Skip to main content

Table 3 Multinomial logistic regression models for (a) girls and (b) boys on the body size perception

From: Factors associated with body size perception among adolescent goal-oriented sports participants and non-participants: a cross-sectional Finnish study

 

Perceived thinness

Perceived fatness

a) Girls (n = 724)

Variable

OR

95% CIa

OR

95% CIa

Competitive goals in sports, yes vs no

0.88

0.38–2.06

0.86

0.53–1.39

BMI

0.56

0.45–0.70***

1.36

1.25–1.48***

Appearance/weight motives, per unit increaseb

0.92

0.74–1.16

2.22

1.88–2.64***

Perceived physical fitness, good vs poor

0.57

0.28–1.17

0.30

0.19–0.47***

Health/fitness motives, per unit increaseb

1.04

0.80–1.35

0.76

0.63–0.91**

b) Boys (n = 687)

Variable

OR

95% CIa

OR

95% CIa

Competitive goals in sports, yes vs no

1.16

0.74–1.80

0.58

0.29–1.14

BMI

0.69

0.62–0.78***

1.46

1.31–1.61***

Appearance/weight motives, per unit increaseb

0.90

0.75–1.07

1.58

1.26–1.99***

Perceived physical fitness, good vs poor

0.60

0.34–1.07

0.20

0.11–0.36***

Health/fitness motives, per unit increaseb

1.05

0.88–1.25

0.82

0.64–1.04

  1. “About the right size” was the reference category. The models were controlled for competitive goals in sports, BMI, perceived physical fitness, self-rated health, appearance/weight motives, enjoyment motives, health/fitness motives, social motives, and moderate to vigorous physical activity
  2. BMI body mass index, CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio
  3. aSignificance of the OR: **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001
  4. bRange between 0 and 6, a higher score indicating greater emphasis