Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Association between public health emergencies and sexual and reproductive health, gender-based violence, and early marriage among adolescent girls: a rapid review

Study ID

Country

Study design

Study quality

Duration

Population age (years)

Sample size (females)

PHE

Outcome

Mechanisms underlying the effect of PHE on outcomes

Rashid and Michaud [36]

Bangladesh

Qualitative design using face-to-face in-depth interviews and informal discussions

Some concerns

1998

15–19

9

Flood

Sexual and reproductive health (privacy to bathe, use latrine, and maintain good menstrual hygiene)

Limited access to health services

Disruption of social network

Sharing a private space, like toilets and bathrooms, with men

Zulaika et al. [37]

Kenya

Panel data self-administered survey

High

May 2018 – March 2021

13–17

910

COVID-19

Sexual and reproductive health (pregnancy and sexual debut)

Closure of schools

Disruption in schooling due to lockdown

Reduction in household income

Temple et al. [38]

The United States

Cross-sectional face-to-face risk behaviour survey

Low

March 2009

14–18

584 447 (final sample)

Hurricane

Physical and sexual violence by a boyfriend

Intensity of exposure to traumatic stressor

Substance abuse

Sloand et al. [39]

Haiti

Cross-sectional audio computer-based interviews

Some concerns

2011 –2013

12–17

78

Earthquake

Dating violence by boyfriend or ex-boyfriend and domestic violence by a family member

Low levels of education

Young age

Limited access to mental health services

Social norms around intimate partner violence (IPV)

Cerna-Turoff et al. [40]

Haiti

Cross-sectional face-to-face household survey

High

2012

13–17

1,457

Earthquake

Physical, emotional, and sexual violence by a family or non-family member

Not reported

Epstein et al. [41]

19 Sub-Saharan African countries

Repeated face-to-face cross-sectional survey

High

2011 –2018

15–19

5,316

Drought

Physical, emotional, and sexual violence by intimate partner

Young age

Lower social standing and inexperience with relationships

Financial strain and food insecurity

Stress and poor mental health conditions

Disempowerment, unemployment, and economic dependence on partner

Augusti, Saetren, and Hafstad [42]

Norway

Cross-sectional web-based survey

Some concerns

June 2020

13–16

1,776

COVID-19

Physical, psychological, and sexual violence by a family or non-family member

Prior gender differences

Family conflict

Home confinement

Previous experience with abuse (re-victimisation)

Karp et al. [43]

Kenya

Mixed-method study of phone-based survey and in-depth interviews

High

June –August 2020

15–19

407

COVID-19

Relationship quality, sexual behaviours, and contraception use

COVID-19 induced social restrictions

Poverty, loss of financial resources or income

Prior gender divide

Economic instability

Deteriorating relationship between partners

Kerekes et al. [44]

Sweden, the USA, Serbia, Morocco, Vietnam

Cross-sectional web-based survey

Some concerns

September 2020 –February 2021

15–19

3,120

COVID-19

Physical violence, threats, and sexual harassment by anyone

Socioeconomic status

COVID-19 related restrictions

Increased stress caused by physical distancing

Rahiem [45]

Indonesia

Qualitative design using face-to-face semi-structured in-depth interviews

High

March –December 2020

14–17

10

COVID-19

Child marriage

Marriage as an escape route or remedy for boredom

Local customs

Economic instability

Lack of understanding of the impact and long-term consequences of underage marriage

Peer pressure

Oliveira et al. [46]

Brazil

Cross-sectional face-to-face retrospective study

Some concerns

2016 –2020

14–18

169

COVID-19

Physical and sexual violence by a family or non-family member

Social isolation and breakdown of social networks

Home confinement

Closure of schools

Patriarchal gender norms

Young age

Social norms around domestic violence