Skip to main content

Table 4 Tests for SES-by-school neighborhood interactions on WHR for girls(Ref: M&S families)1

From: Childhood obesity inequality in northeast China: joint effect of social economic status and school neighborhood environment

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

Model 5

 

Coef

95%CI

Coef

95%CI

Coef

95%CI

Coef

95%CI

Coef

95%CI

SES group

          

Poor families

-0.37

-0.60, -0.13

-0.11

-0.36, 0.15

-0.09

-0.32, 0.13

-0.49

-0.75, -0.22

-0.07

-0.28, 0.13

M&L families

-0.37

-0.62, -0.11

-0.06

-0.34, 0.21

-0.07

-0.33, 0.18

-0.51

-0.80, -0.23

-0.07

-0.30, 0.15

M&P families

-0.42

-0.71, -0.14

-0.14

-0.43, 0.15

-0.10

-0.38, 0.17

-0.42

-0.75, -0.10

-0.14

-0.37, 0.10

R&S families

-0.41

-0.68, -0.14

-0.02

-0.32, 0.27

-0.05

-0.32, 0.22

-0.43

-0.73, -0.13

-0.07

-0.31, 0.16

R&H families

-0.43

-0.76, -0.09

-0.17

-0.51, 0.17

-0.11

-0.45, 0.22

-0.54

-0.92, -0.16

-0.18

-0.46, 0.11

Number of supermarkets

-0.45

-0.76, -0.15

        

Number of vegetable stores

  

0.09

-0.02, 0.20

      

Number of convenience stores

    

0.02

0.00, 0.03

    

Number of residential sites

      

-0.01

-0.03, 0.00

  

Number of public transport stops

        

0.23

0.15, 0.31

Number of supermarkets* Poor families

0.31

-0.03, 0.66

        

Number of supermarkets* M&L families

0.31

-0.08, 0.70

        

Number of supermarkets* M&P families

0.33

-0.05, 0.71

        

Number of supermarkets* R&S families

0.40

0.00, 0.79

        

Number of supermarkets* R&H families

0.30

-0.17, 0.78

        

Number of vegetable stores * Poor families

  

-0.10

-0.24, 0.04

      

Number of vegetable stores * M&L families

  

-0.12

-0.26, 0.01

      

Number of vegetable stores * M&P families

  

-0.12

-0.26, 0.02

      

Number of vegetable stores * R&S families

  

-0.18

-0.33, -0.03

      

Number of vegetable stores * R&H families

  

-0.11

-0.28, 0.06

      

Number of convenience stores * Poor families

    

-0.02

-0.04, 0

    

Number of convenience stores * M&L families

    

-0.02

-0.04, 0

    

Number of convenience stores * M&P families

    

-0.03

-0.05, -0.01

    

Number of convenience stores * R&S families

    

-0.03

-0.05, -0.01

    

Number of convenience stores * R&H families

    

-0.03

-0.05, 0

    

Number of residential sites * Poor families

      

0.01

0.00, 0.03

  

Number of residential sites * M&L families

      

0.02

0.01, 0.04

  

Number of residential sites * M&P families

      

0.01

-0.01, 0.02

  

Number of residential sites * R&S families

      

0.01

-0.01, 0.03

  

Number of residential sites * R&H families

      

0.02

0.00, 0.03

  

Number of public transport stops * Poor families

        

-0.23

-0.32, -0.13

Number of public transport stops * M&L families

        

-0.22

-0.32, -0.12

Number of public transport stops * M&P families

        

-0.24

-0.34, -0.13

Number of public transport stops * R&S families

        

-0.24

-0.33, -0.14

Number of public transport stops * R&H families

        

-0.21

-0.32, -0.11

Constant

0.43

0.19, 0.67

0.12

-0.13, 0.38

0.11

-0.12, 0.35

0.48

-1.56, 2.51

0.06

-0.15, 0.28

  1. 1Adjusted for age, and onset of puberty (initiation of menstrual periods for girls, appearance of voice change, facial hair, or increase in size of Adam’s apple for boys)
  2. Model 1: tested the effect modification between the number of supermarkets across SES groups in reference to M&S families. The model was specified as follows: SES group, number of supermarkets, number of supermarkets*SES group
  3. Model 2: tested the effect modification between the number of vegetable stores across SES groups in reference to M&S families. The model was specified as follows: SES group, number of vegetable stores, number of vegetable stores*SES group
  4. Model 3: tested the effect modification between the number of convenient stores across SES groups in reference to M&S families. The model was specified as follows: SES group, number of convenient stores, number of convenient stores*SES group
  5. Model 4: tested the effect modification between the number of residential sites across SES groups in reference to M&S families. The model was specified as follows: SES group, number of residential sites, number of residential sites*SES group
  6. Model 5: tested the effect modification between the number of public transport stops across SES groups in reference to M&S families. The model was specified as follows: SES group, number of public transport stops, number of public transport stops *SES group