A study protocol to evaluate the relationship between outdoor air pollution and pregnancy outcomes
© Ribeiro et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 25 May 2010
Accepted: 15 October 2010
Published: 15 October 2010
The present study protocol is designed to assess the relationship between outdoor air pollution and low birth weight and preterm births outcomes performing a semi-ecological analysis. Semi-ecological design studies are widely used to assess effects of air pollution in humans. In this type of analysis, health outcomes and covariates are measured in individuals and exposure assignments are usually based on air quality monitor stations. Therefore, estimating individual exposures are one of the major challenges when investigating these relationships with a semi-ecologic design.
Semi-ecologic study consisting of a retrospective cohort study with ecologic assignment of exposure is applied. Health outcomes and covariates are collected at Primary Health Care Center. Data from pregnant registry, clinical record and specific questionnaire administered orally to the mothers of children born in period 2007-2010 in Portuguese Alentejo Litoral region, are collected by the research team. Outdoor air pollution data are collected with a lichen diversity biomonitoring program, and individual pregnancy exposures are assessed with spatial geostatistical simulation, which provides the basis for uncertainty analysis of individual exposures. Awareness of outdoor air pollution uncertainty will improve validity of individual exposures assignments for further statistical analysis with multivariate regression models.
Exposure misclassification is an issue of concern in semi-ecological design. In this study, personal exposures are assigned to each pregnant using geocoded addresses data. A stochastic simulation method is applied to lichen diversity values index measured at biomonitoring survey locations, in order to assess spatial uncertainty of lichen diversity value index at each geocoded address. These methods assume a model for spatial autocorrelation of exposure and provide a distribution of exposures in each study location. We believe that variability of simulated exposure values at geocoded addresses will improve knowledge on variability of exposures, improving therefore validity of individual exposures to input in posterior statistical analysis.
During last decades, a growing number of studies concerning the relationship between outdoor air quality and its impact on pregnancy outcomes have been published , where an increasing incidence of preterm births and low birth weight among this group of population has been reported [2–4]. These outcomes have been associated to air pollutants such as ozone, particulate matter, carbon monoxide or sulfur dioxide [5–14]. Studies concerning air quality assessment in the Alentejo Litoral highlighted evidences of an association between the degradation of air quality and the industrial air pollutants emitted [15–18]. It is now important to assess if there is an association between outdoor air pollution mixtures and pregnancy outcomes, because this association is not yet investigated in the region.
Semi-ecological design studies are widely used to assess effects of air pollution in humans . In this type of analysis, health outcomes and covariates are measured in individuals and exposure assignments are usually based on air quality monitoring stations data. Therefore, estimating individual exposures are one of the major challenges when investigating these relationships with a semi-ecologic design.
To assess human exposure to outdoor air pollution in an ecological study, measurements are frequently collected from a set of known pollutants in air quality monitoring stations placed in sites previously selected for regulatory purposes. Besides the fact that these sampling sites tend to be selected for their expected relatively high concentrations, the obtained data are time series of instantaneous concentrations values measured on a continuous basis for few pollutants and are sparse in space. In this way, it is difficult to obtain data regarding the exposure to mixtures of pollutants (known and unknown) with high sampling density. In the last years, these constraints have been overcome using lichen diversity biomonitoring programs [20, 21]. Lichens (symbiotic organisms consisting of fungi and algae or cyanobacteria) are available almost everywhere on the planet, and have been used to monitor air pollution by several pollutants, particularly sulphur, nitrogen, fluoride, metals, radionuclides, dioxins, PAHs, and also particulate matter [22–26]. As they are long-lived organisms, lichens accumulate pollutants over time, reflecting a long-term exposure (from months up to several years); moreover, lichen diversity tend to decline in polluted areas, as a consequence of the harmful effects of the persistence of pollutants on the lichen physiology. Lichen diversity provides an overall measurement of the air quality, since lichens are exposed to the same complex mixture of pollutants that humans have been exposed to in the previous years. This is of critical importance for health studies, since one of the most difficult tasks is to relate the low pollution levels with medium or long-term effects on health . This was shown by the work of Cislaghi and Nimis , where lichen diversity value, used as indicator of air pollution, showed a good correlation with lung cancer mortality in north-east Italy; these authors found that the lung cancer mortality was higher in the areas where the lichen diversity was lower. Furthermore, lichen diversity biomonitoring programs allow the adoption of cost-effective sampling strategies with relatively high density of sampling locations, thus generating more spatially detailed data in order to obtain high resolution maps for outdoor pollution . These spatially detailed data are important to assess the different levels of exposure to pollution between individuals living and/or working at different areas inside the same region.
