Is Leishmaniasis adequately notified in Sri Lanka? A survey among doctors from high endemic district of Sri Lanka.

Background: Leishmaniasis is a notifiable disease in Sri Lanka since 2008. Previous studies show a gap in the notification of leishmaniasis. Purpose of the present study was to determine the Knowledge, attitudes and practice of medical officers regarding leishmaniasis. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Anuradhapura district which reported the highest prevalence of leishmaniasis. Medical officers from public and private health care institutes in the area filled a self-administered questionnaire in the presence of the investigators. Results: One hundred and eighty-eight (188) medical officers completed the questionnaire. Of them, 95.7% were aware of leishmaniasis as a parasitic infection and 84.7% correctly identified Leishmania donovani as the causative organism in Sri Lanka. From the respondents, 181 (96.8%) knew that the vector of leishmaniasis is sandfly. Cutaneous leishmaniasis was reported as the most prevalent form of leishmaniasis in the country by 176 (94.1%). Nearly half of the respondents (98, 54.1%) was aware of the fact that the Anuradhapura district has the highest prevalence of the disease. Many of them had the idea that leishmaniasis is an emerging disease (155, 84.3%,) and early diagnosis is important in controlling the disease (163, 89.1%). Although about three fourth (123, 73.7 %,) of the participants mentioned that leishmaniasis should be notified at first clinical suspicion, only 74 (42.5%) were aware that it is a legal requirement. Some medical officers (39, 22%) believed that the current notification system in the country is not effective. Unavailability of notification forms (60, 36.8%) heavy workload (85, 50.3%) and inadequate supportive staff (55, 35.1%) were reported as barriers for timely notification. Even though 105 (58.0%) of medical officers had suspected leishmaniasis during last eight years period only 35 (19.4%) had notified. Conclusions: Even though more than 90% of the participants had good theoretical knowledge about leishmaniasis; notification of leishmaniasis is considerably inadequate. This study emphasizes the need for greater efforts to a their knowledge, attitudes, and practices on leishmaniasis its


