Skip to main content

Table 5 HRs and 95% CIs of incident eGFR decline ≥ 40% according to each unit increase in FPG variability measures in Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

From: The association between fasting plasma glucose variability and incident eGFR decline: evidence from two cohort studies

Variability measures

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

HR (95% CI)

P value

HR (95% CI)

P value

HR (95% CI)

P value

HR (95% CI)

P value

SD

 With diabetes

1.01(1.01–1.02)

0.001

1.01(1.00–1.02)

0.040

1.01(1.01–1.02)

0.002

1.01 (1.00–1.02)

0.042

 Without diabetes

1.03(0.94–1.12)

0.516

1.02(0.94–1.11)

0.615

1.01(0.93–1.10)

0.762

1.01(0.93–1.10)

0.790

CV

 With diabetes

1.02 (1.01–1.04)

0.008

1.02(1.00–1.03)

0.067

1.02(1.00–1.03)

0.020

1.02 (1.00–1.03)

0.041

 Without diabetes

1.02(0.94–1.10)

0.635

1.02(0.94–1.10)

0.631

1.01(0. 93–1.09)

0.797

1.01(0.93–1.09)

0.799

ARV

 With diabetes

1.01(1.00–1.01)

0.006

1.01(1.00–1.01)

0.026

1.01(1.00–1.01)

0.007

1.01 (1.00–1.01)

0.087

 Without diabetes

1.00(0.94–1.07)

0.889

1.00(0.94–1.07)

0.990

0.99(0.93–1.06)

0.827

0.99(0.93–1.06)

0.794

VIM

 With diabetes

1.01(1.00–1.02)

0.052

1.00(1.01–1.02)

0.119

1.01(1.00–1.02)

0.144

1.01(1.00–1.02)

0.055

 Without diabetes

1.02(0.93–1.11)

0.656

1.02(0.93–1.12)

0.633

1.01(0.93–1.10)

0.803

1.01(0.93–1.10)

0.799

  1. Model 1: adjusted for age and sex at baseline (phase 2)
  2. Model 2: Model 1 + marital status, education, ever smoking, prevalent CVD, physical activity, anti-diabetic drug use, anti-hypertensive drug, lipid-lowering drug, BMI, WC, SBP, DBP, eGFR, and FPG at baseline (phase 2)
  3. Model 3: Model 1 + marital status, education, ever smoking, prevalent CVD, and physical activity at baseline (phase 2), and anti-diabetic drug use, anti-hypertensive drug, and lipid-lowering drug over phases 2–4, and average BMI, WC, SBP, DBP, and eGFR over phases 2–4
  4. Model 4: Model 3 + average FPG