To assess uncertainty of individual exposures to outdoor air pollution, not much work have been yet published . Standard errors of estimated exposure are one way of assessing exposure uncertainty, however it is difficult if not impossible to derive by analytical methods the effect of this uncertainty on the estimated risk of an health outcome and associated confidence intervals, since the amount of uncertainty varies from location to location . Spiegelman  recommends exposure validation methods to assess uncertainty. These methods adjust exposure measurements errors collecting simultaneously data on the exposure surrogate and on a gold standard method of exposure assessment collected within a subsample of the main study population. Baxter and co-authors  also use a validation study to reduce traffic-related air pollution exposure misclassification (using indoor concentration measurements in a subset of the study population as gold standard method) to estimate the degree of misclassification and correct for it. A different approach followed in recent years is based on geostatistical simulation. Waller and Gotway  used this methodology to a case-control study on association between Very Low Birth Weight (birth weight <1500 gr) and pollution from industrial emissions, and found no significant differences between exposed and unexposed groups. This approach assumes a model for spatial autocorrelation of exposure data and uses Monte Carlo simulations to provide a distribution of exposures in each site and to determine personal variability of the exposure. The set of simulations produced have the same statistical and spatial properties as the original exposure data, which means they reproduce the spatial covariance and histogram, and they honor the observed exposure values. The use of simulations as input to further statistical analysis with multivariate regression models provides therefore a mechanism for quantifying the sensitivity of complex systems to spatial variability .
In our study we assess spatial uncertainty of individual exposures using this last approach. This method provides multiple realizations (simulations) of observed data, with reproduction of the observed histogram and spatial covariance while matching for conditioning data (observed values). Each simulation yields a unique value for each location and represents a measure of personal exposure, and the distribution of all values in each location, provides a measure of uncertainty at each location. In the end of the simulation process, we use all simulations as input for statistical analysis with multivariate logistic regression. We assess exposure parameter uncertainty using the empirical distribution of the exposure odds ratio parameters, where its mean and empirical confidence intervals are used as point and interval estimates of true odds ratio. The mean odds ratio represents the factor by which being exposed to air pollution compared to not being exposed, changes the odds of the outcome of interest (low birth weight, preterm birth).
Aim and Study Design
In this study we apply a semi-ecologic study consisting of a retrospective cohort study with ecologic assignment of exposure, to investigate the potential association between outdoor pollution and pregnancy outcomes. Health outcomes and covariates are collected at Primary Health Care Center's (PHCC's) by the research team, from pregnant registries, clinical records data and a specific questionnaire administered orally to mothers involved in this study. We collect exposure data using a lichen diversity biomonitoring program and we do data processing taking into account both lichen species richness and abundance, to achieve a lichen diversity index value (LDV) for each sample site. A spatial geostatistical modeling framework based on a sequential simulation algorithm is applied to the set of LDV values, to derive equally probable maps of lichen diversity values to be used as a surrogate for exposure to outdoor air pollution. Simulated exposures are assigned to pregnant geocoded addresses. Spatial variability of simulated realizations will improve knowledge on variability of assigned exposures, improving therefore validity of personal exposures for posterior statistical analysis with multivariate regression methods. For each simulation, we estimate parameters of logistic regression, using maximum likelihood estimator. In the end, we build an empirical distribution for odd ratio of exposure parameters, to assess a point and confidence interval estimate for odd ratio exposures.
