Skip to main content

Table 3 Health-compromising behaviors by energy drink consumption: adjusted odds ratios (aOR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and corresponding relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI)a

From: Associations between adolescents’ energy drink consumption frequency and several negative health indicators

  

Inadequate tooth brushingb

Skipping breakfastb

Low physical activityc

Short sleepd

Problematic social media useb

Current smokinge

Alcohol consumptionf

Drunkennessb

Current snus useb

Cannabis useb

Energy drinks

 No  consumption

 

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 Infrequent consumption

aOR 95% CI

P-value

1.22 [0.94–1.58]

0.139

1.24 [0.89–1.72]

0.196

0.70 [0.50–0.99]

0.045

1.62 [1.24–2.12]

 < 0.001

2.23 [1.40–3.56]

0.001

3.15 [1.56–6.37]

0.002

2.28 [1.63–3.18]

 < 0.001

1.39 [0.85–2.28]

0.187

2.63 [1.27–5.43]

0.009

2.59 [1.22–5.49]

0.014

 

RR 95% CI

1.15

1.20

0.73

1.49

2.07

3.03

1.97

1.33

2.51

2.48

  

[0.96–1.36]

[0.91–1.55]

[0.54–0.99]

[1.20–1.83]

[1.37–3.08]

[1.54–5.78]

[1.51–2.51]

[0.87–1.97]

[1.26–4.79]

[1.21–4.86]

 Frequent consumption

aOR 95% CI

P-value

1.44 [1.07–1.94]

0.016

2.22 [1.66–2.99]

 < 0.001

0.83 [0.55–1.26]

0.373

2.60 [1.91–3.54]

 < 0.001

2.81 [1.76–4.51]

 < 0.001

11.89 [6.25–22.59]

 < 0.001

4.34 [3.14–5.99]

 < 0.001

1.74 [1.13–2.70]

0.013

3.94 [1.85–8.37]

 < 0.001

3.68 [1.73–7.80]

0.001

 

RR 95% CI

1.28

1.87

0.85

2.12

2.53

9.85

3.08

1.59

3.62

3.42

  

[1.05–1.54]

[1.51–2.29]

[0.59–1.21]

[1.69–2.60]

[1.68–3.72]

[5.68–16.02]

[2.49–3.71]

[1.11–2.23]

[1.80–6.85]

[1.69–6.52]

Infrequent vs. Frequentg

P-value

0.562

0.003

0.803

0.005

0.408

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

0.642

0.456

0.619

  1. Interaction was found in the models for short sleep and alcohol consumption: adjusted effect presented. The interaction effect is presented in the Additional file 3: Table S7
  2. aRelative risks and their confidence intervals were derived from adjusted odds ratios
  3. bModels were adjusted for age, gender, family affluence, short sleep, low physical activity, current smoking, alcohol consumption, and multiple health complaints
  4. cModel was adjusted for age, gender, family affluence, short sleep, current smoking, alcohol consumption, and multiple health complaints
  5. dModel was adjusted for age, gender, family affluence, low physical activity, current smoking, alcohol consumption, and multiple health complaints
  6. eModel was adjusted for age, gender, family affluence, short sleep, low physical activity, alcohol consumption, and multiple health complaints
  7. fModel was adjusted for age, gender, family affluence, short sleep, low physical activity, current smoking, and multiple health complaints
  8. gTested with pairwise multiple comparisons