesses to lipid and insulin concentrations in children and adolescents: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999, 69: 308-317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bouchard CA, Tremblay C, Leblanc G, Lortie R, Savard R, Theriault G: A method to assess energy expenditure in children and adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983, 37: 461-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bratteby LE, Sandhagen B, Fan H, Samuelson G: A 7-day activity diary for assessment of daily energy expenditure validated by the doubly labeled water method in adolescents. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997, 51: 585-591. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600449.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Léger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, Lambert J: The multistage 20-meter shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci. 1988, 6: 93-101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Statistical package for the social science (SPSS) version 13.0: Manual de utilização do Software. Disponível em. 2006, Acesso em maio de, [http://www.spss.com]Google Scholar
  22. Guerra S, Duarte JA, Mota J: Physical activity and cardiovascular disease risk factors in schoolchildren. Eur Physical Educ Rev. 2001, 7: 269-281. 10.1177/1356336X010073003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ribeiro JC, Guerra S, Oliveira J, Teixeira-Pinto A, Twisk JWR, Duarte JA, Mota J: Physical activity and biological risk factors clustering in pediatric population. Prev Med. 2004, 39: 596-601. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bouziotas C, Koutedakis Y, Nevill A, Ageli E, Tsigilis N, Nikolaou A, Nakou A: Greek adolescents, fitness, fat intake, activity, and coronary heart disease risk. Arch Dis Child. 2004, 89: 41-44.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Guedes DP, Guedes JERP, Barbosa DS, Oliveira JA, Stanganelli LCR: Fatores de risco cardiovasculares em adolescentes: indicadores biológicos e comportamentais. Arq Brás Cardiol. 2006, 86: 439-50. 10.1590/S0066-782X2006000600006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Weiss R, Dziura J, Burgert TS, Tamborlane WV, Taksali SE, Yechel CW, et al: Obesity and the metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2004, 350: 2362-2374. 10.1056/NEJMoa031049.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jollife CJ, Janssen I: Development of age-specific adolescent metabolic syndrome criteria that are linked to the Adult Treatment Panel III and International Diabetes Federation Criteria. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007, 49: 891-8. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.065.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Ferranti SD, Gauvreau K, Ludwig DS, Neufeld EJ, Newburger JW, Rifai N: Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in American adolescents: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Circulation. 2004, 110: 2494-2497. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000145117.40114.C7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rodrigues AN, Perez AJ, Pires JGP, Carletti L, Araújo MTM, Moyses MR, Bissoli NS, Abreu GR: Cardiovascular risk factors, their associations and presence of metabolic syndrome in adolescents. J Pediatr. 2009, 85: 55-60. 10.2223/JPED.1867.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Cavali MLR, Escrivão MAMS, Brasileiro RS, Taddei JAAC: Síndrome metabólica: comparação de critérios diagnósticos. J Pediatr. 2010, 86 (4): 325-330.Google Scholar
  31. Kelishadi REM, Gouya MM, Adeli K, Ardalan G, Gheiratmand R, Majdazadeh R, et al: Factors associated with the metabolic syndrome en a national sample of youths: CASPIAN Study. Nutrition, Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2008, 18: 461-470. 10.1016/j.numecd.2007.02.014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Nguyen THHD, Tang HK, Kelly P, Ploeg HPV, Dibley MJ: Association between physical activity and metabolic syndrome: a cross sectional survey in adolescents in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10: 1-9. 10.1186/1471-2458-10-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Pan Y, Pratt CA: Metabolic syndrome and its association with diet and physical activity in US adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008, 108: 276-286. 10.1016/j.jada.2007.10.049.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Andersen LB, Wedderkopp N, Hansen HS, Cooper AR, Froberg K: Biological cardiovascular risk factors cluster in Danish children and adolescents: the European Youth Heart Study. Prev Med. 2003, 37: 363-7. 10.1016/S0091-7435(03)00145-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Moreira C, Santos R, Vale S, Soares-Miranda L, Marques AI, Santos PC, Mota J: Metabolic syndrome and physical fitness in a sample of Azorean adolescents. Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders. 2010, 8 (5): 443-449. 10.1089/met.2010.0022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Twisk JWR, Kemper HCG, Van Mechelen W: Tracking of activity and fitness and the relationship with cardiovascular disease risk factors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000, 32: 1455-1461. 10.1097/00005768-200008000-00014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Katzmarzyk PT, Perusse L, Malina RM: Stability of indicators of the metabolic syndrome from childhood and adolescence to young adulthood: the Quebec Family Study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001, 54: 190-195. 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00315-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ferreira I, Twik JWR, Van Mechelen W, Kemper HCG, Stehouwer CDA: Current and adolescent levels of cardiopulmonary fitness are related to large artery properties at age 36: the Amsterdam growth and health longitudinal study. Eur J Clin Invest. 2002, 32: 723-731. 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2002.01066.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Eisenmann JC: Secular trends in variables associated with the metabolic syndrome of North American children and adolescents: A Review and Synthesis. Am J Human Biol. 2003, 15: 786-794. 10.1002/ajhb.10214.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. McMurray RG, Bangdiwala SI, Harrell JS, Amorim LD: Adolescents with metabolic syndrome have history of low fitness and physical activity levels. Dynamic Med. 2008, 7 (5): 1-6.Google Scholar
  41. Steele RM, Brage S, Corder K, Wareham NJ, Ekelund U: Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and the metabolic syndrome in youth. J Appl Physiol. 2008, 105: 342-351. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00072.2008.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Steinberger J, Daniels SR, Eckel RH, Hayman L, Lustig RH, Mccrindle B, Mietus-Snyder ML: Progress and challenges in metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. Circulation. 2009, 119: 628-647. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191394.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Brambilla P, Pozzobon G, Pietrobelli A: Physical activity as the main therapeutic tool for metabolic syndrome in childhood. Int J Obesity. 2011, 35: 16-28. 10.1038/ijo.2010.255.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Huang Y, Malina RM: Physical activity and correlates of estimated energy expenditure in Taiwanese adolescents 12-14 years of age. Am J Hum Biol. 1996, 8: 225-36. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(1996)8:2<225::AID-AJHB9>3.0.CO;2-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Bratteby LE, Sandhagen B, Lötborn M, Samuelson G: Daily energy expenditure and physical activity assessed by an activity diary in 374 randomly selected 15-year-old adolescents. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997, 51: 592-6. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600450.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Eisenmann JC, Katzmarzyk PT, Perusse L, Bouchard C, Malina RM: Estimated daily energy expenditure and blood lipids in adolescents: The Quebec Family Study. J Adolesc Health. 2003, 33: 147-53. 10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00059-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Guedes DP, Guedes JERP, Barbosa DS, Oliveira JA: Dispêndio energético diário e níveis de lipídeos-lipoproteínas plasmáticos em adolescentes. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2007, 13 (2): 123-128. 10.1590/S1517-86922007000200011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/674/prepub

Copyright

© Stabelini Neto et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.