Skip to main content

Table 5 Mediation analysis results of the degree of implementation of the DAGIS intervention on children’s consumption of FV, sugary everyday foods, sugary treats, and SSB. Single mediator models, control group as the reference

From: Effects of the DAGIS randomized controlled trial on home environment and children’s food consumption according to the degree of implementation

 

a path1

b path2

a x b path3

Direct effect4

Low DOI

High DOI

 

Low DOI

High DOI

Low DOI

High DOI

B (SE)

p

B (SE)

p

B (SE)

p

B (95% CI)

p

B (95% CI)

p

B (95% CI)

p

B (95% CI)

p

FV, n = 406–412

Availability

-0.09 (0.06)

0.14

0.07 (0.06)

0.21

44.90 (12.65)

> 0.001

-4.24 (-11.38, 1.45)

0.14

3.10 (-2.03,9.26)

0.28

13.43 (-16.75,45.03)

0.39

17.87 (-11.26, 45.59)

0.22

Parental role modelling

-0.27 (0.59)

0.64

0.52 (0.55)

0.38

7.08 (1.36)

> 0.001

-1.96 (-11.00, 5.85)

0.65

3.72 (-3.95, 12.19)

0.34

4.60 (-28.06, 38.90)

0.79

18.29 (-12.44, 47.68)

0.22

Norm

-0.02 (0.20)

0.92

0.43 (0.19)

0.02

9.93 (4.09)

0.02

-0.31 (-4.91, 4.29)

0.85

4.31 (0.23, 10.59)

0.03

10.90 (-20.98, 41.89)

0.5

16.22 (-13.06, 45.01)

0.27

Sugary everyday foods, n = 409–413

Availability

-0.13 (0.06)

0.03

-0.11 (0.06)

0.06

18.44 (6.39)

> 0.01

-2.17 (-5.09, -0.09)

0.04

-1.93 (-4.71, 0.09)

0.07

-12.90 (-28.34, 2.11)

0.09

6.23 (-7.63, 21.03)

0.38

Parental role modelling

0.13 (0.19)

0.49

0.06 (0.18)

0.73

5.61 (2.05)

> 0.01

0.73 (-1.46, 3.37)

0.52

0.35 (-1.82, 2.60)

0.74

-11.87 (-27.21, 2.44)

0.12

3.24 (-10.77, 17.46)

0.66

Norm

-0.02 (0.07)

0.75

-0.13 (0.06)

0.04

4.69 (6.00)

0.43

-0.07 (-1.14, 0.88)

0.92

-0.55 (-2.34, 0.94)

0.48

-10.80 (-25.90, 5.04)

0.18

3.03 (-10.82, 17.48)

0.69

Sugary treats, n = 412–414

Availability

-0.02 (0.06)

0.78

0.01 (0.06)

0.86

9.41 (3.31)

> 0.01

-0.15 (-1.41, 1.05)

0.79

0.10 (-1.17, 1.39)

0.85

-3.50 (-12.04, 5.45)

0.41

2.42 (-5.73, 10.49)

0.56

Parental role modelling

0.09 (0.16)

0.57

0.12 (0.15)

0.44

2.35 (1.34)

0.08

0.22 (-0.64, 1.29)

0.57

0.26 (-0.43, 1.37)

0.5

-3.03 (-10.91, 5.85)

0.47

1.75 (-6.27, 9.63)

0.69

Norm

-0.00 (0.02)

0.88

-0.02 (0.02)

0.36

7.48 (8.25)

0.37

-0.03 (-0.69, 0.58)

0.94

-0.15 (-0.89, 0.34)

0.6

-3.84 (-12.33, 4.44)

0.37

3.95 (-4.36, 12.28)

0.35

SSB, n = 409–413

Availability

-0.00 (0.09)

0.98

-0.16 (0.08)

0.06

18.30 (6.66)

> 0.01

0.07 (-3.76, 3.56)

0.99

-2.88 (-7.23, 0.14)

0.06

17.80 (-7.02, 42.16)

0.15

-26.49 (-48.61, -5.05)

0.02

Parental role modelling

0.01 (0.15)

0.94

-0.09 (0.13)

0.53

11.85 (4.19)

> 0.01

0.05 (-3.90, 3.81)

0.99

-1.03 (-4.86, 2.45)

0.53

19.93 (-2.90, 42.46)

0.1

-27.71 (-49.05, -4.80)

0.02

Norm

0.06 (0.04)

0.17

-0.05 (0.04)

0.23

33.67 (14.01)

0.02

2.24 (-1.07, 6.90)

0.18

-1.63 (-5.56, 1.08)

0.26

11.77 (-13.73, 36.12)

0.35

-27.10 (-49.20, -4.90)

0.02

  1. Significant associations bolded; DOI: degree of implementation. SE standard error, FV Fruit and vegetables, SSB Sugar-sweetened beverages
  2. apath adjusted for: age, gender, parental education level, and baseline value of the mediator
  3. bpath adjusted for: age, gender, parental education level, and baseline values of the mediator and outcome
  4. 1effect of the independent variable on the mediator (difference of follow-up and baseline values of the mediator)
  5. 2effect of the mediator on the outcome (difference of follow-up and baseline values of the outcome)
  6. 3effect of the independent variable on the outcome via the mediator
  7. 4effect of the independent variable on the outcome when adjusting for the mediator