Introduction
Leishmaniasis is an emerging but neglected parasitic disease caused by species of genus Leishmania which is transmitted during the bite of an infected phlebotomine sandfly. It is known to manifest in 3 main forms; cutaneous leishmaniasis, mucocutaneous leishmaniasis and visceral leishmaniasis in humans (1). About twenty species or subspecies have been identified in relation to leishmaniasis in human. Cutaneous leishmaniasis is usually caused by Leishmania tropica and Leishmania major; Leishmania braziliensis and Leishmania panamensis are responsible for mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. Visceral leishmaniasis is a result of Leishmania donovani and Leishmania infantum infections (2). Inside the reticuloendothelial system of infected individuals, organisms multiply and liberate amastigotes into the blood. These amastigotes enter into the sandfly's gut during a bite and multiply into promastigotes which can be transmitted into a new host (3).
Cutaneous leishmaniasis is characterized by single or multiple crusted painless papules usually found in exposed areas of the body. Extensive mid facial destruction, tissue overgrowth obstructing the nares, septal granulation and gingivitis are features of mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. Kala-azar or Visceral leishmaniasis causes a systemic illness with fever, weight loss, hepatosplenomegaly and pancytopenia (4). While visceral leishmaniasis is the most fatal form of the disease, cutaneous leishmaniasis has been identified as the most prevalent form (5).
Diagnosis of leishmaniasis is mainly clinical; this can be confirmed by isolating the parasite in the skin smears or biopsies taken from the lesions. Detection of antibodies to recombinant rK 39 antigen in patients serum and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays can also be used in diagnostic purposes (1,6). Intralesional, Intramuscular or Intravenous Sodium stibogluconate (SSG) injections and Cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen are the main treatment modalities for leishmaniasis (6).
Nevertheless, cutaneous leishmaniasis may heal even without treatment. Applying repellents on the exposed body areas, usage of insecticide -treated bed nets and wearing long-sleeved dresses when staying outdoor are some of the measures to prevent the bite of a sandfly. Identifying infected patients and early treatment is of greater importance in ceasing the spread of the disease.
Epidemiology of the leishmaniasis depends on several factors related to the life cycle of the parasite, human behavior, and climate. The tropical climate facilitates the breeding of sand flies. Traveling to endemic countries and urbanization invading forest lands increase the chance of humans getting bitten by vectors. Poor socio-economical status increases the risk of leishmaniasis. Malnutrition compromises the immunity aggravating the self-limiting disease into full-blown systemic illness. Poor housing and sanitary conditions (such as a lack of waste management or open sewerage) may increase sand fly breeding and resting sites, as well as their access to humans. Crowded houses attract sand flies providing good sources for their blood-meals. Human behaviors, such as sleeping outside or on the ground, may increase the risk of sandfly bites (3,7).
Around 0.7 to 1 million new cases are diagnosed every year in the world (7). Disease affected regions include Africa, America, the East Mediterranean region, Europe and South-East Asia (5). Annual death count due to leishmaniasis is 26 000 to 65 000 across the globe (7). Leishmaniasis is a notifiable disease in Sri Lanka since 2008 (8). Cutaneous leishmaniasis is the most prevalent form of the disease found in Sri Lanka and the causative organism has been identified as Leishmania donovani, the organism which is mainly responsible for visceral leishmaniasis in the globe (9). The disease is highly endemic in the North Central province of the country which is a semi-urban area with a tropical climate. According to the latest annual health bulletin published by the ministry of health Sri Lanka, Anuradhapura had been reported as the second-highest rate per district; 22% (277 cases) out of all the reported cases (10). But at the time of data collection highest incident rate was from Anuradhapura district for six consecutive years from 2010 to 2015 (11).
Disease control and the notification go hand in hand. Contact tracing process and remedial measures to control the spread of the disease are taken once notifications reach the MOH (a health unit headed by Medical Officers of Health) office. The medical officers at the MOH office sends public health inspectors to trace contacts and refer them for investigations. Untreated patients are the main sources of disease spread in the community. Hence it is evident failure to notify is "opening the gate" for disease spread.
Though it is a notifiable disease and notification is a legal requirement; there are evidences for gap between actual figures and the number of cases reported. According to a survey done in Mulathiv district of the northern province between 2011 and 2013, more than 200 cases of Leishmaniasis among military recruits had been missed from the national disease surveillance reports (12). This suggests that there is a problem in the notification system of the country. Under-reporting has been identified as a major issue associated with disease notification in low and middle-income countries. In a study done among Sri Lankan medical officers, it was shown only a few doctors had notified though their awareness of notifiable diseases was good (13). Lack of time, belief of notification forms do not reach the MOH office and belief of no actions will be taken were among the reasons for notification failure (13). Except for these issues lack of clear instructions regarding notifications, unfamiliarity with the reporting system, infrastructure issues such as inadequate human resources and consideration of patient confidentiality were reported as barriers of notification in studies done in other countries (14)(15)(16)(17)(18).
Knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) of medical officers play an important role in infectious disease control in any setting. Knowledge about the disease is vital in making the right diagnosis, carrying out the relevant investigations and treating the patients. Good attitudes together with good practices such as timely notification to the relevant authorities would ensure effective control of the disease before growing into pandemic. Doctors play a vital role in educating the public on health issues. If doctors' knowledge is deficient, public awareness inevitably becomes low. In the case of Leishmaniasis, as the skin nodules are painless, poor public awareness increases the chance of late presentation to healthcare with complications. However, there is no published data on studies done in the country regarding knowledge, attitude, and practices of medical officers related to leishmaniasis or disease notification. Knowing the KAP of medical officers related to leishmaniasis helps to identify the obstacles in controlling the disease such as under-notification and carrying out remedial measures. The main objective of this study was to assess the Knowledge, attitude, and practices of medical officers about leishmaniasis in an MOH area in Anuradhapura district.

Study area and design
A cross-sectional study was carried out in Nuwaragampalatha East MOH. This MOH area was selected as it caters to the highest number of doctors per MOH area in the Anuradhapura district. The estimated population of this MOH area is 75,326. Anuradhapura district is in the dry zone of the country which has a tropical climate with usual temperature ranging from 20 -35 o C . Except in the town area the rest of the land has good forest cover parts of which have now been converted to cultivation fields called "chena". Paddy cultivation and chena cultivation are the main modes of income of the people living in the rural areas of Anuradhapura district. These cultivations mainly depend on monsoon rain which falls between December to February.

Sample size and sampling techniques
The sample size was calculated using the n = Z 2 P (1-P)/d 2 (a WHO-recommended statistical formula for health studies) where n = number of study subjects (medical officers) enrolled in the study, Z = test statistic which allows calculating result with 95% confidence (1.96), P = expected proportion in the population-based on previous studies, (as this was unknown we kept p = 0.5 and d = absolute error or precision as 8% (for 50% prevalence). n = 150. All the medical officers (334)  Other health care workers were excluded from the study as they are not directly involved in diagnosing and notifying the disease.

Data collection
The data was collected during May 2016 to February 2017 using a self-administered, structured questionnaire developed by the investigators based on the "Leishmaniasis fact sheet" published by the world health organization (WHO) and "surveillance case definitions for notifiable diseases in Sri Lanka" booklet published by epidemiology unit, Sri Lanka (7) (19). Investigators visited the medical officers at their working units and got the questionnaires filled by them in the presence of investigators. All participants provided informed written consent before filling the questionnaire. It took about fifteen minutes to fill the questionnaire by the respondents.
The questionnaire was comprised of four parts. Part A related to study subjects socio-demographic details, Part B on knowledge regarding leishmaniasis and notification, Part C on attitude towards leishmaniasis and notification and Part D on practice related to leishmaniasis and notification.
Knowledge was assessed using a 15-item questionnaire. Disease prevalence, causative organisms, mode of transmission and vector, clinical features and treatment methods were assessed under this section. Attitudes were assessed using a 7-item questionnaire and the section on practice had 8 items. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the ethics review committee of the faculty of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajarata University, Sri Lanka.

