From: ‘We are not the ones to blame’. Gamblers’ and providers’ appraisal of self-exclusion in Germany
Categories | |||
---|---|---|---|
Early Recognition/Active Addressing (category I) | Length and Revocation (category II) | ||
Core categories | |||
Gamblers | Governmental providers | Commercial providers | |
Self-exclusion has benefits, but there are limitations | The underlying idea of self-exclusion is positive, but it does not work | If SE worked as intended, it would be an appropriate measure as people with gambling problems should be prevented from gambling |