Skip to main content

Table 5 Multivariable logistic regression model showing the odds ratios, Millennium Cohort Study, UK 2000–2018 (n = 1,271)

From: Risk factors of persistent adolescent thinness: findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study

Cohort Member Characteristics

Persistent Adolescent Thinness

Males

OR (95% CI)

Females

OR (95% CI)

Ethnicity

White

1

1

South Asian

1.26 (0.32, 4.94)

1.25 (0.26, 5.98)

Black & Other

4.69 (0.95, 23.1)

0.55 (0.09, 3.32)

Maternal BMI

Healthy weight

1

1

Underweight

3.44 (1.13, 10.5)*

1.57 (0.32, 7.66)

Overweight/Obese

0.38 (0.14, 1.06)

0.56 (0.15, 2.13)

Paternal BMI a

Healthy Weight

1

1

Underweight

22.2 (2.35, 209.6)**

-

Overweight/Obese

0.73 (0.32, 1.67)

0.20 (0.07, 0.56)**

Birthweight

Healthy birthweight

1

1

Low birthweight

0.31 (0.07, 1.41)

4.13 (0.77, 22.0)

High birthweight

0.75(0.19, 2.95)

0.82 (0.14, 4.72)

Breastfeeding

Breastfed less than 3 months

1

1

Breastfed for over 3 months

0.91 (0.41, 2.03)

1.36 (0.53, 3.52)

Planned Pregnancy

Planning to get pregnant

1

1

Pregnancy was a surprise

2.49 (1.11, 5.57)*

0.46 (0.14, 1.56)

Maternal Education

NVQ Level 4 & 5

1

1

NVQ Level 3

1.26 (0.38, 4.13)

0.19 (0.02, 0.53)

NVQ Level 2

1.30 (0.50, 3.38)

0.48(0.14, 1.60)

NVQ Level 1

1.11 (0.19, 6.37)

0.31 (0.04, 2.22)

No educational qualification

1.34 (0.29, 6.26)

0.05 (0.00, 065)*

Income

Highest quintile

1

1

Fourth quintile

0.96 (0.25, 3.67)

4.09 (0.95, 17.5)

Third quintile

0.61 (0.16, 2.39)

4.63 (0.95, 22.6)

Second quintile

0.60 (0.13, 2.84)

0.33 (0.05, 2.29)

Lowest quintile

3.25 (1.06, 9.91)

11.4 (0.90, 142.7)

Self-esteem

Healthy self-esteem

1

1

Low self-esteem

6.57 (1.46, 29.7)*

3.02 (0.81, 11.3)

Physical Activity

Met Recommended Physical Activity Levels

1

1

Below Recommended Physical Activity Levels

1.13 (0.52, 2.72)

4.22 (1.82, 9.75)**

  1. The multivariable logistic regression model, mutually adjusted for all risk factors, shows the odds ratio of persistent adolescent thinness compared with persistent healthy weight among participants at ages 11, 14 and 17
  2. OR Odds ratio
  3. CI Confidence Interval
  4. * p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
  5. aUnderweight Paternal BMI predicts failure perfectly for persistent thinness in adolescent females, and has therefore been omitted