From: Gender operationalisation and stress measurement in research with adolescent males: a scoping review
Level of adaptation | Examples of adaptation taken from studies | Number of studies (% of total) |
---|---|---|
No evidence in method that design was adapted for participants’ age | n/a | 67 (70.5) |
Process or protocol designed to accommodate participants’ age | Pilot study to obtain feedback about the clarity, length, comprehensiveness, and time of completion of measures [42]; Items deleted, added, or changed to make more appropriate for children’s self-reports [59]; Items adapted to address the adolescent’s situation [60]; Modifications to instrument based on judgement of research team and focus groups [61]; Items read aloud and paraphrased and participants encouraged to ask questions when uncertain of item meaning [62] | 4 (4.2) |
Measure acknowledged as adapted or intended for age group (designed or validated) | Good internal consistency and test–retest reliability among adolescents [28]; PSS has demonstrated good internal consistency in both adolescents [35]; Urban Hassles Scale has adequate psycho-metric properties for adolescent respondents [28] | 6 (6.3) |
Self-evident in name or description that measure is appropriate for age group | Adolescent Minor Stress Inventory [63]; Child Stress Scale [52]; Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children-PTS section [55]; 40-item Adolescent Life Event Stress Scale [53] | 18 (19) |