Skip to main content

Table 2 Odds ratios (95% CI) from quasibinomial generalized linear models. Model 1 compares proportion of children who were exposed to any alcohol outlet by area-level deprivation. Model 2 compares observed proportion of GPS locations from each child exposed to off-sales and on-sales alcohol outlets by area-level deprivation. (IncQ1 = most deprived)

From: Inequalities in children’s exposure to alcohol outlets in Scotland: a GPS study

 

Model 1

Model 2

  

Off-sales

On-sales

Least deprived (IncQ5)

Ref

Ref

Ref

IncQ4

0.91 (0.36–2.27)

1.36 (0.87–2.11)

1.68 (1.05–2.69) *

IncQ3

1.20 (0.29–4.90)

2.15 (0.83–5.58)

2.16 (1.08–4.27) *

IncQ2

0.84 (0.12–6.06)

3.17 (2.29–4.39) ***

3.09 (1.86–5.15) ***

Most deprived (IncQ1)

1.26 (0.33–4.89)

4.83 (3.04–7.66) ***

2.86 (1.11–7.43) *

Urbanicity (urban)

Ref

Ref

Ref

Urbanicity (rural)

0.61 (0.23–1.77)

0.66 (0.38–1.16)

0.97 (0.51–1.84)

Season (winter)

Ref

Ref

Ref

Season (summer)

0.64 (0.23–1.77)

1.79 (1.18–2.71) **

1.26 (0.68–2.30)

Sex (male)

Ref

Ref

Ref

Sex (female)

0.84 (0.33–2.14)

1.37 (0.88–2.14)

1.36 (0.72–2.55)

N

688

688

688

Pseudo R2

0.02

0.24

0.07

  1. Pseudo R2 = 1 – (Residual Deviance / Null Deviance)
  2. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05