Hypothesis of the study
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the hypothesis of an association between the levels of outdoor air pollution and the frequency of low birth weight and preterm births outcomes among Alentejo Litoral residents, in period 2007-2010. To explore this hypothesis we use a lichen diversity biomonitoring program to assess human exposure to outdoor air pollution and we apply a semi-ecological design with uncertainty assessment of exposure using a geostatistical framework.
It is mainly located in a coastal region, with several natural parks and other protected areas, and an important industrial area in Sines; this industrial pole comprises mainly petrochemical and energy related industries. A part of study region that includes Santiago do Cacém, Sines and Grândola regions has documented spatial variability of air pollution [17, 16, 33]. Air pollution seems to be generally higher near urban and industrial areas and there is a trend for better air quality with increasing distance from the sea. There is also an effect of the wind in spreading pollution originating from Sines industrial region to the South, with more disturbed areas occurring in South direction.
The study population is the group of eligible mothers living in this region that accepted to participate in this study. Mothers are eligible if they meet the following inclusion criteria: 1) Pregnant of baby born between 2007 and 2010 in Alentejo Litoral region; 2) Resident in Alentejo Litoral region during pregnancy; 3) Followed by Alentejo Litoral's PHCC's during pregnancy; 4) Singleton births; 5) Didn't use any technique to aid fertilization.
Outcome rates for low birth weight and preterm birth in the region for year 2009 are 7% and 8%, respectively. Estimated outcome rates (both low birth weight and premature birth) in pregnant exposed to lower and to upper quartile of LDV are 9% and 5%. Based on these assumptions, the study has statistical power of 80% (with significance criterion level set at 0.05) to detect 4% difference between outcome rates in pregnant exposed to lower and to upper quartile of LDV.
Outdoor air pollution data is assessed through a lichen diversity biomonitoring program.
Approximate site locations are selected in a square grid of 4 km. This spatial resolution is based in previous studies [16, 17, 21, 24] developed in the region using different approaches - LDV, accumulation of pollutants in lichens and diffusion tubes - where the sampling grid resolution has shown to be quite effective in capturing the deposition of most pollutants. The choice of the exact location is based on the following criteria: 1) location covered with Quercus suber; 2) Five trees per location (per sample); 3) the same type of landscape namely cork-oak woodlands under constant low-intensity land-use; 4) the highest possible site of the sampling point; and 5) avoidance of sites with local disturbances, particularly main roads or other facilities like farms or small factories. All these conditions are intended to minimize local biodiversity alterations due to local disturbance sources. These criteria may result in underestimation of the local-short distance pollution variability. However, we consider that the spatial resolution adopted is adequate to capture main air pollution spatial patterns.
On each Quercus suber tree trunk, a 10 by 50 cm grid with five 10 by 10 cm divisions is used and placed between 120 and 200 cm above ground, in the four main orientations (North, South, East and West). Because both harvested and un-harvested trees are sampled, the grid is always placed on virgin cork. For each orientation, species occurring inside the grid are identified and the numbers of squares in which they occur are recorded as their frequency. The following measurements are recorded for each tree: 1) sampling height (cm), 2) perimeter at breast height (cm), 3) inclination of the tree trunk (degrees), and 4) harvesting status. At each sampling site, further information is also recorded: 1) UTM position, 2) site exposure (N-W-E-S) 3) site location (flat, hill or plateau) 4) altitude (m). Identification of lichen species is mainly done in the field; for those which are not possible to identify in situ, a sample is collected for posterior identification in laboratory. All species are coded with the British Lichen Society recording code numbers .
