Skip to main content

Table 4 Certainty in evidence (GRADE) for screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT)

From: Which interventions for alcohol use should be included in a universal healthcare benefit package? An umbrella review of targeted interventions to address harmful drinking and dependence

  

Hazardous/harmful alcohol use

AUD

Screening and brief intervention

Brief motivational interviewing

Brief counselling

Social norms

Brief intervention (BI)

BI with another intervention

Risk of bias

Meta-analyses (AMSTAR)

Low

Very low

Very low

Moderate

Very low

Low

RCTs

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

NR

NR

Inconsistency

Meta-analyses

Inconsistent (but most showed a significant effect)

Very inconsistent

Mostly consistent

Consistent

Consistent

NA (single study)

Heterogeneity of RCTs

Very high

Very high

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

High

Indirectness

Applicable

1/3 studies on young people

1/3 studies on non-physicians

Students only

No consumption outcomes

Applicable

Imprecision

Confidence interval

Variable

Variable

Small

Small

Very wide

Very wide

Sample size

Thousands

Thousands

Thousands

Thousands

Thousands

Thousands for NMA

Small study effect (number of studies)

Yes (2), No (1), NR (7)

No (1), NR (2)

Yes (1), No (1), NR (1)

Yes (2)

Yes (2)

Yes (1)

Other

Small effect size, long timeframe

NA

NA

Shorter timeframe

NA

NA

Overall

Low

Very low

Very low

Very low

Very low

Very low

  1. AUD Alcohol use disorder, NA Not applicable, NMA Network meta-analysis, NR Not reported, RCT Randomised controlled trial