Skip to main content

Table 3 Output of the IAR meeting for airports

From: Evaluating intra-action reviews at points of entry: ongoing learning opportunities during the COVID-19 pandemic

Ā 

Discussion topics

Recommended actions agreed upon during the IAR

Follow up after 3ā€‰months

Session 1 - Public health measures

ā€¢ Difficulties to timely implement mandatory public health measures after announcement on a government level;

ā€¢ The implementation of measures practically varies per airport due to their size and specific setting;

ā€¢ The enforcement of behavioral regulations, such as social distancing, is difficult at airports;

ā€¢ Operations of monitoring the mandatory public health measures for travelers;

ā€¢ Unequivocal and clear public communication to incoming travelers.

ā€¢ Involve local stakeholders timely in the drafting of measures on a national level to increase suitability and applicability to practice and involve the RIVM when needed;

ā€¢ Inquire whether tailor-made implementation of measures is possible for airports other than Schiphol;

ā€¢ It is strived for to include an infectious disease consultant in the 3-weekly meeting structure between the MoH and airport authorities. The RIVM is invited when deemed necessary;

ā€¢ The signal of the difficulty of maintaining the behavioral regulations is shared with the respective national security authority;

ā€¢ An infectious disease consultant has been included into the 3-weekly meeting;

ā€¢ Signals on tailor-made implementations and the control of measures had been shared and discussed on a national level.

Session 2 ā€“ Regional, supra-regional and national collaboration

ā€¢ Short communication lines, mutual trust, and an informal and pragmatic ambiance among partners in the region was considered essential and established in the majority of the regions;

ā€¢ An enormous expansion of staff at the PHS and high turnover in staff complicates cooperation among partners;

ā€¢ Discussion among partners from different regions as well as with the MoH and the RIVM is considered valuable;

ā€¢ Centralized contact-tracing for flight contacts by the PHS for the A-port is considered efficient and should be continued;

ā€¢ It is important to provide insight in the different meeting structures that exists between regions and on a national level;

ā€¢ Regional partners keep investing in their regional network, now and in inter-pandemic times;

ā€¢ The regional PHS and airport authorities for each airport will map out the existing cooperation structures, and identify ways to optimise it;

ā€¢ A clear overview of the existing national platforms and meetings is provided by the MoH;

ā€¢ At Schiphol airport, an inventory for agreements will be done to deal with stranded transit passengers.

ā€¢ Regions stressed that these issues require continuous attention, but no concrete regional actions were noted;

ā€¢ The MoH has provided an overview of existing national platforms;

ā€¢ At Schiphol, a protocol has been developed to deal with stranded travelers;

  1. PHS public health service, MoH Ministry of Health, RIVM National Institute of Public Health