Target population by administrative area
Estimated number of pregnants*2
Alcácer do Sal
Santiago do Cacém
In each PHCC, registered children born since 2007 are tagged. Child's mothers are invited to participate in the study, through an invitation letter with information about the study. A week later, a nurse from research team contacts the child's mother by telephone inviting her once again, to participate in the study and to schedule an appointment at the PHCC. Before questionnaire starts, oral and written information about the project is given to the mother. A written informed consent for participation in this project is asked to the mother. When mothers refuse to participate, written refusal declaration is fulfilled by the nurse.
Before questionnaire starts, mother provides her Boletim de Saúde da Grávida (BSG) - a pregnant registry, routinely updated by PHCC's staff (each time the pregnant goes to the PHCC), kept by child's mother, where data on pregnancy outcomes and other events occurred during pregnancy or events occurred during previous pregnancies, pregnant risk exposures (which includes occupational physical activity, other occupational exposures, personal exposures to tobacco in each trimester of pregnancy) and disease family history are registered. Additional information concerning maternal diet, home characteristics, night-time and day-time residence of pregnant, social condition and economic status are collected through a questionnaire designed solely for the purposes of this study.
Night and day-time addresses of mothers during pregnancy are georeferenced and gathered in a Geographic Information System (GIS), as are outdoor air pollution data. To estimate individual exposures, geographical coordinates on night-time and day-time addresses during pregnancy are linked to simulated Lichen Diversity Values. Exposure during pregnancy is a weighted average for exposure at day-time and night-time addresses, where we assume 15 hours per day spent at night-time addresses and 9 hours per day spent at day-time addresses.
Other exposure determinants assessment
Other exposure determinants
Smoking (active or passive) exposures
Residential proximity to pollution sources
Occupational exposures (physical activity and other occupational exposures)
Social condition and Economic status
Disease family history, drugs, vaccines
Complications during pregnancy
For each simulation we fit a logistic regression and we get an odds ratio for LDV exposure. From the set of all simulations we can build an empirical distribution of LDV exposure odds ratio. This enables us to 1) assess a point and a confidence interval estimate for LDV odds ratio and 2) measure how the risk of pregnancy outcome varies with simulated LDV exposures.
This is a retrospective cohort study where any eligible mother can volunteer to participate in it. Data collection relies on historical data obtained from pregnant registries and questionnaires concerning pregnant risk exposures. Therefore, participation bias is a potential concern.
To reduce possible bias sources, all non-participants are invited to state the reason (or reasons) for not participating. Data on maternal age, parity, place of residence are also collected from clinical files for each non-participant. Differences between non-participant and participant sample population are assessed in what concerns to maternal age, place of residence and parity.
The present study protocol is designed to assess the relationship between air pollution and low birth weight and preterm births outcomes performing a semi-ecological analysis. The originality of the study rest on a global indicator of air quality, the lichen diversity index value (LDV), to allow deriving a continuous metric of exposure, improving the assessment of exposure of each pregnant woman. This study will also use a stochastic method to simulate different (but equally probable) scenarios of each pregnant women exposure to outdoor air pollution, to gain insight into exposure distribution and to assess exposure uncertainty.
One of the main concerns when using lichen diversity to assess exposure of pregnant women is that lichens tend to reflect long-term air pollution (as they are slow-growing organisms) and the impact of air pollution on pregnancy outcomes is assumed to be mainly due to the exposure of women during the pregnancy period itself. However, in pollutants such as bioaccumulative compounds like Dioxins, Furans, Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs), Mercury (Hg), etc. a long-term exposure can also have a negative impact on the pregnancy outcomes, as shown by numerous studies [37–40].
When using lichen diversity to assess the human exposure we are taking benefit of several advantages of using lichens: 1) their index (LDV) reflects the integration of the pollutants over time; however it reflects with more emphasis the recent period of atmospheric deposition; 2) they integrate the biological effect of all pollutants in a synergic way, even of those pollutants that we are not able to measure nowadays, reflecting an integrated environment exposure; 3) The acute and chronic effects of pollutants are also reflected in this biological index; 4) The sampling is flexible in time and space and this allows the construction of more reliable models of air quality, with high spatial resolution to be compared with health data; 5) With those air quality models is possible to establish control areas which is difficult to obtain with any other methodology due to lack of information in space or lack of pollutants analyzed.
