Sedentary behaviour, physical activity, and sleep among office workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparison of Brazil and Sweden

Table 3 Mean ilr coordinates of each group; results of the univariate post-hoc tests

	Brazil	Sweden	t	MD [95% CI]	p	d
Working days
ilr₁: TIB/awake	0.92	0.72	5.49	0.20 [0.13; 0.27]	< 0.001	0.82
ilr₂: SED/non-SED	1.54	0.79	9.94	0.76 [0.61; 0.91]	< 0.001	1.45
ilr₃: SEDshort/SEDlong	−0.33	−0.18	−2.31	−0.15 [−0.27; −0.02]	0.02	0.33
ilr₄: LPA/MVPA	0.90	0.79	2.10	0.11 [0.01; 0.22]	0.04	0.30
Non-working days
ilr₁: TIB/awake	0.92	0.90	0.61	0.02 [−0.05; 0.09]	0.54	0.09
ilr₂: SED/non-SED	1.00	0.41	7.21	0.59 [0.43; 0.75]	< 0.001	1.02
ilr₃: SEDshort/SEDlong	−0.14	0.10	−3.29	−0.24 [−0.38; −0.10]	0.001	0.46
ilr₄: LPA/MVPA	1.00	0.87	2.63	0.14 [0.03; 0.24]	0.01	0.38

ilr isometric log-ratio, t t-test statistic, MD mean difference between Brazilian and Swedish group, 95% CI lower and upper limit of a 95% confidence interval on the mean difference, p significance level, d Cohen’s effect size d, TIB time-in-bed, SED sedentary behaviour, non-SED non-sedentary behaviour, LPA light physical activity, MVPA moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, Results with p < 0.05 are shown in bold

ISSN: 1471-2458