Skip to main content

Table 5 Multilevel analysis of MCV2 utilization in the best Model (model III) with frequency of independent factors between vaccinated and unvaccinated as well as the COR

From: Measles second dose vaccine utilization and associated factors among children aged 24–35 months in Sub-Saharan Africa, a multi-level analysis from recent DHS surveys

Variables

Mcv2 utilization

Odds ratio

No

Yes

COR [95% CI]

AOR [95% CI]

Age of mothers

 15–24

2,752 (28.73%)

1,478 (26.81%)

1.00

1.00

 25–34

4,413 (46.09%)

2,614 (47.42%)

1.11 (1.02—1.22)

1.15 (1.05—1.26)**

 35 + 

2,411 (25.18%)

1,421 (25.77%)

1.15 (1.03—1.27)

1.26 (1.14—1.41)***

Mothers educational

 No education

3,312 (34.59%)

1,420 (25.76%)

1.00

1.00

 Primary education

3,618 (37.79%)

2,022 (36.68%)

1.17 (1.06 -1.29)

0.92 (0.83—1.02)

 Secondary& above

2,645 (27.62%)

2,071 (37.56%)

1.95 (1.77—2.14)

1.27 (1.13—1.43)***

Mother marital status

 Married

6,888 (71.93%)

3,709 (67.27%)

1.00

1.00

 Not married

2,688 (28.07%)

1,804 (32.73%)

1.18 (1.09—1.28)

0.95 (0.85—1.06)

Media access

 No

3,935 (41.09%)

2,051 (37.21%)

1.00

1.00

 Yes

5,641 (58.91%)

3,462 (62.79%)

1.11 (1.02—1.20)

0.93 (0.85—1.01)

Wealth index

 Poor

4,488 (46.87%)

2,108 (38.23%)

1.00

1.00

 Middle

1,893 (19.77%)

1,146 (20.78%)

1.06 (0.99—1.19)

1.03 (0.92—1.15)

 Rich

3,194 (33.36%)

2,260 (40.99%)

1.15 (1.07—1.28)

1.08 (0.96—1.21)

Sex of child

 Male

4,794 (50.07%)

2,852 (51.73%)

1.00

1.00

 Female

4,781 (49.93%)

2,662 (48.27%)

0.92 (0.86—0.99)

0.95 (0.88—1.02)

Distance to a health facility

 Big problem

3,971 (41.93%)

1,957 (36.73%)

1.00

1.00

 Not big problem

5,499 (58.07%)

3,371 (63.27%)

1.31 (1.21—1.41)

1.21 (1.12—1.31)***

Twin status

 Single birth

9,401 (98.18%)

5,439 (98.65%)

1.00

1.00

 Multiple births

175 (1.82%)

75 (1.35%)

0.68 (0.51—0.90)

0.70 (0.53—0.95)*

Sex of household head

 Male

7,694 (80.35%)

4,259 (77.25%)

1.00

1.00

 Female

1,881 (19.65%)

1,254 (22.75%)

1.07 (1.02—1.17)

0.95 (0.86—1.05)

ANC visit

 No

1,568 (16.38%)

253 (4.60%)

1.00

1.00

 1–3

2,791 (29.15%)

1,665 (30.21%)

2.01 (1.58—3.03)

1.13 (0.73 – 1.62)

 4 + 

5,215 (54.47%)

3,594 (65.19%)

4.40 (3.79—5.11)

2.75 (2.35—3.24)***

PNC visit

 No

6,427 (67.31%)

3,271 (59.49%)

1.00

1.00

 Yes

3,122 (32.69%)

2,228 (40.51%)

1.41 (1.31—1.52)

1.13 (1.04—1.23)***

Place of delivery

 Home

3,684 (38.48%)

1,013 (18.38%)

1.00

1.00

 Health facilities

5,891 (61.52%)

4,500 (81.62%)

2.92 (2.67—3.18)

2.24 (2.04—2.46)***

Child size at birth

 Large

3,031 (31.66%)

1,719 (31.18%)

1.00

1.00

 Average

5,226 (54.58%)

3,142 (56.99%)

1.05 (0.96—1.14)

1.04 (0.95—1.13)

 Small

1,318 (13.76%)

652 (11.83%)

0.84 (0.75—0.95)

0.88 (0.78—1.01)

Residence

 Urban

3,104 (32.42%)

1,989 (36.08%)

1.00

1.00

 Rural

6,471 (67.58%)

3,525 (63.92%)

0.81 (0.74—0.88)

0.69 (0.57—0.82)**

Community-level media usage

 Low

4,845 (50.60%)

2,744 (49.77%)

1.00

1.00

 High

4,730 (49.40%)

2,769 (50.23%)

0.99 (0.88—1.12)

0.88 (0.77—1.00)

Community-level women education

 Low

4,818 (50.32%)

2,538 (46.04%)

1.00

1.00

 High

4,757 (49.68%)

2,975 (53.96%)

1.15 (1.03—1.30)

0.89 (0.79—1.02)

Community level poverty

 Low

8,216 (85.80%)

4,998 (90.65%)

1.00

1.00

 High

1,359 (14.20%)

515 (9.35%)

0.57 (0.48—0.69)

0.66 (0.54—0.80)***

  1. *P-value < 0.05
  2. **P-value < 0.01
  3. ***P-value < 0.001