BMC Public Health

Table 4 Bottleneck analysis result (%)

From: Configurations for positive public behaviors in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis

CE-FDH ^a	PCB				ECB
CE-FDH ^a	RC	DT	RP	NE	RC	DT	RP	NE
0	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN
10	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN
20	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN
30	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN
40	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN
50	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN
60	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN
70	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN
80	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN	NN
90	NN	NN	NN	NN	2.0	NN	NN	5.0
100	NN	NN	NN	NN	2.0	1.0	NN	5.0

RC Risk communication, DT Degree of trust, RP Risk perception, NE Negative emotions, PCB Protective coping behavior, ECB Excessive coping behavior
^a CE-FDH (the non-parametric Ceiling Envelopment with Free Disposal Hull) method was adopted, and NN is “not necessary.”

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us

Submission enquiries: bmcpublichealth@biomedcentral.com
General enquiries: ORSupport@springernature.com