The main limitation in the use of lichen index in health studies is that we don't know exactly what specific period of time they are reflecting.
Lichens are very sensitive to sudden pollution episodes (they simply die); the recovery of lichen diversity from an air pollution episode is slowly due to their slow rate of growth. This slow recover does not need to be a problem for time exposure assessment, since in general, after a pollution episode, the pollutants still remain in other components of the ecosystem (soil, water, vegetation, etc.) for a given period of time affecting continuously the human food-chain.
Seasonal patterns of air pollution cannot be assessed using lichen index which might induce misclassification of exposure per trimester of pregnancy. However, in countries of south of Europe, the emission of pollutants remains constant during the seasons, unlike what happens in the north countries where in winter there is an increase of combustion sources. We think that the spatial resolution can be accurately assessed using this method since lichen index is always reflecting the worst pollution conditions independently of the season; the lichens die after the levels of pollutants reach a critical level. Thus, the same criterion is applied in all the studied territory making differences in air pollution index in space comparable.
In summary, this study is designed to assess the relationship between outdoor air pollution and pregnant outcomes performing a semi-ecological analysis. It is a contribution towards the development of new approaches in observational epidemiology because it tackles some limitations of traditional ecological studies, by using LDV index to assess personal exposure and stochastic simulation to assess personal's exposure uncertainty. At this point of the study, outdoor air pollution sample data locations are stored in a geographic information system and lichen biodiversity index are measured for 100% of samples. We found 21% of samples where LDV could not be assessed since no Quercus suber trees were available for analysis. We collected data on 628 participants and 70 non-participants. Most part of participants are from Sines (270 participants), 138 are from Grândola, 118 are from Santiago do Cacém, 57 are from Alcácer do Sal and 45 are from Odemira administrative region. The recruitment of participants will continue until April 2011, and if resources are available, until April 2012.
Ethics committee approval
The study has been approved by the Comissão Nacional de Protecção de Dados (National Committee for Protection of Personal Data). Only fully informed mothers can participate in the study. All participants receive written and oral information about the study, and are asked for their written informed consent.
We would like to thank all mothers participating in the project, and to the nurses and medical doctors for their contributions to the project. We also want to thanks for the financial support from the Regional Development and Coordinating Commission for Alentejo (CCDRA), Alentejo Regional Health Administration (ARSA), Municipality of Sines, Municipality of Santiago do Cacém, Municipality of Grândola, Municipality of Álcacer do Sal, Municipality of Odemira, School of Engineering of Technical University of Lisbon (IST-UTL), Foundation of the Faculty of Sciences of the University of Lisbon (FFCUL), Instituto Superior de Ciências do Trabalho e Empresa (ISCTE), Instituto de Estudos Superiores de Recursos Naturais (INESRE), Petróleos de Portugal, Repsol, Administração do Porto de Sines (APS), Águas de Santo André (AdSA), AICEP, CARBOGAL, Electricidade de Portugal (EDP), EuroResinas, KIMAXTRA, REN, GENERG.
- World Health Organization: Effects of air pollution on children's health and development - A review of the evidence. 2005, BonnGoogle Scholar
- Bobak M: Outdoor Air Pollution, Low Birth Weight, and Prematurity. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2000, 108 (2): 173-176. 10.2307/3454517.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wang X, Ding H, Xu X: Association between Air Pollution and Low Birth Weight: A Community-based Study. Environmental Health Perspectives. 1997, 105 (5): 514-520. 10.2307/3433580.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rogers JF, Dunlop AL: Air Pollution and Very Low Birth Weight Infants: a Target Population?. Pediatrics. 2006, 118: 156-164. 10.1542/peds.2005-2432.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ritz B, Wilhelm M, Hoggatt KJ, Ghosh JK: Ambient Air Pollution and Preterm Birth in the Environment and Pregnancy. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2007, 166 (9): 1045-1052. 10.1093/aje/kwm181.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perera F: Children are likely to suffer most from our fossil fuel addiction. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2008, 116 (8): 987-990. 10.1289/ehp.11173.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ritz B, Fei Y, Chapa G, Fruin S: Effect of Air Pollution on Preterm Birth Among Children Born in Southern California Between 1989 and 1993. Epidemiology. 2000, 11 (5): 502-511. 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sram RJ, Binkova B, Dejmek J, Bobak M: Ambient Air Pollution and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Review of the Literature. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2005, 113 (4): 10.1289/ehp.6362.
