Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality appraisal checklist and total quality score for included quantitative studies

From: Acceptability of predictive testing for ischemic heart disease in those with a family history and the impact of results on behavioural intention and behaviour change: a systematic review

Criteriaa

Claassen et al [59]

Imes et al [60]

Stocks et al [61]

Sanderson and Michie [58]

Sanderson et al [57]

Question / objective sufficiently described?

2

2

2

2

2

Study design evident and appropriate?

2

2

1

2

2

Method of subject/comparison group selection or input variables described and appropriate?

2

2

2

2

2

Subject characteristics sufficiently described?

2

2

2

2

2

If interventional and random allocation was possible, was it described?

N/A

N/A

2

2

N/A

If interventional and blinding of investigators was possible, was it reported?

N/A

N/A

0

0

N/A

If interventional and blinding of subjects was possible, was it reported?

N/A

N/A

1

0

N/A

Outcome and (if applicable) exposure measure(s) well defined and robust to measurement / misclassification bias?

2

2

2

2

2

Sample size appropriate?

0

0

1

2

2

Analytic methods described/justified and appropriate?

2

2

2

2

2

Some estimate of variance is reported for the main results?

1

2

2

1

2

Controlled for confounding?

1

0

1

2

N/A

Results reported in sufficient detail?

2

2

2

2

2

Conclusions supported by the results?

2

2

2

2

2

Total score (%)

82%

82%

79%

82%

100%

  1. aYes = 2, Partial = 1, No = 0, or not applicable (N/A). Summary score calculated as: ((number of yes × 2) + (number of partials ×1))/(28-(number of N/A × 2))