Skip to main content

Table 4 Interaction effect of community groups and timepoint on antenatal care visit and postnatal care visits

From: The role of Savings and Internal Lending Communities (SILCs) in improving community-level household wealth, financial preparedness for birth, and utilization of reproductive health services in rural Zambia: a secondary analysis

 

>  4 or more ANC visits

All 4 PNC visits

Community groups

AOR (95% CI)

AOR (95% CI)

 1 = neither MWH nor SILC

1.09 (0.76–1.55)

0.96 (0.50–1.88)

 2 = only MWH

0.86 (0.59–1.24)

0.87 (0.42–1.80)

 3 = both MWH and SILC

Ref

Ref

Time point

 Baseline

Ref

Ref

 Endline

1.43 (0.88–2.33)

2.60 (1.47–4.58) **

Community group X time pointa

 1 = neither MWH nor SILC X End Line

1.13 (0.68–1.88)

0.58 (0.22–1.50)

 2 = only MWH X End Line

1.46 (0.80–2.67)

1.04 (0.45–2.36)

 3 = both MWH and SILC X End line

Ref

Ref

  1. All adjusted logistic regression models controlled for age, marital status, gravida, parity, education, wealth (quintiles), community group, and timepoint. Please refer to Table 1 for more details on these variables. All analysis were clustered at the community level
  2. AOR Adjusted odds ratio, CI Confidence interval, MWH Maternity waiting homes, SILC Savings and internal lending communities, ANC Antenatal care, PNC Postnatal care
  3. **p < 0.01; a z test for equality comparing CG1 and CG2 showed insignificant results for four or more ANC visits and all 4 PNC visits