Skip to main content

Table 1 Quality Assessment of Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies Using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist

From: Physical activity and psychological adjustment among retirees: a systematic review

Source

JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cross-sectional

D1

D2

D3

D4

D5

D6

D7

D8

Total Score

Bailey & McLaren 2005 [7]

U

Y

Y

U

U

Y

Y

Y

5

Bevil et al. 1994 [46]

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

Y

Y

Y

7

Brien 1981 [50]

Y

Y

U

Y

U

U

Y

Y

5

Conde-Sala et al. 2017 [44]

U

Y

U

U

Y

Y

Y

Y

5

Earl et al. 2015 [14]

Y

Y

Y

U

U

Y

Y

Y

6

Fly et al. 1981 [54]

Y

Y

U

Y

Y

U

Y

Y

6

Fry & ghosh 1980 [39]

Y

Y

N

U

U

U

N

Y

3

Krahe 2011 [49]

Y

Y

U

Y

Y

Y

U

Y

6

Kuvaja-Köllner et al. 2013 [8]

U

Y

Y

U

U

Y

Y

Y

5

Lee & Hung 2011 [20]

Y

Y

Y

U

U

Y

Y

Y

6

Morgan et al. 1991 [53]

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

U

Y

Y

6

Nimrod & Adoni 2006 [24]

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

U

Y

Y

6

Nimrod 2007 [23]

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

U

Y

Y

6

Nimrod et al. 2008 [52]

Y

Y

U

Y

U

U

Y

Y

5

Oakley & Pratt 1997 [47]

U

Y

Y

U

U

Y

Y

Y

5

Rakhshani et al. 2014 [15]

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

Y

Y

Y

7

Read et al. 2013 [40]

U

Y

Y

U

N

U

Y

Y

4

Reddick & stewart 1994 [48]

Y

Y

U

Y

U

Y

U

Y

5

Russell 1987 [51]

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

U

Y

Y

6

Sener et al. 2007 [43]

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

8

Walsh et al. 2019 [9]

Y

Y

Y

Y

U

U

Y

Y

6

  1. Y  Yes, U  Unclear, N  NO
  2. D1: Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? D2: Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? D3: Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? D4: Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? D5: Were confounding factors identified? D6: Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? D7: Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? D8: Was appropriate statistical analysis used?