Skip to main content

Table 4 Regression results

From: Survey on determinants of intention to reduce nasopharyngeal cancer risk: an application of the theory of planned behavior

Hypothesis

Relationship

Robust OLS

PLS-SEM

Supported

H1

Age and intention

−0.094

− 0.109

No

 

(−1.540)

(−1.449)

 

H2

Barriers and ntention

0.029

−0.011

No

 

(0.520)

(0.181)

 

H3

Gender and intention

−0.124

−0.047

No

 

(−1.060)

(−1.061)

 

H4

Income and intention

0.079

0.068

No

 

(0.790)

(0.751)

 

H5

Perceived behavioral control and intention

0.144b

0.211c

Yes

 

(2.110)

(2.737)

 

H6

Race and intention

0.036

0.013

No

 

(0.330)

(0.087)

 

H7

Religion and intention

0.047

0.039

No

 

(0.370)

(0.25)

 

H8

Risk and intention

0.240c

0.364c

Yes

 

(3.590)

(4.142)

 

H9

Subjective norm and intention

0.032

0.016

No

 

(0.420)

(0.184)

 

H10

Benefit and intention

0.048

0.026

No

 

(0.560)

(0.334)

 

H11

Education and intention

−0.004

− 0.012

No

 

(− 0.100)

(0.226)

 

H12

Knowledge and intention

0.039

0.034

No

 

(0.450)

(0.485)

 

H13

Marital status and intention

0.461c

0.208c

Yes

 

(2.760)

(3.115)

 

H14

Past behavior and intention

0.093

0.069

No

 

(1.480)

(1.043)

 

H15

Severity and intention

0.191a

0.144a

Yes

 

(1.910)

(1.730)

 

R2

 

0.371

0.295

 
  1. All reported values are coefficient values except the values inside parentheses, which are T-Values. a,b, and c denote significance level of 10%, 5%, and 1%, respectively