Skip to main content

Table 3 Interaction effect of community groups and timepoint on wealth and saving for most recent delivery

From: The role of Savings and Internal Lending Communities (SILCs) in improving community-level household wealth, financial preparedness for birth, and utilization of reproductive health services in rural Zambia: a secondary analysis

 

Wealth index

Saved for most recent delivery

Community groups

Adjusted b (SE){95% CI}

AOR (95% CI)

 1 = neither MWH nor SILC

0.39 (0.14) {0.09–0.68} *

0.72 (0.45–1.17)

 2 = only MWH

0.73 (0.08) {0.55–0.91} ***

0.64 (0.40–1.01)

 3 = both MWH and SILC

Ref

Ref

Time point

 Baseline

Ref

Ref

 Endline

−0.07 (0.07) {−0.22–0.07}

0.71 (0.42–1.18)

Community group X time pointa

 1 = neither MWH nor SILC X End Line

0.11 (0.10) {−0.09–0.32}

0.88 (0.47–1.65)

 2 = only MWH X End Line

0.18 (0.10) {−0.02–0.40}

0.98 (0.52–1.84)

 3 = both MWH and SILC X End line

Ref

Ref

  1. All adjusted logistic and linear regression models controlled for age, marital status, gravida, parity, education, community group, and timepoint. Please refer to Table 1 for more details on these variables
  2. All analysis were clustered at the community level
  3. AOR Adjusted odds ratio, CI Confidence interval, b Unstandardized coefficient, SE Standard error, MWH Maternity waiting homes, SILC Savings and internal lending communities
  4. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001; a z test for equality comparing CG1 and CG2 showed insignificant results for wealth index and saved for most recent delivery