Skip to main content

Table 2 Critical appraisal for included cross-sectional studies

From: Association between public health emergencies and sexual and reproductive health, gender-based violence, and early marriage among adolescent girls: a rapid review

Study

Sampling

Participants

Exposure

Condition

Confounding

Measures

Analysis

Augusti et al. [42]

x

x

x

x

 

x

x

Cerna-Turoff et al. [40]

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

Oliveira et al. [46]

x

x

x

x

 

x

x

Epstein et al. [41]

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

Karp et al. [43]

x

x

x

x

 

x

x

Kerekes et al. [44]

x

x

x

x

 

x

x

Sloand et al. [39]

x

x

x

x

 

x

x

Temple et al. [38]

x

x

x

x

  

x

Zulaika et al. [37]

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

  1. The coding is based on the Joanna Briggs Institute tool for the appraisal of cross-sectional quantitative studies. The two categories on “Were confounding factors identified?” and “Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated?” were collapsed into one column and are marked with “x” if reported in the respective study