Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of discrimination and calibration among female prediction model

From: Updating Framingham CVD risk score using waist circumference and estimated cardiopulmonary function: a cohort study based on a southern Xinjiang population

 

AUC

95%CI

P-value

NRI

P-value

cNRI

P-value

IDI

P-value

pseudo R2

Model1

0.736

(0.710, 0.756)

-

1

-

-

-

1

-

NE

Model2

0.754

(0.728,0.773)

0.001

0.008

0.704

0.114

0.016

0.006

0.276

0.106

Model3

0.757

(0.734,0.779)

 < 0.001

0.022

0.283

0.073

0.127

0.010

0.063

0.107

Model4

0.757

(0.734,0.779)

 < 0.001

0.021

0.322

0.077

0.105

0.010

0.061

0.107

  1. Abbreviations: Model1 is the Framingham model corrected with the data of this population, Model2 is the model with only waist circumference variables added, Model3 is the model with only eCRF added, and Model4 is the model with both eCRF and waist circumference variables added
  2. NE Not estimated
Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us