Skip to main content

Table 2 Women’s Attitudes towards Cervical Cancer Screening by Adherence Classification (N = 377)

From: Non-adherence to cervical cancer screening recommendations among women in Eswatini: a cross-sectional study

Attitude

Total

n (%)

Adherence Classification

P-value

Adherent

n (%)

Non-adherent

n (%)

I think VIA screening is:

 Too expensive

Agree

20 (5)

7 (4)

13 (6)

0.40

Disagree

357 (95)

159 (96)

198 (94)

 

 Embarrassing

Agree

103 (27)

41 (25)

62 (29)

0.31

Disagree

274 (73)

125 (75)

149 (71)

 

 Likely to be painful

Agree

146 (38)

34 (20)

112 (53)

 < 0.001a

Disagree

231 (61)

132 (80)

99 (47)

 

I am:

 At low risk of cervical cancer

Agree

161 (43)

83 (50)

78 (37)

0.01a

Disagree

216 (57)

83 (50)

133 (63)

 

 Not comfortable being screened by younger doctors/ nurses

Agree

81 (21)

32 (19)

49 (23)

0.35

Disagree

296 (79)

134 (81)

162 (77)

 

 Not comfortable being screened by male doctors/nurses

Agree

126 (33)

55 (33)

71 (34)

0.91

Disagree

251 (67)

111 (67)

140 (66)

 

 Able to get to a clinic that does screening easily

Agree

333 (88)

148 (89)

185 (88)

0.66

Disagree

44 (12)

18 (11)

26 (12)

 

 Worried that screening would show that I have cervical cancer

Agree

114 (30)

57 (34)

57 (27)

0.12a

Disagree

263 (70)

109 (66)

154 (73)

 

 Too busy to undergo VIA screening

Agree

66 (18)

35 (21)

31 (15)

 

Disagree

311 (82)

131 (79)

180 (85)

0.01a

I have been:

 Advised by a doctor/ nurse to screen

Agree

231 (61)

126 (76)

105 (50)

 < 0.001a

Disagree

146 (39)

40 (24)

106 (50)

 

 Encouraged by a friend, partner or family member to screen

Agree

120 (32)

55 (33)

65 (31)

0.46

Disagree

256 (68)

110 (66)

146 (69)

 
  1. Abbreviation: VIA visual inspection with acetic acid
  2. aStatistically significant at α = 0.25