Data management and analysis
Data were double entered and analyzed using SPSS-21 statistical software. Descriptive statistics were used to explain the characteristics of the sample such as age, sex and service experience. Multiple linear regression model was applied to analyze the effects of predictor variables on the scores. The frequency distributions were calculated to analyze the rest of the components.

Results
One hundred and eighty-eight (188)  Although about three fourth (123, 73.7 %,) of the participants mentioned that leishmaniasis should be notified at first clinical suspicion, only 42.5% (74) were aware that it is a legal requirement under the court of law in Sri Lanka. One hundred and fifty-two participants (84%) reported that all medical officers can notify the disease. Only forty-three (28.9%) medical officers knew the correct notification chain. Table 2 shows respondents' attitudes regarding leishmaniasis and notification system.

Discussion
Leishmaniasis has now been identified as an emerging disease in Sri Lanka (20). Emphasizing the need for controlling this disease Ministry of health, Sri Lanka declared it as a notifiable disease in 2008 (8). This study was conducted in a sample of medical officers from a leishmaniasis high endemic district of Sri Lanka regarding their knowledge, attitudes, and practices on leishmaniasis and its notification. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to investigate this issue in the Sri Lankan doctors' community. According to our study, nearly 90% of physicians had good knowledge about the causative organism and disease transmission. Almost all the participants correctly identified the vector of Leishmaniasis as the sandfly. Most of the respondents knew about clinical features and treatment methods of Leishmaniasis. But only 17% were aware that cutaneous leishmaniasis can be cured even without treatment. The practice of treating all the diagnosed patients of leishmaniasis may be the reason for this significantly low rate.
Although most of the participants had the idea that Leishmaniasis is an emerging disease in the country; just above half of the sample knew that the highest prevalence of the disease is from Anuradhapura district (the area in which they serve). This may be due to inadequate attention to publications of health ministry; weekly epidemiological reports and annual health bulletins that are available online, which gives updates regarding disease prevalence. It would be beneficial to establish a network among medical officers of the country through text messages or e-mails to keep them updated regarding infectious disease outbreaks. Such a system can even be useful in crisis situations as well.
In line with other studies regarding disease notification, there was no consensus among the responded doctors regarding the responsibility of filling the notification form and to whom a filled notification form should be handed over. Only one-fifth of medical officers who suspected leishmaniasis had notified. This trend for leishmaniasis under-reporting was observed in other countries as well (21,22). Low rate of awareness on proper notification chain and the fact that disease notification is a legal requirement (as pointed out in the study findings) should be some of the factors responsible for this low notification rate. Several other studies have reported obstacles for disease notification similar to our findings such as infrastructure issues and lack of human resources (14,(23)(24)(25), lack of time (14)(15)(16)23) and lack of reporting forms/registers (15,26). These barriers were noted in the notification of other diseases like tuberculosis, malaria, and influenza as well (17,23,27,28).
Notified data guides in distributing resources, monitoring and controlling the disease. Under notification and suboptimal attitudes regarding Leishmaniasis notification, can conceal the true disease burden and mislead the whole surveillance system. Notification switches on the contact tracing process and active case detection. Hence disease control is impossible to accomplish without proper notification.
The study confronted several limitations. Our sample was from one MOH area (and the majority of the participants are from one major tertiary care center) which can influence the external validity of the result. Although the room for acquiescence, habituation and sponsor bias was minimal, the possibility of over-reporting (social desirability bias) could not be excluded as there was no way of crosschecking what was reported is actually done. Despite all these limitations, we believe our findings provide a valuable source of information for policymakers. Estimation of under-reporting of other notifiable diseases is an important aspect that should be investigated in future researches.

Conclusion
Even though more than 90% of medical officers participated in this study had good theoretical knowledge about leishmaniasis, notification of leishmaniasis is considerably inadequate though the study population is from an area with high disease prevalence. The findings of the study emphasize the need for regular awareness/training programs on notification chain and notifiable diseases. These programs can be incorporated into continuous medical education (CME) lecturers conducted in major hospitals. Establishing an electronic system (Eg: e-mail, online form system) for disease notification will enhance timely notification of all notifiable diseases while making a path to overcome some of the barriers of inadequate human resources and infrastructure. Responsible officials and policymakers should take necessary actions to modify and monitor the notification system to control and eliminate leishmaniasis form Sri Lanka.

Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the ethics review committee of the faculty of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajarata University, Sri Lanka.
All participant gave written consent for participation. Consent for publication: Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials: The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests: None
Funding: This is a self-funded research.
Authors' contributions: All authors contributed to designing the study and writing the proposal. CH, authors read and approved the final manuscript.