- Bobak M, Leon D: Pregnancy outcomes and outdoor air pollution: an ecological study in districts of the Czech Republic 1986-8. Occupational Environmental Medicine. 1999, 56: 539-543. 10.1136/oem.56.8.539.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ribas-Fitó N, Rámon R, Ballester F, Grimalt J, Alfredo M, Olea N, Posada M, Rebagliato M, Tardón A, Torrent M, Sunyer J: Child health and the environment: the INMA Spanish Study. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 2006, 20: 403-410. 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00745.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jedrychowski W, Bendkowska I, Flak E, Penar A, Jacek R, Kaim I, Spengler JD, Camann D, Perera FP: Estimated Risk For Altered Fetal Growth Resulting Ffrom Exposure To Fine Particles During Pregnancy: An Epidemiologic Prospective Cohort Study in Poland. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2004, 112 (14): 1398-1402. 10.1289/ehp.7065.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- McKonea TE, Ryanb PB, Özkaynakc H: Exposure information in environmental health research: Current opportunities and future directions for particulate matter, ozone, and toxic air pollutants. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology. 2009, 19: 30-44. 10.1038/jes.2008.3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jedrychowski W, Maugeri U, Jedrychowska-Bianchi I: Body Growth Rate in PreAdoslecent Children and Outdoor Air Quality. Environmental Research. 2002, 90: 12-20. 10.1006/enrs.2002.4383.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bobak M, Richards M, Wadsworth M: Relation between children's height and outdoor air pollution from coal-burning sources in the British 1946 birth cohort. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2004, 77 (6): 383-386. 10.1007/s00420-004-0522-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freitas MC: Heavy-metals in Parmelia-Sulcata collected in the neighborhood of a coal-fired power-station. Biological Trace Element Research. 1994, 43: 207-212. 10.1007/BF02917317.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pinho P, Augusto S, Branquinho C, Bio A, Pereira MJ, Soares A, Catarino F: Mapping Lichen Diversity as a First Step for Air Quality Assessment. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry. 2004, 49: 377-389. 10.1007/s10874-004-1253-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Soares A, Pereira MJ: Space-time modelling of air quality for environmental risk maps: a case study in South Portugal. Computer and Geosciences. 2007, 33: 1327-1336. 10.1016/j.cageo.2007.06.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ferreira F, Tente H, Torres P: Air Quality in Major Portuguese Urban Agglomerations. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus. 2002, 2: 5-6.Google Scholar
- Künzli N, Tager IB: The semi-individual study in air pollution epidemiology: a valid design as compared to ecologic studies. Environmental Health Perspectives. 1997, 105 (10): 1078-1083. 10.2307/3433849.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cislaghi C, Nimis P: Lichens, air pollution and lung cancer. Nature. 1997, 387: 463-464. 10.1038/387463a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Augusto S, Pereira MJ, Soares A, Branquinho C: The contribution of environmental biomonitoring with lichens to assess human exposure to dioxins. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 2007, 210: 433-438. 10.1016/j.ijheh.2007.01.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martin MH, Coughtrey PJ: Biological monitoring of heavy metal pollution. 1982, London: Applied Science PublishersView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Garty J: Lichens as biomonitors of heavy metal pollution. Plants as Biomonitors: Indicators for Heavy Metals in the Terrestrial Environment. Edited by: Markert B. 1993, Weinheim, Germany, 193-257.Google Scholar
- Augusto S, Pinho P, Branquinho C, Pereira MJ, Soares A, Catarino F: Atmospheric dioxin and furan deposition in relation to land-use and other pollutants: a survey with lichens. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry. 2004, 49: 53-65. 10.1007/s10874-004-1214-y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Augusto S, Branquinho C, Pereira MJ, Soares A, Catarino F: Dioxinas e Furanos na Peninsula de Setubal: os liquenes e os modelos geoestatisticos como instrumentos de avaliacao das areas mais contaminadas. Revista da Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa. 2004, 9: 293-304.Google Scholar
- Augusto S, Branquinho C, Pereira MJ, Soares A: Lichens as biomonitors of dioxins and furans in urban environments. Urban Air Pollution, Bioindication and Environmental Awareness. Edited by: Klumpp A, Ansel W, Klumpp G. 2009, Göttingen: Culliver Verlag, 67-79.Google Scholar
- Mukerjee D, Cleverly D: Risk from exposure to polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans emitted from municipal incinerators. Waste Management and Research. 1987, 5: 269-283.Google Scholar
- Molitor J, Jerrett M, Chang CC, Molitor NT, Gauderman J, Berhane K, McConnell R, Lurmann F, Wu J, Winer A, Thomas D: Assessing Uncertainty in Spatial Exposure Models for Air Pollution Health Effects Assessment. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2007, 115: 1147-1153. 10.1289/ehp.9849.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Waller L, Gotway C: Applied Spatial Statistics for Public Health Data. 2004, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc, full_text.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spiegelman D: Approaches to Uncertainty in Exposure Assessment in Environmental Epidemiology. Annual Review of Public Health. 2010, 31: 149-163. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103720.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Baxter L, Wright R, Paciorek C, Laden F, Suh H, Levy J: Effects of exposure measurement error in th analysis of health effects from traffic-related air pollution. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology. 2009, 20: 101-111. 10.1038/jes.2009.5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Englund E: Spatial Simulation: Environmental Applications. Environmental Modeling with GIS. Edited by: GoodChild MF. 1993, New York: Oxford University Press, 432-437.Google Scholar
- Augusto S, Máguas C, Pereira MJ, Soares A, Branquinho C: Spatial modeling of PAHs in lichens for fingerprinting of multisource atmospheric pollution. Environmental Science and Technology. 2009, 43: 7762-7769. 10.1021/es901024w.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asta J, Erhardt W, Ferreti M, Fornasier F, Kirschbaum U, Nimis PL, Purvis OW, Pirintsos S, Scheidegger C, Van Haluwyn C, Wirth V: Mapping lichen diversity as an indicator of environmental quality. Monitoring with Lichens-Monitoring Lichens. Edited by: Nimis PL, Scheidegger C, Wolseley P. 2002, Dorderecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 273-279.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Coppins BJ: Checklist of Lichens of Great Britain and Ireland. 2002, London: British Lichen SocietyGoogle Scholar
- Soares A: Direct Sequential Simulation and Cosimulation. Mathematical Geology. 2001, 33: 911-926. 10.1023/A:1012246006212.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dolk H, Vrijheid M: The impact of environmental pollution on congenital anomalies. British Medical Bulletin. 2003, 68: 25-45. 10.1093/bmb/ldg024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dolk H: Epidemiological approaches to identifying environmental causes of birth defects. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C. 2004, 125C: 4-11. 10.1002/ajmg.c.30000.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ngo AD, Taylor R, Roberts CL, Nguyen TV: Association between Agent Orange and birth defects: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Epidemiology. 2006, 35: 1220-1230. 10.1093/ije/dyl038.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kondo K: Congenital Minamata Disease: warnings from Japan's experience. Journal of Child Neurology. 2000, 15: 458-464. 10.1177/088307380001500707.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/613/prepub